George Zimmerman Left Wife, Shellie, Bullet-Riddled Target As Threat: Report

goou111
The former wife of George Zimmerman says ....

She's been caught calling the police and telling lies about George Zimmerman.
She's been caught telling lies to the court system as well on other matters.
She should have been arrested for making false reports to the police about Zimmerman
the last time. She got off easy. THe police just dropped the matter.
Honestly, I wouldn't trust her as far as I could throw her. (which isn't far)

goou111
The guy got away with murdering a 17 year old kid.

That's your opinion. The facts that came out in the trial said otherwise.
I thought he was guilty of manslaughter ... until the facts came out.

But his wife is the one that's crazy right?

She's made fake police calls on George Zimmerman and made false assault reports.
She's also made it clear that she wants the money in his 'legal defense fund'
because she thinks she should get half in the divorce. (she shouldn't)

So is she crazy? No. She's just a trashy liar.

She could be telling the truth this time ... maybe .... but because of her
recent past nefarious actions, she just can't be trusted.

reply to post by goou111


Did you read the information on that supposed assault on an officer? No .. didn't think so.
ALL CHARGES WERE DROPPED. Know why?
Because it was in a bar and the cop was drunk at the bar harassing a friend of Zimmermans.
So Zimmerman helped his friend. The drunk cop got nasty about it.
The cop involved was a total D**** and the courts knew it.

Oh .. and that happened like almost a decade ago.
If Zimmerman had a violent history, he would have had actual arrests
and many more of them during that time. HE DID NOT.

goou111
So lets see that's 6 different violent incidents with 6 different people and the only thing they all have in common is your "saint" George Zimmerman..

'your saint George Zimmerman' ??? Amateur strawman ...
Your examples were proven to be faked and proven to be self defense.
Epic failure.

goou111
Hello all

sry if this has been posted I did not see it.

The former wife of George Zimmerman says he nailed a bullet riddled marksman target to the wall as a threat to her.

He said, she said. They're going through a divorce. Almost every woman smears the guy during these proceedings. She's just hedging her bets because if George writes a book and makes some money off it, she wants some of that cash as well.

It also could have been this way...

George: Hey Babe! Check it out, I'm getting better with my shot group.

Shellie: OMG! YOU"RE TRYING TO KILL ME!

George: Huh? Oh really? Give it a rest.

It's tough murdering someone getiing away with it
and then going about life like nothing happened.Just ask OJ Simpson.
It eventually makes its way to the surface.
This tells me that just like OJ, the jury was fooled by amazing lawyers.
The man is a ticking time bomb. Mark my words.
The Universe and Karma ? Not so easy to fool.

sealing
It's tough murdering someone getiing away with it


This tells me that just like OJ, the jury was fooled by amazing lawyers.
.

edit on 3-11-2013 by sealing because: Grammar

edit on 3-11-2013 by sealing because: More

Did you watch the trial? Zimmermans lawyer was a lot of things, but amazing wasnt one of them. Even his opening statements were a train wreck.
It was actually the prosecution that saved Zimmerman. Virtually every one of the witnesses backed up the defense.

The police on the scene knew it wasn't murder. The jury with all the facts knew it wasn't murder. But if you want to keep on parroting the lies that the machine sold you, keep on discrediting yourself.

reply to post by FlyersFan


i read that it was a undercover sting and saw his lawyer say it during the trial.
can you point to a source for the drunk cop. that's even better, if true.

reply to post by hounddoghowlie


Info Here This article contains the information in the incident that was made public.
I've read elsewhere on here that it was a sting operation but the undercover cops
were so obnoxious and belligerent that there was a question of them drinking while
being 'undercover' at the bar and that's why the court system dropped the charges
against Zimmerman.

I don't remember which of the MANY threads that information was on. I'd have to hunt for it.

reply to post by FlyersFan


thanks, i'll go read it.
the main thing is the charges were dropped. they couldn't charge him, so no conviction.

something people forget is that cops make up all kind of charges when they arrest you.
they pile them on, you could fart on them, and that resisting with a deadly weapon.

reply to post by goou111


Come on! Don't be naive. I think his wife is wanting her 15 minutes.

She stated she was upset because she felt he wasn't there for her after his trial. So she is divorcing him and they are fighting. Yet all the things she claims are these threats that are never quite of an investigatable nature.

He isn't going to barely get away with his life, trying to save his name, and then he's going to make regular threats that would use guns?

Sorry no, bit if you were trying ro make him look bad this is EXACTLY how you would do it.

goou111

He needs to stop jerking when he pulls the trigger, and just slowly pull it without trying to anticipate when it will go off. Maybe a more sensitive trigger, cheap guns have a tendency to have a rather heavy trigger pull. He can also aim a little more upper right to compensate, too bad we don't have the distance on that, but I don't think he can hit anything outside of 20 feet...

Wait what was the point here again?

goou111
reply to post by hounddoghowlie

 

Why are so many people so eager to defend this guy.

Maybe she is truly scared that he will shoot her and not being vindictive at all

why defend this guy?...because he shot a black kid who he thought was a punk, that gave him crap, and he had a CC permit....and legally got away with it...white supremacists were impressed and felt vindicated.

While we are discussing Shellie Zimmerman's credibility as a witness to anything, can someone explain why it wasn't deemed necessary for her to get on the stand to verify that George really left the house to "just go to the store," when he said he did? Surely if doubt could have been raised about this aspect of his story, that would have affected how any jury would have viewed his credibility regarding the rest of it? Say the prosecution had rattled Shellie into admitting that she didn't notice what time he left the home exactly, and for all she really knew, he could have been out looking for "assholes" to chase off for the previous hour or so? Would that not have had a strong influence on the jury's mind set when they were evaluating the rest of his version of events?

reply to post by jimmyx


Stop bringing race into it. He shot a PERSON who was attacking him.

He's not racist. That's pretty much confirmed.

reply to post by IvanAstikov


Spousal privilege, we still have that in the U.S., and not only that she had a trial coming up against her.
and if i'm not mistaken, any testimony she could have given, that might be related to hers could be used against her.

reply to post by IvanAstikov


Ask the prosecution. It wouldn't have really changed anything since the timeline and story made by the phone calls pretty much confirms his story.

Either way it should have never gone to trial and it wouldn't have changed the fact he was defending himself.

reply to post by IvanAstikov

Seriously dude ... are you going to try to 'retry' this here, yet again?

Before the trial I thought he was guilty of manslaughter.
But the facts in the trial proved that he wasn't.
It was a case of idiot and idiot coming together on a dark stormy night.
Both had the right to be where they were.
No one knows who threw the first punch.
The fatal shot was fired in self defense.
Case closed.

GogoVicMorrow
He's not racist. That's pretty much confirmed.

His black high school girlfriend was happy to confirm that he's not.

reply to post by FlyersFan

Seriously dude ... are you going to try to 'retry' this here, yet again?

I'm just raising what I thought was a valid concern, considering that most of the sympathy for George's predicament revolved around him just being a well-intentioned citizen going about his own business, when someone aroused his suspicions and made him change his plans. Would his story really have been viewed in the same light, had he admitted he'd been acting under the capacity of his NW duties and been been patrolling the neighbourhood for 4 hrs? Or even 10 minutes, if he's left the house carrying his firearm, knowing full well it is against NW policy and leaves them open to a lawsuit?