posted on Nov, 12 2013 @ 07:07 PM
To all those citing loosely interpreted scripture to buttress the notion that we, as humans, control our own fates and the planet's
that's all fine and dandy with a cherry on top. I, too, can find 'bible codes' to tell me that Oswald shot JFK... after
The fact of the matter is, climate science deniers almost exclusively take this obstinate stance on the grounds that human beings cannot themselves
change the course of the Earth's destiny, in accordance with their interpretation of religious teaching, and to believe otherwise is effectively
apostasy. As such, if the Earth is in fact warming up and, as a direct offshoot, severe weather phenomena are becoming more intense and frequent - a
manifest obviousness that needs no science, only logic, to see - it must be of "God's" doing.
whose interpretation of the religious text is correct? Which 'versions' are we meant to be paying attention to ― Old Testament, King
James'? And if the very fundamental understanding of the instruction 2+ billion sheepl... people
espouse, how do we know which
religion is the real deal? Maybe Muhammad had the correct translation all along...
Your "God" is either an irascible, pissed, vengeful omni-everything and takes pleasure in burning the occupants of his ant farm with a magnifying
glass -or- you've all got it wrong and have been "led astray". There's no middle ground, here. Do acknowledge this fact or do not. There is no
trying to explain away the fact of this irreconcilable inconsistency, Gungans.
edit on 12-11-2013 by iLemming because: (no reason