It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Food and Drug Administration wants to rid your food of artificial trans fats once and for all. Today the FDA issued a preliminary notice that says partially hydrogenated oils — the primary source of trans fats — are no longer "generally recognized as safe." "Foods containing unapproved food additives are considered adulterated under US law, meaning they cannot legally be sold," said the FDA in a press release. Essentially, that would make it all but impossible for manufacturers to include trans fats, which have been directly linked to heart disease, in the food chain.
727Sky
It is my understanding Germany banned artificial trans fats about 15 years ago due to health concerns. Biggest thing we as consumers will notice (besides the health benefits) will be stuff that used to last a week on the shelf will not do so now. Much shorter shelf life.
butcherguy
reply to post by 727Sky
I guess my first question would be...
What food is next on the list to be banned?
Aren't there links between drinking whole milk and heart disease? Beef fat and heart disease have been linked before.
Maybe the federal government can give us a list of what we are allowed to eat, and maybe even how much we are allowed to eat.
marg6043
reply to post by nixie_nox
You nail it, my friend, people this days with the convenience of big supermarkets has lost the ability to differentiate what real fresh food taste like compare to mass produced, that are mostly transported semi frozen in order to extend shelve life, then radiated to make mature overnight.
I know I grew up in a small Island when we only went to the butcher on "kill day" to buy the meat fresh, and the fat in that meat was ugly brownish to dirty yellow but darn it tasted just as good.
My grandfather used will kill once a month and my father will bring home fresh meat.
I remember when we had to look at the eggs that we picked from the backyard to make sure they were no already with baby chicks inside and thin the rotten eggs from the good eggs it was actually fun.
Life is not longer the way it used be, you know when it was simple and a lot healthier. I grew up in that type of life and I am still alive and well it has not killed me yet, and neither any of my siblings, my mother and father are still kicking in their 70s, my husband parents the same in their 8Os.
Now they tell people to be afraid of healthy choices because everything needs to be regulated while poisoning the food with chemicals, because that is what they call healthier and sanatized.
marg6043
reply to post by nixie_nox
You nail it, my friend, people this days with the convenience of big supermarkets has lost the ability to differentiate what real fresh food taste like compare to mass produced, that are mostly transported semi frozen in order to extend shelve life, then radiated to make mature overnight.
I know I grew up in a small Island when we only went to the butcher on "kill day" to buy the meat fresh, and the fat in that meat was ugly brownish to dirty yellow but darn it tasted just as good.
My grandfather used will kill once a month and my father will bring home fresh meat.
I remember when we had to look at the eggs that we picked from the backyard to make sure they were no already with baby chicks inside and thin the rotten eggs from the good eggs it was actually fun.
Life is not longer the way it used be, you know when it was simple and a lot healthier. I grew up in that type of life and I am still alive and well it has not killed me yet, and neither any of my siblings, my mother and father are still kicking in their 70s, my husband parents the same in their 8Os.
Now they tell people to be afraid of healthy choices because everything needs to be regulated while poisoning the food with chemicals, because that is what they call healthier and sanatized.
USDA "guidelines for nutrition."
It had previously been a science group that gave these recommendations. Their recommendations were basically taken en toto and used as the advice for the public.
That is, until they recommended fewer carbohydrates (which would mean less grains) just over 30 years ago. Note: the USDA's official charter is to sell grains/agriculture.
At that point, suddenly "an independent committee" was said to have been "hired to review" the science behind their scientists' recommendations. So someone 'else' would be telling the agency what was real instead.
The documentation for the public recommendations, rather than being "a science summary for the public," became "a guideline for professionals written by 'staff members' of the agency."
Ahhh... so... more a newsletter. We're basing the health of a big nation on that lack of accountability.
Neither the committee persons, nor the staff members, nor what part either put into the resulting recommendations, was clear.
But the recommendations didn't actually match the science. Not even their OWN science which gave the original reports. So who changed that advice, and why?
Gee, it must be that new 'independent committee.' OK... who would those people be, so we can ask THEM "why?"
The USDA would not tell. They would not make clear who changed what or why nor would they reveal the names of the 'independent panel.' These reviewers are responsible for the health of 300 million people. They should be secret?
Finally repeat FOIA requests plus open pressure via scientists themselves, got the simple info of the 'scientific panel' who were said to be the responsible reviewers.
But... then it turned out that they literally "did not review" the science. Officially. "Did not review the science."
Ohhh. So what WERE they doing, again??
And then it turned out that even THAT panel's own suggestions, based on we have no idea what if they weren't reviewing the science, didn't match the actual recommendations given to the public either.
Ohhhh. So someone ELSE must have had some OTHER reason for making those 'advisory' points.
The points influencing policies for other mass-national-health agencies, and the ones pointedly driving minor things the school lunch programs and doctor recommendations.
(I wrote the above but in a private forum - redcairo)
Here's a link to some info about the FOIA stuff:
www.forahealthynation.org...
727Sky
It has been revealed that the revolving door at the FDA and large corporation CFOs who seem to get a prominent position @ FDA when something needs to be approved does shine a rather dark light on the whole process.
burntheships
This is a proof that Americans are an experiment, as its been known
for over 15 years that transfats are toxins to the body. Why
did they wait so long?