It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Body am I, and soul"—so saith the child. And why should one not speak like children?
But the awakened one, the knowing one, saith: "Body am I entirely, and nothing more; and soul is only the name of something in the body."
The body is a big sagacity, a plurality with one sense, a war and a peace, a flock and a shepherd.
An instrument of thy body is also thy little sagacity, my brother, which thou callest "spirit"—a little instrument and plaything of thy big sagacity.
"Ego," sayest thou, and art proud of that word. But the greater thing—in which thou art unwilling to believe—is thy body with its big sagacity; it saith not "ego," but doeth it.
What the sense feeleth, what the spirit discerneth, hath never its end in itself. But sense and spirit would fain persuade thee that they are the end of all things: so vain are they.
Instruments and playthings are sense and spirit: behind them there is still the Self. The Self seeketh with the eyes of the senses, it hearkeneth also with the ears of the spirit.
Ever hearkeneth the Self, and seeketh; it compareth, mastereth, conquereth, and destroyeth. It ruleth, and is also the ego's ruler.
Behind thy thoughts and feelings, my brother, there is a mighty lord, an unknown sage—it is called Self; it dwelleth in thy body, it is thy body.
There is more sagacity in thy body than in thy best wisdom. And who then knoweth why thy body requireth just thy best wisdom?
Thy Self laugheth at thine ego, and its proud prancings. "What are these prancings and flights of thought unto me?" it saith to itself. "A by-way to my purpose. I am the leading-string of the ego, and the prompter of its notions."
The Self saith unto the ego: "Feel pain!" And thereupon it suffereth, and thinketh how it may put an end thereto—and for that very purpose it is meant to think.
The Self saith unto the ego: "Feel pleasure!" Thereupon it rejoiceth, and thinketh how it may ofttimes rejoice—and for that very purpose it is meant to think.
To the despisers of the body will I speak a word. That they despise is caused by their esteem. What is it that created esteeming and despising and worth and will?
The creating Self created for itself esteeming and despising, it created for itself joy and woe. The creating body created for itself spirit, as a hand to its will.
Even in your folly and despising ye each serve your Self, ye despisers of the body. I tell you, your very Self wanteth to die, and turneth away from life.
No longer can your Self do that which it desireth most:—create beyond itself. That is what it desireth most; that is all its fervour.
But it is now too late to do so:—so your Self wisheth to succumb, ye despisers of the body.
To succumb—so wisheth your Self; and therefore have ye become despisers of the body. For ye can no longer create beyond yourselves.
And therefore are ye now angry with life and with the earth. And unconscious envy is in the sidelong look of your contempt.
NiNjABackflip
I suppose the ego could be one of these processes, insofar as most of us do identify ourselves. Like there is no walker, only someone walking, there is no ego, only someone identifying themselves or "egoing" themselves (for lack of a better term.)
dominicus
reply to post by coquine
anyone who possesses knowledge and experience, which others don't have, will make them always, every single time, 100% of the time make them see themselves as superior over others?
So it seems, all of this is completely above your head. IF it took me a good 8-10 years, I can imagine the possibilities of levels of misunderstanding in others.
The ego is inherently neutral, but eventually becomes the master, hence the reason for various ways of disciplining it or undergoing an ego-death. Underneath that ego death, is a reality and direct experience of an Absolute naked reality that we are all One with, prior to all thought, filters, perceptions. But I've found over the last 10 years, that very few care about Enlightenment. Only a small tiny fraction go for it, and yet it is the answer to all the worlds ills.
Oh well, I still love you & everyone else regardless
ZiggyMojoEgo loss is not attained through stepping into the shower devoid of one's material belongings. Ego Loss is MUCH deeper than that. It is an introspective state that allows you to think critically about yourself, others and reality in general without the veil of preconcieved notions. The ego is built on your conditioning, and loss of ego ultimately allows you to see beyond conditioning and human constructs such as religion, time and subjective or relative truths.
