swanne
The expanded Phoenix/II Theory - A Diamond at the Heart of All Matter and Energy
Plagiarizing the title of the media's reports on Nima's paper will not get you any credit with real scientists.
All the speculations in the Phoenix-I/II Theory directly come from the Standard Model's data, or observations. In the event where observations
contradicts the standard Model
Ah, yes, that thing you aggressively demanded that you didn't have to understand any of the math in in the last thread. Or have you learned how to
actually calculate scattering cross-sections, Feynman diagrams, and nucleon form factors in the past little bit? Or do you still insist you don't
need to actually go through the trouble of understanding the theory you claim to surpass?
The Phoenix-I successfully described all matter and energy particles electric charges exchanges. I quickly published these findings in an
article some time ago
Ah, yes, that article you published in the peer-reviewed, high-impact journal Nature, right?
skieswanne.weebly.com...
Oh, you mean the article you "published" on your own website. I guess the real paper is hung up in the academic bureaucracy, huh? Didn't fill out
the right forms to get it published? I bet we can expect to see it any day now when these trivial little misunderstandings are cleared up.
The Phoenix-I sparked a controversy amongst more conservative physicists.
I.e., I think it's ridiculous and shows you don't have any understanding of any physics at any level. It's not even not even wrong.
Its incomplete form was wrongfully interpreted as direct denial of the Standard Model's properties
It's more the fact that you clearly don't understand anything about the Standard Model that is the problem here.
even if the road was a lonely one, is was a wonderful one.
Ah, yes, the best, most productive scientists are the ones who complain about being persecuted and ignored, on the conspiracy forums.
The theory doesn't just explain charges anymore. Now, it expanded to a point where it explains many things all other preon models failed to
account for, such as the spin of all particles, the 3 generations, antimatter...
I eagerly await the carefully calculated nucleon form factors. Or, you know, field theory calculations of any kind.
All known particles have no more, no less than 6 preons each.
Ah, yes, as your extensive group theoretical calculation and examination of the effective Lagrangian shows. Or, rather, I'm sure, will show, once
Nature gets passed all the bureaucracy and publishes your paper.
This very suggestion already explains the charges of all particles, but also the exact mechanism during particle decay.
Yes, it explains those mechanisms that totally haven't been understood since longer than I've been alive (and were thus desperately in need of
explanation).
Compare a mainstream Feynman diagram of the phenomena, with Phoenix-I's Feynman diagram of the same phenomena
Ah, yes, as we all know, and you have grasped most of all, is that Feynman diagrams correspond to drawing lines between things. Not complicated
integrals, convoluted with ridiculous rules about vertices and propagators. Not at all.
This alone gave the theory more accuracy than most other preonic models
Of course, that diagram with lines in it connecting your assumption with your other assumption clearly is far better than any of those models those
Nobel laureates have proposed. What with their actual calculations and understanding of physics.
The expanded (speculative) Pheonix-II Model
You know, it's not fair that you get a code name for your ridiculous idea. I'm going to code name my criticism of you
Mongoose B. In
particular, the hierarchically recursive (reduced normal form)
Mongoose B Criticism.
First of all, what solid will a group of 6 preons form if they were all to have the same distance from the center of such said group? A quick
search in geometry will provide the answer: an octahedron.
A quick look at the wikipedia page for the number 6 is all that's needed to solve this conundrum! Masterful work.
The same solid than a crystal of diamond will crystallize into. In other words, inside any given elementary particles, there will always be 6
preons forming an octahedron, with one preon at each apexes.
According to than
Mongoose B theory, this argument crystallizes into you repeating your assumptions over and over again as if that counts as
proof, in each elementary mistakes, at each apexes.
One could say that around the (for now assumed to be empty) center of a group-particle
For those not familiar with this technical terminology, a "center of a group-particle" is defined by the Oxford Encyclopedic Encyclopedia of Physics
as:
dfn. Center of a Group-Particle
A term corresponding to the octahedronal apexes than a crystal of diamonds crystallizes into, vis-a-vi preons.
These positions are fixed relative to each other (except when decay occurs, where preons will be exchanged in a manner which is covered by
Phoenix-I)
Let's not forget about the
Mongoose A criticism that, no, it doesn't. Because drawing a picture with lines connecting it is not a Feynman
diagram, and neglecting to do any actual math is not a calculation of a transition amplitude.
Additionally, one could in theory assign the numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) to each of the preons inside of the octahedron.
This is a technical point--so those of you who are not professional physicists can skip this--but--correct me if I am wrong--I believe you are saying
there are
six of these made up particles. I'm not 100% sure I'm following here, this is getting awfully technical after all.
This allows only 3 rational states to be possible: apex touches Plane, vertices touches Plane, and whole face touches Plane.
I'll be honest here, I don't think you understand that an apex and a vertex is the same thing.
It is obvious the more preons are allowed to touch the plane, the more massive such a particle will become.
So obvious that no attempt at actual justification is needed.
In Phoenix-II's hypothesis, primeons, instead of being monopole-like particles, would in fact be bidirectional wave-like packets whose
e-negative curve is aligned forward in time, with their momentum direction. Their e-positive curve is facing the past.
Of course, this is after taking into account the
Mongoose B manifesto, which clearly states that reversing the polarity of the nadeon emitters
in the anti-time manifold of the time-space warp bubble will cause the matter stream to actually
reflect off of the planet's atmosphere,
resulting in two Commander Rikers materializing: one on the ship, and one on the planet.
a rendering of such a primeon would look like:
Which I have absolutely no doubt, that was created as the result of state-of-the-art particle physics simulation software available to actual
researchers, and was not at all in any way produced in photoshop.