It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obamacare, part of a global effort to reduce the surplus population?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 09:47 AM
link   
The "powers that be" need a rapid decline in population but don't want to look like it is "man made".

Why does the world need it, environmentalism, NO, but because soon

robots and technology will be eliminating most jobs.

The 3D printer, once perfected will eliminate 3/4 of manufacturing jobs. Already nearly every aerospace item has 3D printed parts. And yes, 3D printed metal parts. The 3D printer will be on best buy shelves within 3 years at a cost lower than most high end computers.

When robots can clean better than humans, manufacture better than humans, then the need for humans to support the "powers that be", then excess human beings are no longer needed for the people who run the world on such a massive scale that we have now

How to acheive this: these are NOT moral judgments, just what I am observing.

Get people so addicted to porn, that real sex becomes nearly impossible, an epidemic even in the US. My husband does a lot of marriage counseling and sees this quite frequently. I have read many studies on just this subject, that repeated and prolonged use of porn leads to impotence with a real woman and disappointment with a real man.

Glamorize and socially sanction and promote homosexuality through saturation in the media TV/Movies. This will reduce the surplus population. It is a rare TV show or movie that does not have at least one very fun, very hip, educated and "enlightened" gay person in it.

Allow misogyny and promote it as cultural sensitivity; ie leave the world cultures alone which oppress women so badly they euthanize and abort female infants; and females would rather kill themselves than marry; and husbands and fathers can kill females at will with no consequences. It is little known that in Iran fathers who love their educated daughters are not forcing them to marry, they too are having a decline in population. One Arabic country is going so far as to actually build a city for women only, no men allowed. This will attract many women whose fathers don't want their daughters beat regularly by spoiled and self-indulgent men with no self control. The spread of Islam will quickly increase the number of females who refuse to marry and their fathers love them enough not to force them to.

Allow and sanction pedophilia (there is a movement afoot to do just that, search other posts and you will find threads on just this subject), this will so terrorize a generation of young people into hating sex that they will choose chastity over relationships

Allow or turn a blind eye to sex selective abortion. It reduces the population faster by ten folds because of the societal preference for male children world wide.

Don't be fooled that this a a phenomenon. It is planned by the leaders of the world to reduce the surplus population that will not be needed in the future.

Obamacare as it is rolling out is sure to cause excess deaths because of nearly 2 million people being thrown out of their insurance plans because they don't meet Obama standards. Also the website is only allowing a handful of people to register each day. Leaving millions more uninsured than before the roll out. Also, there ARE deep rationing plans for seniors which will disallow life extending (saving) procedures if one is above a certain age. Already socialized medicine and Obamcare will/does so limit healthcare to seniors that the senior population will be reduced much faster than before, all in the name of "good" healthcare for all.

Once again let me emphasize, these are NOT MORAL JUDGEMENTS, just observations. Maybe the powers that be are correct, we will need to drastically reduce the surplus population as quickly as possible with the coming of the "star trek" technology that will be on our shelves within 10 years or far less. Maybe these things are the most "painless" ways of reducing the population because if we don't there will be such massive unemployment and poverty that we risk total chaos and anarchy.

What say you??? Just don't jump on my about morality, that is not what this is about.
edit on 2-11-2013 by grandmakdw because: make the purpose of the OP clearer




posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 09:50 AM
link   
I think there must be a Obama Thread EVERY day lately on ATS.



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by coolcatt
 


Actually, this thread is not really about Obama, it is about the global effort to reduce the surplus population using stealth means.

Obamacare is simply one tiny part, maybe if I said "homosexuality" a part of the global effort to reduce the surplus population you would have been happier? Or Islamic misogyny, or pornography, or adult/child sex. Which title should I have used?

