It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anomalies From Mars, With Curiosity

page: 2
7
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2013 @ 02:24 PM
link   

florentb
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


Hello,

See Strange rocksplease !



Ok, I looked.

What's so strange about them?




posted on Nov, 4 2013 @ 02:27 PM
link   

florentb
reply to post by redoubt
 


Hello redoubt,
Thank you for response. If I can, I may present in the future rocks who could be fossils or parts of structures, or anything I don't know what. Every day some "rocks" who have some intriguing form (or shape) are Under my eyes, and even it could be only "rocks" I find in any case these having interest. But you could have a surprise !


Sure, please feel free.



posted on Nov, 4 2013 @ 04:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


First, you can look the symetric shapes. May be the word "strange" is unusual in English. You have also the word "weird" (i discovered it recently) I do not understand the difference between the two words ! I don't know for you but stones who have the two sides absolutely identical, isn't it strange ? They are so numerous in a so little area !



posted on Nov, 4 2013 @ 04:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


First, you can look the symetric shapes. May be the word "strange" is unusual in English. You have also the word "weird" (i discovered it recently) I do not understand the difference between the two words ! I don't know for you but stones who have the two sides absolutely identical, isn't it strange ? They are so numerous in a so little area !



posted on Nov, 4 2013 @ 04:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


First, you can look the symetric shapes. May be the word "strange" is unusual in English. You have also the word "weird" (i discovered it recently) I do not understand the difference between the two words ! I don't know for you but stones who have the two sides absolutely identical, isn't it strange ? They are so numerous in a so little area !



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 05:59 AM
link   
reply to post by florentb
 


See more Strange rocks !



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 06:35 AM
link   
reply to post by florentb
 


Hey Florentb, please learn to upload photos, your threads will get alot more readers/comments etc.

See the bar across the top of the screen, with buttons marked "home", "top" "new" etc?

After "logout" See the little circle with a "v" or downwards arrow in it?

Click that. Another bar appears underneath it. Click uploads. I expect that you can work out the rest yourself


Many readers will get irritated or put off by having to go to an external site to view your pics - uploading does not usually take very long



edit on 6-11-2013 by skalla because: typo



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 07:25 AM
link   
reply to post by florentb
 




You have also the word "weird" (i discovered it recently) I do not understand the difference between the two words ! I don't know for you but stones who have the two sides absolutely identical, isn't it strange ?

But Earth has "weird" rocks all over the place.

We don't consider all of them as signs of alien doings...

What is the difference here?



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 07:41 AM
link   
reply to post by skalla
 


Hello skalla and thanks so much !

I tried to upload directly in my post and got nothing except a little white thing !

Now I have the window !



edit on 6 11 2013 by florentb because: (no reason given)


It works !
edit on 6 11 2013 by florentb because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 07:51 AM
link   
Hello, yes they are strange/weird rocks. Thanks for sharing.
Unfortunatly NASA/powers that be/religious people and sceptics on ATS can not allow anything more than strange rocks.
In my eyes there was an ancient civilisation on Mars. A tecnologically advanced civilisation which seems to have disapeared. If this hypothesis is true then this would have huge implications for the technoligically advanced civilisation on earth. We might start and care for the future more lest we go the way of the Martians.



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
 


Hello,
Well said (in French "Bien dit")

Sceptics ? You mean "rocks", don't you !?



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by florentb
 


For skalla, in thanks :



It's one of my favorites !



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 01:53 PM
link   

florentb
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
 


Hello,
Well said (in French "Bien dit")

Sceptics ? You mean "rocks", don't you !?
some people are rocks and some are rolling stones.



posted on Nov, 12 2013 @ 11:59 AM
link   
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
 


When you put an image of rocks with a stange form, they says "rocks", when you put a true evidence (ex. the 2 images uploaded in this thread) simply nobody is there ! But it is no important, everybody is own opinion.
For my part, on Allvoices, Agoracosmopolitain, ireportCNN, I continue to publish articles, showing images, real questioning images.

Regards.



posted on Nov, 12 2013 @ 01:13 PM
link   
reply to post by florentb
 


Never give in, florentb ... for those of us here on ATS who've seen strange formations on the martian surface, it's always hard to convince the rest. Sometimes it's even impossible to get through to the "it's just rocks" crowd.

IMO some of what's been imaged by Curiosity up to now is indeed weird, even when taking into account various geological processes to explain certain features and shapes.

So just hang on in there and don't stop looking!



posted on Nov, 15 2013 @ 03:00 AM
link   
reply to post by jeep3r
 


Hello,

In consequence to my thread www.abovetopsecret.com...

(It was about some pièces of rock on Mars might be from a statue)

, I am coming back this morning with the right (and long) NASA link wrote on a piece of paper to reply a member and I've lost it in "myATS" and the link doesn't work for me. I hope it has not been censored (but it could be).

Regards.



posted on Nov, 15 2013 @ 03:42 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 15 2013 @ 04:01 AM
link   
reply to post by florentb
 


Thanks, I've starred and flagged your other thread, although I didn't leave a comment yet. Artifical or not, some of the features seen up to now seem to display strange geometries and details that sometimes make it hard to believe it's just 'rocks' ...

Don't want to derail your thread, but you may be interested in this formation imaged by Curiosity on Sol 64. If it's just a rock, it's got some very unique properties to it:





Source Image NASA/JPL

When taking into account potential erosional effects and the dust-cover (that's almost everywhere on the surface), I think it's absolutely not insane to question whether this is really just another rock formation or perhaps something else ...
edit on 15-11-2013 by jeep3r because: text



posted on Nov, 15 2013 @ 04:23 AM
link   
reply to post by jeep3r
 


Yes, I understand what you mean. Even if I do not know if you are right, I have found an image who prove (you call that "dust") is recovering much of the "rocks". Sand and (humidity ?) aggregation. An image who shows there is something Inside "rocks".
I can't post this image like that (and have no intention to post any image on ATS now). I must write a complete article with arguments, for people like you who are really involved by this topic. I do not know when I'll have the time for that.
Best Regards.



posted on Nov, 15 2013 @ 07:11 AM
link   
reply to post by florentb
 

Yes i know how you feel. This thread is typical A.T.S. www.abovetopsecret.com...



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join