It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Talk Already Starting About Gun Control

page: 6
17
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:12 PM
link   
reply to post by rickm
 


Shall I define the term you used?? Cower, as in not engaging back to you???

I take my statement back. You probably aren't playing the ignorant fool. It appears that you are basically trolling a thread.




posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by jrod
 


Second calling out on a person.



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by macman
 


so then there should be zero gun laws whatsoever?

nice to know you could care less that felons and mentally unstable should have guns



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:14 PM
link   
reply to post by macman
 


just pointing out ignorance is all i am doing.

people making comments without being able to back them up



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by jrod
 


actually i am not trolling

i am waiting for an answer i asked about an ignorant post



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by rickm
 


And when did I state that??? Care to point that out.

The 2nd Amendment is very clear.
If it is to be changed, the correct process needs to happen.



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:25 PM
link   
reply to post by rickm
 


Being able to back what up???

Your tactic is nothing new here, hate to break it to you.

Here is what you have accomplished.
So far, you have provided really nothing. Shown that you have little to no knowledge of the topic at hand and are basic making statements that are inciting.
You have shown that your statements are ignorant in nature and are uneducated.

So......



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:25 PM
link   
reply to post by macman
 


if you go only by the wording in the 2nd amendment with NO interpretation....then anyone in a militia can own a gun

end of storry



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by rickm
 

*Sigh*
www.guncite.com...

And as per law, it was created as such that we are all in the Militia.


Title 10 USC 311. Militia composition and classes. All able-bodied Americans from 17 to 45 years of age are members of the Militia. American women who are members of the national guard are members of the Militia. Former members of the U.S.Army, navy, air force and Marine corps are members of the Militia until 64 years of age. (described in 32-313). The national guard and naval militia are called the organized Militia. The unorganized militia is everyone in the militia who is not in the national guard or the naval militia.


So please, before you open your mouth again, go learn something first.



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 03:43 PM
link   

macman
reply to post by rickm
 

*Sigh*
www.guncite.com...

And as per law, it was created as such that we are all in the Militia.


Title 10 USC 311. Militia composition and classes. All able-bodied Americans from 17 to 45 years of age are members of the Militia. American women who are members of the national guard are members of the Militia. Former members of the U.S.Army, navy, air force and Marine corps are members of the Militia until 64 years of age. (described in 32-313). The national guard and naval militia are called the organized Militia. The unorganized militia is everyone in the militia who is not in the national guard or the naval militia.


So please, before you open your mouth again, go learn something first.


Well said, Mac. So many people do not understand that salient fact. Also, going by the exact wording of the second, it does not say "only in the militia" but "because we need a militia." Two radically different clauses.



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:03 PM
link   
reply to post by macman
 


and you have shown you can quote the 2nd amendment...but think it's ok to limit felons and mentally disabled from having guns

so either you think gun limitations are ok or they aren't

which is it?



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:06 PM
link   
There should be no "limits" on who should have a firearm.

Limits are artificial impositions determined by an ever changing police-state.

What SHOULD change are the penalties for using a firearm in commission of a crime. It should be an automatic death penalty.



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:08 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


so then felons, mentally unbalanced and 8 year olds should be able to legally own any firearm?

neat



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:11 PM
link   

rickm
reply to post by beezzer
 


so then felons, mentally unbalanced and 8 year olds should be able to legally own any firearm?

neat


Hyperbole.

Neat.

Since you feel that only criminals should have weapons anyways, I'd think you'd be behind this!

Why do you want only criminals to have weapons?

Are you a criminal?

Why do you want innocent children to die?

Why do you hate so much?



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:14 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


show me where i said anything about only criminals should have guns. i dare you.


but here is what you said.

There should be no "limits" on who should have a firearm.

that means you are for felons, mentally disabled and children having guns. you said no limits. that means none.
not hyperbole. just the facts



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:23 PM
link   

rickm
reply to post by beezzer
 


show me where i said anything about only criminals should have guns. i dare you.


but here is what you said.

There should be no "limits" on who should have a firearm.

that means you are for felons, mentally disabled and children having guns. you said no limits. that means none.
not hyperbole. just the facts


You are for gun control.

Ergo; only criminals will have guns. So you want criminals to have guns and law-abiding citizens to have none.

Why do you want to harm innocent people?



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


no, i am for making sure the wrong people don't get guns

unlike you who want zero checks and balances.

you already said there should be no limitations on guns

you are the one for violent felons and child murderers getting guns.

i wonder why you want that?



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by hounddoghowlie
 


If we control our government we won't need gun control.
And that's an original.



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:32 PM
link   

rickm
reply to post by beezzer
 


no, i am for making sure the wrong people don't get guns


Nice. So who gets to determine who is "wrong"?


unlike you who want zero checks and balances.


An epic fail on your part and an indictment on your reading comprehension. I said laws need to be changed so that anyone who uses a firearm in the commission of a crime gets the death penalty.


you already said there should be no limitations on guns


Yep.


you are the one for violent felons and child murderers getting guns.

i wonder why you want that?



How many child murderers are roaming free? Hyperbole, again. You want limits on law-abiding citizens to own firearms. You could care less about criminals having guns.

Why do you want criminals to have guns and law-abiding people disarmed?



posted on Dec, 2 2013 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by rickm
 


Oh, about the kids owning weapons?

My 7 year old son got a Savage bolt-action .22 for his birthday.




top topics



 
17
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join