Tell me which title I should have used - or moderator - change the title if you can to one of the above - or tell me how to change it and what would be more acceptable.
edit on 2-11-2013 by grandmakdw because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 10:26 AM
link   
Maybe it would be better if they just shot us instead of making us suffer to reduce the population.
Seems more humane to me

edit on 2-11-2013 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 10:33 AM
link   

rickymouse
Maybe it would be better if they just shot us instead of making us suffer to reduce the population.
Seems more humane to me

edit on 2-11-2013 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)


Funny

but if they did that, people would riot and create chaos thereby threatening the plans of the powers that be

no they have to make it look like these things are to be encouraged in the name of tolerance, cultural sensitivity, and understanding people who have no other choice but to love and have sex with whom they want (ie pedophiles)


edit on 2-11-2013 by grandmakdw because: poor initial word choice



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 10:53 AM
link   

grandmakdw
reply to post by coolcatt
 


Actually, this thread is not really about Obama, it is about the global effort to reduce the surplus population using stealth means.

Obamacare is simply one tiny part, maybe if I said "homosexuality" a part of the global effort to reduce the surplus population you would have been happier? Or Islamic misogyny, or pornography, or adult/child sex. Which title should I have used?

Tell me which title I should have used - or moderator - change the title if you can to one of the above - or tell me how to change it and what would be more acceptable.
edit on 2-11-2013 by grandmakdw because: (no reason given)


I'll tell you nothing



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by grandmakdw
 

All of which are failing miserably as indicated by the growth in the population. Or this is merely an unfounded rant.....



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 01:25 PM
link   
reply to post by yorkshirelad
 


You are looking at old data my friend. The population of nearly all industrialized countries is in major decline. To the point where Japan is encouraging teen pregnancy.

There no longer is a population explosion, we are now in population implosion.



posted on Nov, 2 2013 @ 06:30 PM
link   

yorkshirelad
reply to post by grandmakdw
 

All of which are failing miserably as indicated by the growth in the population. Or this is merely an unfounded rant.....


Replacement rate is considered 2.1 not one European country is at replacement rate, most are below 1.5


http:/ /epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/images/e/e8/Total_fertility_rate%2C_1960-2011_%28live_births_per_woman%29.png

In North America, the US is below replacement rate, Canada is way below replacement rate and Mexico is just .01 above replacement rate.

Every country in the entire world has seen a huge decline in birth rates. With every single industrialized country coming in at under 2.1
data.worldbank.org...

In the countries with above replacement rates also have astronomical infant mortality rates.

www.indexmundi.com...

I know of which I speak darlin.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 08:45 PM
link   
reply to post by grandmakdw
 


The initial post is wrong. The countries around the world are trying to increase their populations like in Europe and Russia. In Europe they have immigrated countless people in order help out their population problems. I was in Sweden and it looked like a third world country because of all the immigrants.

Their is no population world wide problem that is a lie. The world has a population implosion. And it going to get worse In China men cant even find wives.

And reducing poverty and unemployment is not a justification for destroying societies by destroying morals,families and killing babies through abortions. If this was their plan and you agree with it than its similar and even worse than acting like the atheist Communists or Hitler.

And in reality reducing the population will not fix the current or future poverty or unemployment problems. Their are massive unemployment and poverty problems in countries especially in Europe that do not have enough of a population. And all throughout history their was massive poverty and unemployment and the world had less people. The elite do not care about reducing poverty or unemployment because they dont care for the common man.


Again their is no no worldwide population reduction plan. Its just that most of the people who control the world are immoral and promote their sick lifestyles on everyone. That is why you see promotion abortion,homosexuality and other immoral actions. The elite are immoral ungodly people thats why these lifestyles are being promoted.

However I will not rule that their might be a small population attack on certain types of people but thats not for the sake of poverty or helping humanity. But its only because most of the elite hate certain types of people like Christians thats why they target christian societies especially when it comes to Christian morals!



Instead of this fake population reduction crap. People should find real ways to help humanity like actually creating jobs and decreasing wasteful spending and promoting voluntary charity and promoting the family and Christianity which should be the foundation of societies. The best society is one that puts God and family first. When God/Christianity/morals and the family is being attacked how is society supposed to function correctly. And how are people supposed successfully fight poverty and unemployment when they are lost. How can people care enough to help humanity when they dont even properly love or help out their own Families or God.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join