So let's try to reconcile our ideas and maybe come to an understanding. I think our differences lie only in language, and I will try my best to explain where I'm coming from, in common language, to seek the root of what it is we are talking about, what you call an ego, and the act of killing it.
I trust the combination of my senses and my mind. I require both in order to grasp something fully. So therefor, anything that doesn't come to my senses, but strictly through mind, I suspend judgement on until I have sensual confirmation. This to me is an open system of learning suitable for growth, for the sake of not having to get trapped in vicious circles of reason and imagination.
If I was to try to see the ego, feel the ego, smell the ego, hear the ego, I would be seeing, feeling, smelling and hearing myself.
This is all I have available of me to contemplate when I search for this ego. Yes I have the stories of many people discussing this word, true enough, except there is no account of its properties, what its made of, and what it is that I am supposed to kill. Because it doesn't have any properties, I must deduce that it is not an entity, nor an organ, but instead an abstract idea.
Yet I get a foul taste in my mouth when I speak of killing the ego, or blaming the ego, for actions that I myself have done. I will take full responsibility for my actions, my words and my thoughts; I do not wish to evoke aspects of me to stand in my place for judgement
The veteran who comes back without legs is not the same man because he has no legs where he used to. We change continuously, even into beings without legs, or sight.
I am that which says and thinks "I" when speaking about himself.
Why anyone would want to kill that is beyond fathoming for me at this point, as being God over one's ego is as easy as being creative. I don't think removing a part of oneself, whether concrete or abstract, could do any good.
I'm also fairly certain that many great, noble and compassionate individuals never needed to destroy this aspect of themselves to be good humans, nor did they need to stop thinking or return to their prior selves, so I will try my best to maintain my ego in the hopes that it will add to myself, rather than try to subtract from myself.
I make no claim about what anyone (including you) feels or thinks inside.
I make claim that as far as the english language goes, as far as the reality of what was said and can be communicated, to claim more knowledge than another in a specific area is to claim to be superior to them in said area.
Using the term "over your head" is for communicating an idea which is "higher" or above, ones current level of knowledge. The one holding the the idea which is "over" the others head is in the "superior" position. Using that language specifically denies a "equal but different" level.
There are many quotes in your posts which indicate your level of knowledge and experience in this area as being "over", higher, or superior to Ninja (but the majority of those use the term "most people" so include much more than him/her.
The reality in which there are different separate individuals/entities, is simultaneously existing and there is no need to "deny" it, kill it, or otherwise try to avoid it, in order to experience the others. Everything and nothing, the whole shebang is here and now, no gun shots to mark beginning, no finish line to run through.
Ego bubbles up out of that all, and eventually it pops, and another ego is bubbling up, and all of this out of the sea of creative consciousness.
On this reality, where two separate individuals are communicating with linear thought and word, though, this is only the experience of one bubble. Results may vary. I don't need to hear that you love me- because we are one anyway. But if you choose to experience being a "one" that feels a certain way about "another one" than you have that right, and I see no reason to obstruct that experience for you! Enjoy!
dominicus
Do you see you are the only person on this thread "projecting and assuming?"
I have an uncle who is a highly skilled an in demand jeweler. He is filled to the brim in knowledge of jewels, precious metals, making jewelery, etc. But when we sit down for a game of chess and some lunch, we are equals to each other and acknowledge so. Neither is their the feeling of "superiority" in him towards me, nor is there any in me towards him. Neither is there an in me towards anyone in this thread, because I experience directly that we are all One."Superiority" does not in anyway compute in my Being because I see it is an illusion.
When I study certain heavy books on physics, quantum mechanics, most of the Math is "completely over my head." Does that now mean that I see Physicists as having a superiority complex over me? No. It is entirely your own imagined projection.
Why don't you need to hear that I love you? Love is grand!!!! The Oneness is Love, as is the Soul, as is Source. Do you Love me? A complete stranger
coquine
but another simultaneous truth is that there is no I and you and others, there is just all and it is love.
