posted on Nov, 11 2013 @ 07:46 PM
well, if the government (a.k.a the taxpayers) are paying for a place for you to live, paying for your food, paying for your healthcare, then they
pretty much already do own you so why shouldn`t you be tagged like a dog so that if you get lost you can be returned to your rightful owner?
if people decide that they don`t want to be owned and tagged then they will stop accepting government hand outs and start taking care of
seriously, is there really any difference between the slave/master relationship and the government handout/handout recipient?
The slave master "owned" the slave and provided food,shelter,clothes,healthcare, etc. if the government provides everything to keep someone alive
(food, shelter,healthcare,clothes,etc) aren`t they the master that owns that person (slave)?