It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
IT'S designed as a military killing machine
No semi-auto weapon should be banned except for short barralled shotguns. As for automatics? Ban them all!
Bob Sholtz
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
No semi-auto weapon should be banned except for short barralled shotguns. As for automatics? Ban them all!
really? how many mass shootings in the u.s. have occurred with fully automatic weapons? two, possibly three. EVER.
the tool doesn't matter, it is the intent that matters. our society and morals are degrading; people have become hateful and selfish. this is the true killer.
EarthCitizen07
Bob Sholtz
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
No semi-auto weapon should be banned except for short barralled shotguns. As for automatics? Ban them all!
really? how many mass shootings in the u.s. have occurred with fully automatic weapons? two, possibly three. EVER.
the tool doesn't matter, it is the intent that matters. our society and morals are degrading; people have become hateful and selfish. this is the true killer.
Your point is irrellevant. If they had automatic weapons the victims would have been many, many times more than with the semi-auto used. Crazy people exist and will use whatever weapon they have in their arsenal. butter knife, machette, hammer, etc.
Machine guns have too much killing potential. This is basic logic everyone should be able to understand.
Doc Gator
riffraff
Anyway my point, and I bet we'll agree on this, is if I could get hit by a round and survive I would much rather get hit with the 5.56. There would be more of me left after I had healed. The 7.62 is more destructive.
I would not agree. I would much rather not be shot by either. But, having seen wounds from both, I would much prefer to be hit by a 7.62x39 (AK47 round) than a 5.56 NATO round. The AK rounds tends to pass through tissue, while the AR rounds tend to fragment. This makes treatment significantly more difficult and raises the lethality level of the round. This is one of the main reasons that the Russians rechambered for the 5.45 round when they introduced the AK74.
There is always a trade off. The 7.62x39 has more "stopping" power, but the 5.56 NATO is significantly more destructive to tissue.
NavyDoc
NO, his point is quite relevant. Murders with legally owned NFA weapons have been very rare and thus it is illogical to want them eliminated. Also, I disagree with a FA causing many, many more casualties. If you burn out your mag into the ceiling (unlike in the movies, FA handhelds are not easy to control) you waste much of the rounds.
AlphaHawk
IT'S designed as a military killing machine and instead it's doing its job slaughtering the innocent in shopping malls, schools and cinemas across America.
The gun that's killing America is a lightweight, easy to handle assault rifle that has become a lethal weapon in the hands of losers, misfits and people with a grudge.
Gun enthusiasts call it the "iPhone" of gun shops.
Lethal weapon: This is the gun that is killing America
Oh boy.
Boy oh boy oh boy, so this 'story' is doing the rounds on Australian news sites at the moment, well on Newscorp sites at least.
I haven't read it yet, but the snippet above is already full of fallacies, such as calling the AR an assault rifle.
So the gun debate continues it seems, here in Australia the article will be preaching to the already converted, as most Australians fear guns, rather than respect and understand them.
It's infuriating to read such tripe, (I'm not surprised though, it is a newscrap story) because anyone could go find motor vehicle death statistics and compare with gun deaths and see that more people die from cars than guns, yet here we are, fearing guns.
Yes, there are psychos out there, and if it wasn't an AR, it would be something else..the weapon doth make a man a murderer.
edit on 4-11-2013 by AlphaHawk because: (no reason given)
TKDRL
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
They are also hot, don't bleed as much as a knife wound. A nice fluid motion with my knife, victim is dead plain and simple. Multiple arteries and vessels will be severed. No coming back from that. People survive being shot in the abdomen all the time.
EarthCitizen07
TKDRL
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
They are also hot, don't bleed as much as a knife wound. A nice fluid motion with my knife, victim is dead plain and simple. Multiple arteries and vessels will be severed. No coming back from that. People survive being shot in the abdomen all the time.
A knife is more deadly up close and personal, but you only kill the person you intend to harm and everyone else remains intact. A gun has more killing potential, and a full auto weapon ten fold that.
Stopping a crazy person from killing 50 people with a semi-auto is much easier than stopping a crazy person with a full auto. There is a much greater window of opportunity available. Full auto spits 5 to 10 bullets per second versus 1-2 per second with semi-auto. Someone is bound to whip out their pistol and shoot the crazy person, or at the very least people have a chance to run away. With full auto everyone is dead within a few seconds.