reply to post by Flaunt
Give anyone a good reason to trust space agencies that are known to lie more than most governments even attempt to?
Use faulty theories to explain everything when stone age cultures clearly knew what was going on.
I would think a 5 year old could give a better analysis of many of these rocks in space than we get, and yet you want people to be quiet ??
And not wonder why Nasa has purposefully done everything they can to not show this on a much grander scale ??
If this is a electromagnetic comet, why has it not been seen before in any of the others comets that gave came by?
Comet ISON is already demonstrating the electrical characteristics that are familiar to Electric Universe proponents: multiple tails, bright jets, and the presence of carbon in large quantities. According to astronomers, the comet has “not yet” shown any indication of water vapor. The so-called “venting” of water vapor should take place as the comet gets closer to the Sun, as theory suggests.
Many articles have been written about the misrepresentations and misinterpretations from NASA scientists when it comes to comets. In fact, a major issue of fair use policy and public access to information gathered by publicly funded institutions is now being debated by Electric Universe advocates and some members of those institutions related to comets.
It's quite clear, Tallone, that your personal beliefs are driving your claims and nothing anyone says is going to sway you.
This is bad practice and completely counter-intuitive, stubborn behaviour.
There is nothing wrong with either supporting or coming up up with new theories about anything!
However, anything new has to be provable and testable to be taken seriously.
Does EU theory account for the as much of the phenomenon that currently occurs under present theories?
Is it testable by other experts?
Can these theories be proven over and over?
Where is the demonstrated evidence?
'Has anything you claim will happen to ISON ever been observed before?'
When nothing happens, will you admit the theory is flawed?
The Electric Comet applies to all comets. Comets are electric, so the theory goes. Comet ISON as far back as June this year exhibited many characteristics expected by Electric Universe theory enthusiasts. This is from an article dated back then.
Consider the following: Events on Earth, such as severe weather are not only caused by the activities of humankind, they are also the result of events coming at us from space. Some of these events are able to bring down a country’s entire power grid, and perhaps on a global scale. The Carrington Event of 1859 where CMEs destroyed much of the telegraph system in place at the time. A series of CMEs of that kind can happen again, but this time the affect would be catastrophic given our dependence on technology in pretty much all aspects of our life. ISON is by far the biggest comet to come our way in more than a thousand years. There is also possibility of direct hits on the Earth’s surface from meteorites like the one exploded over the Russian city of Chelyabinsk in February this year, blasting out windows across a large area, and hitting the ground in fragments. Comets can also hit us just as Shoemakjer-Levy-p hit Jupiter in 1994. While that giant planet has our back mopping up a multitude of ‘loose’ space objects that otherwise would be far more likely to hit us if it did not have such a very large mass, keep in mind that severe impacts from space objects do happen to Earth – the most predominant theory for the extinction of the dinosaurs.
If Comet ISON is the big fella several observers conclude it is based on an analysis of the evidence so far then it will likely bring about changes to our planet that may affect us severely, and perhaps we are already experiencing a taste of these.
Why are we getting next to NO NEWS about Comet ISON?
Near solar maxima, the Sun produces about three CMEs every day, whereas near solar minima, there is about one CME every five days.
Hey Variable, - anyone can 'chime in' anytime they like. This is a debate. But it aint an interrogation. There is a difference. I am not surprised at all that people refute it. Good on them for taking a position. At the time people refuted the claims by UN weapons inspectors that Saddam did not have WMDs, people refuted claims by independent experts there had been at least one meltdown at Fukushima. People refute my claims that evidence shows it was a western financed rebel group that used chemical weapons in Syria more than once. It's okay to be a voice of dissent, right?
EDIT Now that's enough with the side tracking of this thread. Let's get back to the discussion of ISON and the cover up by MSM and governments, whether you disagree or agree with my position. I am interested and reply from now on only about that topic - the topic of the thread.
eriktheawful was right. The Deep Impact craft is nowhere near comet ISON, and you dont understand how large space is. If you take the time to look at what they captured from that large distance, the comet is only about 5 pixels across.
reply to post by eriktheawful
My opinion is that they have had plenty of time to send a probe up close to supposedly what could be the most amazing recent Comet.
It is not my fault that you have comprehension problems. Where would it be today, we'll from September 20th when it mysteriously shut down, had they sent it towards ISON?
reply to post by Flaunt
Some people are just interested in ISON, Conspiracy theories have nothing to do with it. ~$heopleNation