It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
U.S. President Barack Obama said on Thursday that the world could slightly ease up on sanctions against Iran in the early stages of negotiating a comprehensive permanent deal.
"There is the possibility of a phased agreement in which the first phase would be us ... halting any advances on their nuclear program ... and putting in place a way where we can provide them some very modest relief, but keeping the sanctions architecture in place," he said in an interview with NBC News.
Kerry said that Tehran would need to prove its atomic activities were peaceful, and that Washington would not make a "bad deal, that leaves any of our friends or ourselves exposed to a nuclear weapons program".
"We're asking them to step up and provide a complete freeze over where they are today," he said on Thursday.
In Geneva, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi was cautious on the chances of an accord. "Too soon to say," he told reporters on Thursday after the first day of talks. "I'm a bit optimistic. We are still working. We are in a very sensitive phase. We are engaged in real negotiations."
Lending urgency to the need for a breakthrough was a threat by the U.S. Congress to pursue tough new sanctions on Iran.
Iran has stated that they are committed to building nuclear weapons.
InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by matafuchs
Iran has stated that they are committed to building nuclear weapons.
Was that a mistake?
They've said the opposite thing about 100 times. You should either correct the statement or provide the source. Charlatans like Alex Jones and Glen Beck don't count as sources.
g146541
reply to post by matafuchs
No star or flag for you!
Stop believing the propaganda, read some ehh?
I like the idea that Iran will be able to proceed with their needs.
I'm even ok with them getting as many nukes as the terrorists in Israel have.
But Iran has never claimed what you say about wanting nukes for blowing up the terrorist regime of Israel.
Stormdancer777
You would have to be totally in denial to think for one second Iran doesn't want nukes.
www.theguardian.com...
blogs.fas.org...
g146541
reply to post by matafuchs
No star or flag for you!
Stop believing the propaganda, read some ehh?
I like the idea that Iran will be able to proceed with their needs.
I'm even ok with them getting as many nukes as the terrorists in Israel have.
But Iran has never claimed what you say about wanting nukes for blowing up the terrorist regime of Israel.
The Russian scientist showed Iranian counterparts techniques that could be used to make smaller nuclear weapons capable of bigger explosions, according to the officials, who have been briefed on the UN atomic agency’s eight-year probe. They spoke on the condition of anonymity, following diplomatic rules for discussing private information.
The International Atomic Energy Agency is scheduled to publish this week its quarterly report on Iran’s nuclear work, in which inspectors are expected to conclude for the first time that Iran is working toward nuclear weapons. The IAEA was “increasingly concerned about the possible existence” of weapons work in its last report issued in September.
Separately, a U.S. intelligence official, speaking on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss classified information, said the U.S. hasn’t changed its judgment since a November 2007 National Intelligence Estimate and an update last year. Those reports concluded that Iran has been keeping open its options by developing capabilities short of a decision by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to build nuclear weapons.
Stormdancer777
reply to post by matafuchs
It has to be not that people really love and trust Iran that much, but that they HATE Israel.