It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WOW! Stone Hut on mars Sol 728 captured by Spirit rover ?

page: 11
101
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 03:53 AM
link   
So if their program is correct, 32cm's are visible above the dune. It can't possibly calculate how much of the rock/structure is hidden behind said dune.

??




posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 07:30 AM
link   
reply to post by breadinspector
 




The same people who sent spacecraft into space put the mirrors up there. The US government has been travelling to space long before the 1960s, the black projects got a hold of the vimanika shastra and used the text to design spacecraft and this was done before most "astronmers" were even able to use their modern telescopes to see the planets.

So somehow the US government did this before the US ever even existed back when Galileo was looking at the planets????

Just how does that work?


BTW wasn't the vimanika shastra actually written in the early 20th century and not by the ancient Hindus as it was "advertised"??

And since you had mentioned evidence, I had asked for your evidence, but where is it?
edit on 11/6/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 08:00 AM
link   

intelligenthoodlum33
So if their program is correct, 32cm's are visible above the dune.

The measurement was in from side to side, not the height of the rock.


It can't possibly calculate how much of the rock/structure is hidden behind said dune.

Obviously, but what is the relevance of that?



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 08:12 AM
link   

Chamberf=6
reply to post by breadinspector
 




The same people who sent spacecraft into space put the mirrors up there. The US government has been travelling to space long before the 1960s, the black projects got a hold of the vimanika shastra and used the text to design spacecraft and this was done before most "astronmers" were even able to use their modern telescopes to see the planets.

So somehow the US government did this before the US ever even existed back when Galileo was looking at the planets????

Just how does that work?


BTW wasn't the vimanika shastra actually written in the early 20th century and not by the ancient Hindus as it was "advertised"??

And since you had mentioned evidence, I had asked for your evidence, but where is it?
edit on 11/6/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
The Antithiquero Mechanism(if that is the correct spelling) proves we are at least 1500 hundred years behind the secret knowledge.
I wonder how advanced we will be in 1500 years?
edit on 6-11-2013 by symptomoftheuniverse because: spelling



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 08:29 AM
link   
reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse
 

It's a cool mechanism, no doubt.

But how does that relate to breadinspectors post?



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 09:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


Im just postulating that the u.s government or whoever could have achieved anything in galileos time.
edit on 6-11-2013 by symptomoftheuniverse because: spelling



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 09:46 AM
link   
Its just an ice crystal on the lens and/or some dead pixels on the CCD Sensor.

reply to post by ArMaP
 



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 10:52 AM
link   


The indian space agency is controlled by the illuminati just like NASA dont expect any truth from them.
The evidence is on a godlikeproductions thread started by john lear. but they mention some of it in this video.


Got any proof of that?



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 01:31 PM
link   

symptomoftheuniverse
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


Im just postulating that the u.s government or whoever could have achieved anything in galileos time.
edit on 6-11-2013 by symptomoftheuniverse because: spelling


Like put mirrors around the planets? Fly to Jupiter and beyond? Where did the record of these abilities disappear to over the last 400 years?

I guess I'm missing the point and also confused how people allude to the US government "hiding" planets from Galileo and others using his telescope designs and when the US didn't even exist then... and breadinspector's posts make no sense.
edit on 11/6/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 01:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


Lol who knows?



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


The relevance is that is a bit disingenuous to keep telling us that there is nothing to see here when we (all of us) can't see all of the object.



edit on 11/6/2013 by intelligenthoodlum33 because: wanted to be nicer



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 02:43 PM
link   
reply to post by intelligenthoodlum33
 

So do you think that it is 32 cm. at the top then grows dramatically below to form a "hut"?

Just trying to understand what you're getting at.

Not only the "hut" is smaller than it appears, but the dune would be as well.

edit on 11/6/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


Preeetty sure I didn't mention anything about a hut. I am saying that we can't be sure exactly what it is, because (wait for it) we can't see all of it.

Not knowing something does not diminish us in anyway. However, pretending we know does.



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 02:53 PM
link   

intelligenthoodlum33
The relevance is that is a bit disingenuous to keep telling us that there is nothing to see here when we (all of us) can't see all of the object.

Saying that what we see is 32 cm wide is not saying that there is nothing to see here, is adding real information, based on the images available.

