It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
- Why Won’t the West Defend Middle Eastern Christians?
- Critical of Islam
Blue_Jay33
But I know what you are saying. Perhaps we need a new sub-forum for atheists and agnostics, then when they come into this forum and post stuff like "the bible is a myth" in every thread they can be sent to there own forum.
Perhaps we need a new sub-forum for atheists and agnostics, then when they come into this forum and post stuff like "the bible is a myth" in every thread they can be sent to there own forum.
FlyersFan
beansidhe
If there is only one truth, why does nobody agree on it? It can't be that obvious.
Truth is truth. If humans can't agree what is really truth then that's not a surprise.
And even if people agreed on what truth is, that doesn't mean that they got it right.
The human animal is exceptionally stupid and stubborn.
I am a part of his flock.
Do you too want to be a part of this flock?
beansidhe
I'm confused. Are you saying I am stupid because I want to question another's stance?
wildtimes
The Abrahamics (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) are the source of ALL religious strife on this planet.
FlyersFan
wildtimes
The Abrahamics (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) are the source of ALL religious strife on this planet.
Yep. Pretty much.
I have yet to come across a nasty Wiccan or a self righteous Hindu or Buddhist.
But I've encountered plenty of Muslims and Christians who delight in the thought of
others going to hell because they worship differently then they do.
WarminIndy
So, yes, it is in other religions as well.
There is a simple answer. The Christian has a hope and continually seeks to confirm that hope. The Atheist has no hope, but is continually seeking to ensure that the hope of the Christian is not correct. Essentially, the Christian seeks the true Hope from faith (with evidence) and the Atheist hopes he is not wrong, continually trying to deny the hope of the Christian. The reason they keep coming back is because the truth is evident. When it becomes painfully evident, they will be required to either face truth or deny it completely. This is the ultimate end to anyone who rejects the truth.
Both are seeking the same answer. One denies ignorance and the other denies (ignores) truth. Ignorance is ignoring truth.
WarminIndy
reply to post by Fraudfinder
And that's the sum total of the debate, what IS the Good News?
When Jesus said it, it was not only He was the good news, but that the kingdom of God is at hand. But the good news is to bring hope, not damnation. That's where it all went wrong for Christianity, when hope was replaced by fire and brimstone preaching about hell for everyone who isn't Christian.
We are not the judges of their hearts or their eternity, that we have to leave up to God. Johnathan Edwards really took that stance in Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God. That Puritanical doctrine led to killing innocent people.
I had a pastor one time many years ago, who died in 1979 when I was young, but I remember very clearly what he said "Don't ever preach someone into hell and not preach to them hope". This pastor, and understand that my parents didn't feel the need to be faithful to church and taking us faithfully, said many practical things that stick with me today. What do you think about this...as people were judging other people for teenage pregnancies in their families, and he was against the high-minded proud, holier-than-thou people, he said something one time that I remember to this day "It is just as easy to get pregnant in the back seat of a car as it is in the back of a wagon". What he meant was that it doesn't matter, it happens to all parts of society, so quit judging on others for not being as wealthy or whatever.
Of all the preachers I have known in my life, he was the most compassionate and practical. He didn't ever preach against poor people, he never preached against those of the "lower class", which I was from.
But never preach someone into hell if you can't preach them hope. Of all the people Jesus preached to about hell, who were the ones He was talking about? The unprofitable servant, the rich man and those who do evil, even those who do it in His name.
He wasn't against the rich, He was against those who use wealth to hurt others.
wildtimes
reply to post by Fraudfinder
I am a part of his flock.
One of the weak, lost, sickly ones, I take it. All ba-a-a and no guts, but willing to pick a fight despite your ignorance.
Do you too want to be a part of this flock?
You must mean, by "this flock", the ones that create drive-by, juvenile, unsupported (and insupportable) attack posts on other members, are too cowardly to stand up and defend their assumptions or to hang in there and debate about it, and when corrected, simply RUN AWAY. Right?
Just my observation. Same as you made an observation about me. FEEL FREE to correct me if I'm wrong. WARNING: Christian newbies and fragile followers: this thread is NOT an example of intelligent discourse. Don't do things like this, and you'll be fine here, and learn something.
See what I did there?
If you (or anyone) is gonna dish it out, then be prepared to sit there like an adult and take the results of what you've sown - be a grown-up, and eat what you have reaped. Oh, but...But you can't take it, can you? Can you?!! No, you can't. All you can do is cry, "I, a sheep, am a victim."
(Pathetic).
edit on 11/7/13 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)