What are the arguments against him being a valid channeller? Let's hear it.
Why is he 'ignored'?
Probably because he's just as legitimate as this guy that said he spoke to people on Venus and Pluto:
How gullible can people be?
reply to post by brazenalderpadrescorpio
and of course..why would anyone go through this ridicule who is not insane..
Its not that there are lot of Channeling fans.
But of course i know a lot of fakes But they are always also a little bit "stupid"...
Even if he would be a fraud he´d still be one of the most intelligent people i ever heard talking
And intelligent people don´t live a lie like that...
But in a way thats not the reason why i believe in it: i believe in it because no one can lie for more than 3-5 minutes without showing signs of liying ..i saw him talk for 2 hours without "leaving the flow".
At LEAST this is pure ZEN...
But whatever..Dont forget that there are a lot of very young people on Ats. When i was young i would not have been open to this.edit on 5-11-2013 by kauskau because: (no reason given)
reply to post by Vasa Croe
What are the arguments against him being a valid channeller? Let's hear it. And I don't want just flimsy style arguments, I want a 'debate forum' post. I want that type of quality.
reply to post by MarioOnTheFly
I'm done arguing. I'm not going to accept your view, and you're not going to accept mine. Would you disagree? If you don't then let's just accept that it's all a load of wasted energy.
reply to post by kauskau
This guy talks about a previous incarnation on this planet and then says later that he never existed on this planet.