It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Krazysh0t
reply to post by tsingtao
I'm not aware of God at all. I'm aware of this concept that men repeat over and over that is called God, but having actually met him or witnessed him, nope. THAT is why He needs to reveal himself to people such as myself. Faith may be good enough for you, but I consider that to be gullible and need some actual proof of His existence. I'm not the only one either. If God truly cared about us, He'd do things so that everyone has a fair chance to witness him to their liking and if they THEN choose to deny him, that is their problem. Instead He opts for this hands off approach while having stipulations that if you deny him you end up in hell. That is an awful big decision to commit to based off of faith alone and threatening people with eternal damnation for not obediently following orders and worshiping him sounds like downright bullying.
Not to mention, even among the believers, you guys cannot decide on the correct way to worship Him. Yet God deems it unnecessary to ever return to earth and straighten out which religious views are correct and which are hogwash.
Subnatural
tsingtao
Krazysh0t
MadMax9
reply to post by edmc^2
For people to admit God exists requires a response to him. Man does not want to do that so it's easier to say God not exist but space time and aliens do.
No it just requires that God show himself in a way that satisfies the unbeliever. He is supposed to be infinitely powerful, so he should know how to reveal himself individually to each and every person on the planet to leave zero doubt in their mind that he is the creator. God would know this is the case, yet chooses not to reveal himself using this method.
It's also easier to believe in evolution even though that requires more faith than believing in a being outside our understood time and space where all our existence is as if a split second.
Um, no it doesn't. Evolution is backed up by credible science. Does it explain everything? No, but that was never a claim that evolution or scientists who study it ever made. It also doesn't fill in the blanks with copout answers based on blind faith. It may fill in the blanks with educated guesses based on research, but it is always noted as such and as long as new evidence doesn't debunk these guesses, they can be upheld as probably true. I would say that believing something based on blind faith requires FAR more faith than believing something with much supporting evidence corroborating it. You are just being willfully ignorant here.
But ignorance does not prove the inexistance of something. Microbes do not believe humans exist because they are outside their understanding and their time and space relating to their form of existence.
Microbes also don't contemplate the existence of higher powers that may or may not have created them. But you bring up a good point, but you need to elaborate on it more. Ignorance doesn't prove the non-existence of something, but it doesn't prove its existence either. The fact remains we don't know one way or the other that a God exists or doesn't exist. This is indisputable.edit on 12-11-2013 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)
and God has to do this, why?
you are aware of Him, what more do you need?
or should i say, what more do people need?
With great power... comes great responsibility.
Nonsense to you, yes. I doubt your appraisal of these concepts, which seems to rely on your own assumptions and belief. I find it further unlikely that day to day experience is necessarily a reliable indicator for making such claims when our physical laws, indeed the universe itself (as we know it) that is required for such experience, didn't exist.
“Most and possibly all elementary particles may be created by materialization of energy.” -- astrophysicist Josip Kleczek / The Universe Vol 11 p17
tsingtao
your eternal welfare is not enough?
believe or not, you have that CHOICE.
Cogito, Ergo Sum
In either event, it could be a mistake to expect things to conform to our logic, or sense of intuition. Especially so, before our universe began. "Who knows" (at this stage) seems the most honest answer at least.
Cogito, Ergo Sum
Would be happy to ditch the concept (I find it unlikely the concept of "nothing" in the philosophical sense, is valid), more so if there are valid scientific reasons for doing so.
I think these are good points. The concept of nothing is especially problematic. What does it even mean?
A lack of everything? Just a dark vacuum? But there is still space. Space is something, in a way, right?.
I don't think it's possible to even imagine "nothing".
Just saying that we should try to define what "nothing" is, otherwise this whole discussion is a fools game.
bastion
reply to post by edmc^2
You're still not answering the question. If you can't accept something came from nothing then how can you accept your god came from nothing? Whether or not you believe n god is irrelevant to the fact that at some point there must have been nothing and then there was something. If something created the Universe then something must have created the creator which goes into an infinite loop defying logic.