Perhaps you don't see what I see and this is the cause of our schism here. I specifically work with troubled folks in drug abuse, alcoholism, sexual abuse, gang members, and the list goes on and on and on. Literally I have been in the gutter and faced, seen, the worst of the worst.
And in all of that, 1 thing has been the cause of people's problems (ego), and 1 thing has been the solution (Seeing that you are not the ego).
I personally think you've created this whole critique as nothing more than an opinion piece, structured, and justified by your own ego to keep it going. To say there is no such thing and no value, is to throw away 3000+ years of Bon, Buddhism, 2000 years of experiential Christianity, Various branches of Philosophy, Psychology, and on and on and on. Its all gone and useless if we take your route.
But unfortunately, I've been too far down the rabbit hole and seen far to much, so I can say that I would bet you all the money in the world that your wrong. What happens when Ego dies, and there is a shift away from it, is Spiritual Enlightenment, access to Infinite consciousness, to absolute naked reality, to parts of yourself you are not aware of yet.
You have not yet taken up the Path of Buddhism, or Christian Mysticism, or a number of other methods that lead to Enlightenment, for if you did, you would see that the highest value in the world is in Ego death & Enlightenment. But no, you chose to remain as you are, believing what you believe.
Is your intellect completely established, mature? What about your intuition? What about your gut instinct? Have you found your own soul?If so, where is it?
I've asked so many questions before but they go unanswered. You just repeat the same belief system over and over.
This is just part of your belief system, that's all.
Here lies the problem. I can tell you a million times what it is, & I feel like I have, but it flies over your head. There is no connection in you.
I go to these philosophy meetings here in a big city near where I live, Once a month, and there are philosophers there, scholars, professors, arm chair debaters, etc....and I've seen ego death be discussed by this group, and can see many people just dont get it. It took me 8+ years to figure it out. I doubt you comprehend any of it at this point
I have been around the world. I leterally wandered the earth for many years. I am well travelled and have met many people. I have seen the gutters, the slums, and the palaces of the world. I have seen a lot. Yet, not once an ego. How much of the world have you seen with your own eyes? I don't wish this to fall into a d**k measuring contest, but I wish to show that such assumptions about me as a person, and what I know, are completely unfounded.
Ok let's make a bet then. I will give you all the money in the world if you can show me an ego. I am aware of all my parts.
You are speaking to a former Buddhist. You are completely wrong that I have not taken up the "path of buddhism". What other assumptions have you made?
I don't wish this to fall into a d**k measuring contest, but I wish to show that such assumptions about me as a person, and what I know, are completely unfounded.
At least it is my own belief system I am repeating, and not the belief systems of other men.
Your ego is a part of your belief system, that is all. This is pointing out the obvious, but not pointing out an ego.
You can tell me what it is, but you cannot show me. Anyone can speak words.
I don't like to speak about myself, but I've spent over the last 10 years studying philosophy. I am working on my MA at this moment, and one day, my PhD. I have spent much time with topics such as these. Does this make me more knowledgeable about egos? No. Because I cannot find, nor can you show me, an ego to know.
I don't wish this to fall into a d**k measuring contest, but I wish to show that such assumptions about me as a person, and what I know, are completely unfounded.
But since you've assumed that you know more than I, and have concluded I have no clue what I'm talking about based on the very smallest of evidence, I must also conclude that you assume with everything. And thus your ego is mere assumption, presumption, and an instance of incredulity, or the knowledge of others and not your own, which you have fully admitted.
Anyone can speak words.
I think we're getting nowhere with this. I wish to stay out of such vicious circles.
Itisnowagain
reply to post by NiNjABackflip
reply to post by dominicus
The 'I' who thinks it does, is ego.
No one is doing anything - it is all done and until this is realized the 'I' (ego - the illusionary separate one) will claim everything. The 'I' will fight and defend.
All ego threads are full of claims of 'I did this and I did that'.
edit on 10-11-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)