Saying that a rock can be 32 cm wide and just the tip of something else doesn't help in any way, it's the same as saying that behind the rock, in the distance, could be a building with neon lights.



posted on Nov, 6 2013 @ 02:57 PM
link   
reply to post by intelligenthoodlum33
 

That's right, you said "rock/structure", sorry... but that's why I asked. To understand what you were getting at--like I said.

I put no words in your mouth, but the thread IS about a "hut" after all.

edit on 11/6/2013 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 11:31 AM
link   
Cant say if that is a hut or not, looks out of place very weird indeed.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 03:08 PM
link   
Probably where the Mars Iguana lives.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 09:22 PM
link   

CAPT PROTON
but then if it is a pile of rocks stacked together then it isn't natural is it and if its a rock with many holes that look like a stack of rocks then there something wrong with that picture too..


All of those things can and do happen in nature. Weather and debris flows cause rocks to become stacked on top of each other as they are moved about, also water of course (ever been to a rock beach or mountainous area?)

Its most likely a volcanic rock, they cool down containing pockets of gas (or vesicles), these pockets break through weathering and such they give the pocketed look.

An example as already said on here is pumice with its distinctive vesicular texture.

edit on 7-11-2013 by rocksandstuff because: Clarity



posted on Nov, 8 2013 @ 10:41 PM
link   
This is not what you're thinking, It is just a rock
(the right side one)

That hut is just a rock like the rock in left, use brightness and make the picture black n white or negative.The way in which the photo is taken there is difference between the light at your hut and the left rock.



posted on Nov, 9 2013 @ 09:34 AM
link   
Ohh the Irony of it all .. how quaint !


it sees something out of the ordinary then stops working ?






First of all, a rock like many other rocks is not something out of the ordinary, it's precisely the opposite.

Second, the photo was taken in 2006 (in January 19, if my calculations are right), so it wasn't a case of seeing something and then stopping, as the stopping happened years later.





but then if it is a pile of rocks stacked together then it isn't natural is it and if its a rock with many holes that look like a stack of rocks then there something wrong with that picture too..

What's wrong with the picture?



goes to the Question of the Monolith on Phobos to which BUZZ ALDRIN has Mentioned! Who put it there Who Put it there We didn't Put it There God Put it there well something like that in that Line of words he has said.. and this si comming from a Employee of NASA dont for get he Old and has nothing to Loose..
like Mitchell too.. Cooper..and Armstrong's Hidden Layer Speech Etc.. Ya think They Know something the Public Doesn't...



Why do you say that, because he said there's a rock in one of the moons of Mars (although he said "the moon of Mars, as if it had only one)?


Mars rover Spirit has unexplained computer reboots
phys.org...

Mars rover Spirit has unexplained computer reboots
www.abovetopsecret.com...

"Unexplained" Forces Keep Mars Rovers Moving

01/13/2008
www.thunderbolts.info...

Spirit Suffers Memory Gaps and Unexplained Resets
www.marsdaily.com...

now the Question is ! memory Gaps unexplained resets or Does NASA Want to COVER what they DISCOVERED !!!



Well ok.. but there is plenty of time these rovers just stopped working for no apparent reason then starts to function again yet the data of information still continues or its just switched off for some apparent reason there is a thread on ATS that explains this !! not sure what its is called about the unexplained Data they haven't reviled to the Public as of yet..




What Wrong with the Picture ???? Well explain to me how those Holes got there that Look like rocks..
its either something Like CORAL!!!!!! eh... you know Life at one point on Mars...


The Rock on Phobos is very high and long and out of the Norm!! for this Asteroid like Moon ! and it the Only ROCK ( Monolith ) this Shows this type of out of the Ordinary

Phobos monolith
en.wikipedia.org...

Mars monolith

The Mars monolith is a rectangular boulder discovered on the surface of Mars.[1] It is located near the bottom of a cliff, which it likely fell from in the past.[1][2] The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter took pictures of it from orbit, roughly 180 miles (300 km) away.[1]

en.wikipedia.org...:The_Mars_Monolith.jpg
en.wikipedia.org...


Well this here is kinda interesting on the Surface of Mars!! Something right out of 2001 space odyssey!!


[url= upload.wikimedia.org...]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/The_Mars_Monolith.jpg[/url ]
edit on 9-11-2013 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
101
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in

join