There are many competing scientific ideas about what was around before the singularity (I prefer Solid State into Big Bang Theory despite it being the best explanation for the Universe at the moment) as in a singularity all the known laws of Physics break down.
Your assertion space time always existed (which seems to be one of the reasons you believe in a god) is purely a belief and not scientifically proven.edit on 15-11-2013 by bastion because: (no reason given)
bastion
Sorry but you're not using logic, at the singularity all known laws of physics break down so they can't be used to describe what happened then. Infinity exists as a mathematical concept but that doesn't prove it existed before the Universe, it certainly doesn't prove space time is infinite therefore has always existed. That's just taking a leap of faith as a fact and building an explanation based on that.
As an applied mathematician (i.e physicist) yes I completely believe energy mass equivalence just is, as the speed of light is a constant it allows for interchangeable energy and mass which allows things to exist. I don't think this gives any indication of a creator as if it didn't hold true the Universe would have collapsed n we wouldn't be here to pose the question.
When all known laws of physics breakdown why can't something come out of nothing? There's no longer any barriers. Also you're still not answering what created the god or how there came to be a something from nothing.
bastion
Sorry but you're not using logic, at the singularity all known laws of physics break down so they can't be used to describe what happened then. Infinity exists as a mathematical concept but that doesn't prove it existed before the Universe, it certainly doesn't prove space time is infinite therefore has always existed. That's just taking a leap of faith as a fact and building an explanation based on that.
As an applied mathematician (i.e physicist) yes I completely believe energy mass equivalence just is, as the speed of light is a constant it allows for interchangeable energy and mass which allows things to exist. I don't think this gives any indication of a creator as if it didn't hold true the Universe would have collapsed n we wouldn't be here to pose the question.
When all known laws of physics breakdown why can't something come out of nothing? There's no longer any barriers. Also you're still not answering what created the god or how there came to be a something from nothing.
What makes you think the laws of the universe obey current human logic? It seems a pretty arrogant point of view to me. My experiences with quantum mech certainly lead me to believe the Universe does not function in a way that is truly understandable to humans and is very far removed from our day to day logical thought processes.
To put it simply, logic dictates we experience less than a trillion, trillion trillion, trillionth of what goes on in the current Universe so it's completely illogical to use day to day logic for the creation of it.edit on 15-11-2013 by bastion because: (no reason given)
To put it simply, logic dictates we experience less than a trillion, trillion trillion, trillionth of what goes on in the current Universe so it's completely illogical to use day to day logic for the creation of it.
Why God Exist!!!?
spy66
How can you logically explain that the infinite does not exist?
There shouldn't be any doubt about its existance if you ask me.
AfterInfinity
reply to post by edmc^2
In which case, I have a simple question for you:
Who, or what, created God? And who, or what, created God's creator?
It's a simple question, which should have a simple answer if your OP is anything to measure by.
bastion
spy66
How can you logically explain that the infinite does not exist?
There shouldn't be any doubt about its existance if you ask me.
It certainly does in mathematics but the definition of infinite when dealing with singularities. String theorists think they're not real infinities but a symptom of partial equations others that they're intrinsic with the laws of the universe.
Infinities like centres of black holes occur behind event horizons so we can't actually see them and they can't escape/influence normal space (which itself may or may not be infinite) depending on initial density thus shape.edit on 15-11-2013 by bastion because: (no reason given)
AfterInfinity
reply to post by edmc^2
I say that I'm glad I only skimmed your post because that would have been 30 seconds of my life utterly and irrevocably wasted if I had taken the time to absorb every word. Your post is nothing more or less than "Blah blah blah. So how 'bout that?"
Yeah. How 'bout that.
The universe is basically a big, empty nothingness... endless nothingness that without energy and mass and matter and heat and light... all would be empty, dark, cold.
Two physicists suggest that the Higgs had a key role in the early Universe, producing the observed difference between the number of matter and antimatter particles and determining the density of the mysterious dark matter that makes up five-sixths of the matter in the Universe.