It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Spookybelle
A disparity in wealth is irrelevant as long as their is a path available for everyone to earn as much as they are motivated to.
If people do not want to work for it or are not smart enough to get it than it should not be given to them. As far as I know, there are multiple paths to wealth in the US.
There is nobody out to purposefully limit any specific group other than the individuals limiting themselves.
DeadSeraph
Spookybelle
A disparity in wealth is irrelevant as long as their is a path available for everyone to earn as much as they are motivated to.
If people do not want to work for it or are not smart enough to get it than it should not be given to them. As far as I know, there are multiple paths to wealth in the US.
There is nobody out to purposefully limit any specific group other than the individuals limiting themselves.
That is the party line, and it has worked extraordinarily well for the past 100 years, that's for sure. "You're poor because you didn't work as hard as I did" or "You're poor because you spent your money on stupid things and didn't invest it like I did".
What the haves always seem to fail to recognize is that most of them started with an advantage. I had Bill Gates used as an example of someone who started with nothing and created a business empire. That individual apparently wasn't aware that Gates had an Ivy league education waiting for him (not exactly cheap), and came from a wealthy family. So while he didn't start out a billionaire by any means, he was from a family that was affluent enough to buy him an ivy league education. That is a leg up in life, no matter how you want to spin it.
Telling someone from south central L.A that has grown up in generations of poverty and substance abuse that they can be CEO's of fortune 500 companies if they only work hard enough is patently ridiculous.
corvuscorrax
reply to post by Spookybelle
Is it lonely up there on your pedestal where you can cast your judgment on each and every 'error' someone has made?
And good lord just noticed you say "no one has been forced into poverty"... wow Ignorant or naive? Possibly a mixture of both.
edit on 11-11-2013 by corvuscorrax because: (no reason given)
Spookybelle
A disparity in wealth is irrelevant as long as their is a path available for everyone to earn as much as they are motivated to.
If people do not want to work for it or are not smart enough to get it than it should not be given to them. As far as I know, there are multiple paths to wealth in the US.
There is nobody out to purposefully limit any specific group other than the individuals limiting themselves.
Spookybelle
A disparity in wealth is irrelevant as long as their is a path available for everyone to earn as much as they are motivated to.
If people do not want to work for it or are not smart enough to get it than it should not be given to them. As far as I know, there are multiple paths to wealth in the US.
There is nobody out to purposefully limit any specific group other than the individuals limiting themselves.
corvuscorrax
reply to post by Spookybelle
The only thing I have evidence of is you having some sort of god complex which I felt the need to call you out on.
To say you could analyze any person and pinpoint their errors smacks of egotism in the highest degree.
Spookybelle
Are you implying that nobody has broken out of poverty on their own and that the only ones that have are the lucky ones?
I find that rather hard to believe.
You could give me the story of any person in poverty and with the exception of a debilitating accident or horrible disease affecting them, I could point out the exact errors they made in judgement that not only led them to poverty, but keeps them there.
No, nobody is forced into poverty, its something they more than likely have put themselves in.
And Bill Gates dropped out of college so going to Harvard had no impact on him.
Cabin
When a family is worth more than 100,000,000 citizens of the same country combined or the net worth of a single man is higher than 70,000,000 citizens of the same country combined, there is something seriously wrong...
How exactly are people being forced into poverty?
Spookybelle
A disparity in wealth is irrelevant as long as their is a path available for everyone to earn as much as they are motivated to.
If people do not want to work for it or are not smart enough to get it than it should not be given to them. As far as I know, there are multiple paths to wealth in the US.
There is nobody out to purposefully limit any specific group other than the individuals limiting themselves.
ownbestenemy
Cabin
When a family is worth more than 100,000,000 citizens of the same country combined or the net worth of a single man is higher than 70,000,000 citizens of the same country combined, there is something seriously wrong...
Let us start here then. Why do you believe there is something seriously wrong? If that "family" or that "man" has risen to such wealth, are they inherently wrong? Evil? Notorious?
Wealth inequality will always exist, as there will always be those who have something that another wants; more oxen, more land, more 'money', more...
What is the bigger issue is the environment in which we are all equally applied to; regardless of our station, in which we can strive to be more than what some Internet video likes to peg us as. There are still a multitude of stories streaming out of which people from the destitute to the mediocre, have risen to the occasion and somehow, despite what videos such as these say, drove themselves out of poverty or whatever situation they were in.
I am sure it speaking into a hallow cave though; rich people suck!
They note that the American economy has seen the lower and middle components of the value-added chain moving to the rapidly growing markets abroad and warn that soon higher-paying jobs may follow low-paying jobs in leaving the United States. The actions of the free market have made goods less expensive for Americans, but the free flow of labor and capital has also diminished the employment opportunities available in the United States and will, the authors warn, continue to do so at all levels of society.