It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tsu322
reply to post by OpenMindedRealist
There are a lot of slag heaps where I live and I see them every day on the way to work. The heaps here are from coal mines and a lot darker than the heap in the pics but it looks like the exact same shape but bigger.
freestonew
reply to post by freestonew
they say no work camps are anywhere nearby. no mines either.
freestone
AndyMayhew
reply to post by rickymouse
I believe that some Siberian tribes thought that mammoths were burrowing creatures which died on exposure to air ..... Could this be a mammoth hill (like a mole hill, but bigger)?
Char-Lee
AndyMayhew
reply to post by rickymouse
I believe that some Siberian tribes thought that mammoths were burrowing creatures which died on exposure to air ..... Could this be a mammoth hill (like a mole hill, but bigger)?
Interesting I wonder why they would think that. Tribal people seem very observant of nature, maybe there was a similar looking animal that lived underground.
I'm not saying it is definitely a mine, I'm really not sure what it is but in this pic there seems to be something like a road going around the heap.
I am sure it is mad made somehow, tunneling, mining, that sort of thing.
zayonara
I am leaning towards a dried up geyser. A giant water jet that erupted fiercely, stopped for a while, and then erupted again with less intensity, could have made this mound of "gravel".
www4.ncsu.edu...edit on 13-11-2013 by zayonara because: (no reason given)
jtma508
reply to post by Char-Lee
How about the reports of the odd, circular bore holes located in remote areas in Russia/Siberia? What struck me about those reports was the lack of excavated material. Where did it go? Is it possible it was transported here by helicopter and dumped?
Mystery Holes in Russia
From the end of 1980s a strange phenomena is happening in some Russian forests. People find strange, deep holes.
They appear in the dense forest, in the places you can’t get on the car or truck to bring any device to drill the ground. There is no any soil that should be taken from such deep holes is found.
On this pictures people go down to one of such holes but it just finishes with nothing. There are no any reasonable ideas on how these holes appear and what they are being used for.
11andrew34
This area was covered by glaciers during the previous ice age, which makes it likely to be a glacial landform of some sort. And obviously, it wasn't there before the previous ice-age, or at least, the rock pile wasn't. Perhaps the depression is an old meteorite crater? But even that wouldn't have been necessary to explain it.
As the glacier melted, streams formed, some of them short lived. A short lived stream may have transported and deposited rocks in this pattern, perhaps off a small waterfall coming off a glacier, say a ~20ft wall of ice just above it. You can see the formation is not perfectly circular; it's oriented with the slope. Larger/heavier rocks piled up in the middle where the water fell. Smaller rocks scattered radially, pushed from that center by the water flow. That's the easy part to guess.
This location is relatively close to the source of the alpine glacier. It would have begun to form at the end of the life of the glacier. So here's my guess at how the cone formed:
The formation began at the base of a waterfall off the ice wall of a glacier. The base level of this formation formed first. The heaviest rocks remained in the center where they fell, and smaller rocks were pushed from the center into a ring. As the glacier melted, the ice wall retreated, and so the place where the water fall hit the ground traveled uphill over time. Also, as the glacier was in its last years, the average flow rate decreased from year to year, and the drop of the falls became shorter. With less water flowing and less far to drop, the energy to scatter rocks is gradually decreasing. Thus the radius of the ring becomes shorter over time, as the center point travels uphill, explaining the cone shape, and smaller rocks can increasingly remain in the center instead of being scattered out to the ring wall. The final central rock pile is the final landing spot for the waterfall that created this formation.
One thing I'd add though is that the rock pile is supposedly all limestone. Limestone is very susceptible to weathering. I'm not sure if it's unusual for a pile of limestone to have lasted so long there. This could have formed maybe a few thousand years ago. But maybe as it's from the last days of the glacier, it's not such an old formation.edit on 12-11-2013 by 11andrew34 because: grammer
Alas, but the version with the Tunguska meteorite turned out to be wrong too. They managed to determine the age of the crater more precisely according to the cuts of the trees around. Scientists concluded that the crater was about 250 years old.
lonewolf19792000
Looks like a tornado landed there.
zayonara
reply to post by Char-Lee
To a large geyser with immense force, those boulders, are "gravel". It's a matter of scale. It's perfectly natural for the hole to be re-sealed by "fall back" after the water jet stopped.