It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I was under the impression that the trend was toward a more informed consumer of goods and services, not a less informed one. We want GMO foods labelled. We're demanding calorie and other nutrition information on restaurant menus and grocery store products. We produce videos showing what actually happens at meat processing plants.
My doctor was perfectly willing to show me where my cancer was, because we demand that patients give fully informed consent before we perform a procedure.
I like the idea of empowering women, and other people, to make fully informed decisions as far as those decisions comply with the law.
I'm ok with opinions but when you are forcing your opinions unto others live, it's far beyond disrespect.
I'm not going to go out of my way to "teach" people how to live their own lives.
But here's a thought. I'm not as expert on women's bodies as I'd like to be (95% serious, 5% sly smirk) but it seems to me that even without invasive exams, a doctor can tell how far along the pregnancy is with great accuracy. If the objection is to the probe, couldn't the doctor show her a video of what a typical pregnency that far along looks like? No intrusive exam, more information for the mother. It sounds like every one wins
Nephalim
reply to post by charles1952
People are terrorists now for wanting to save a child's life now Charles; I thought you knew.edit on 11-11-2013 by Nephalim because: (no reason given)
cuckooold
Nephalim
reply to post by charles1952
People are terrorists now for wanting to save a child's life now Charles; I thought you knew.edit on 11-11-2013 by Nephalim because: (no reason given)
Do you think that by justifying an act of terror by suggesting it has ultimately 'good' aims in anyway lessens that act of terror? It reminds me of the old 'we had to destroy that village in order to save it', military justification of tactics used in the Vietnam war.
"These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life....The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives. The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime. Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government. 'It is a promise of the Constitution that there is a realm of personal liberty which the government may not enter.'”
cuckooold
reply to post by Nephalim
I assumed that what I quoted you saying was in relation to the original posting about people kidnapping women on the way to the abortion clinic. If that is the case, well then yes, I would consider that an act of terror, regardless of whether these kidnappers believed what they were doing is right or not.
If I am misinterpreting what you have said, please specify so I can see where I may have misunderstood.