It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
awake1234
Pain is inevitable. Suffering is optional.
Do we see the distinction - pain is a matter of physicality; suffering is a matter of mentality.
The abandoning — in which you refrain from unskillful thoughts, words, and deeds inspired by craving — is obviously an antidote to clinging. The developing, though, plays a more paradoxical role, for you have to hold to the skillful qualities of mindfulness, concentration, and discernment that foster awareness until they're fully mature. Only then can you let them go. It's like climbing a ladder to get on a roof: you grab hold of a higher rung so that you can let go of a lower rung, and then grab onto a rung still higher. As the rungs get further off the ground, your view gets more expansive and you can see precisely where the mind's clingings are. You get a sharper sense of which parts of experience belong to which noble truth and what should be done with them: the parts that are suffering should be comprehended; the parts that cause suffering should be abandoned; the parts that form the path to the end of suffering should be further developed; and the parts that belong to the end of suffering should be verified. This helps you get higher and higher on the ladder until you find yourself securely on the roof. That's when you can finally let go of the ladder and be totally free.
So the real question we face is not God's question, passing judgment on how skillfully he created life or the world. It's our question: how skillfully are we handling the raw stuff of life? Are we clinging in ways that serve only to continue the round of suffering, or are we learning to hold to the ladder-like qualities that will eliminate craving and ignorance so that we can grow up and not have to cling. If we negotiate life armed with all four noble truths, realizing that life contains both suffering and an end to suffering, there's hope: hope that we'll be able to sort out which parts of life belong to which truth; hope that someday, in this life, we'll discover the brightness at the point where we can agree with the Buddha, "Oh. Yes. This is the end of suffering and stress."
Stop ignoring truth. Deny ignorance. Look into your heart. Follow your nature.
First, educate yourself on why you are both an Angel and a Child of God on the Earth.
claud9
I agree, to an extent. I'm no type of religious, my question is, don't we or shouldn't we know or feel what's right from wrong from our subconscious? I mean, a "sin" is what we feel guilty of right? So what exactly is a "sin"? Something a book said it was to make us feel guilty thus mongering fear and allowing us to believe (at least not me) that we're gonna burn for eternity and blah blah? We all have our own beliefs and I was open enough to read your bible passages, but the whole "throwing this into the fire" thing? Not buying it. I believe we all have the ability to create our own paths as our days go, focusing on now, not the next hour or the past, but now. I agree that love conquers all, but once again, why should a book try and make people think that almost 90 percent of things they do are a "sin" and will send them to "hell" ?
WarminIndy
reply to post by EnochWasRight
May I ask a stupid question here?
When Prince Guatama supposedly reached Enlightenment, why is it he called first on Guanyin, the mother goddess of mercy and compassion?
He said a lot of nice things along the way, but then why did he call on a goddess for mercy?
Was it to end his suffering, do you suppose? Was it to end the suffering of others? Because he called out to the goddess of mercy kind of negates everything he said before that moment, because in the end, he desired mercy. He could not escape suffering just by thinking that way. He didn't call out "Dharma" or that big word you used, he called out for mercy from a goddess.
He can't have it two ways, he can't say there is only the path to enlightenment, and then say there are gods, goddesses and a God, which in his day was called Shang Di, which the Chinese today still call Almighty God.
And he can't say that that your suffering is eased by your thoughts, and then call on an end of suffering from a goddess. So then he could not have achieved enlightenment if at the point of his enlightenment, recognized there was something greater than his own thoughts.
WarminIndy
reply to post by EnochWasRight
May I ask a stupid question here?
When Prince Guatama supposedly reached Enlightenment, why is it he called first on Guanyin, the mother goddess of mercy and compassion?
He said a lot of nice things along the way, but then why did he call on a goddess for mercy?
Was it to end his suffering, do you suppose? Was it to end the suffering of others? Because he called out to the goddess of mercy kind of negates everything he said before that moment, because in the end, he desired mercy. He could not escape suffering just by thinking that way. He didn't call out "Dharma" or that big word you used, he called out for mercy from a goddess.
He can't have it two ways, he can't say there is only the path to enlightenment, and then say there are gods, goddesses and a God, which in his day was called Shang Di, which the Chinese today still call Almighty God.
And he can't say that that your suffering is eased by your thoughts, and then call on an end of suffering from a goddess. So then he could not have achieved enlightenment if at the point of his enlightenment, recognized there was something greater than his own thoughts.
EnochWasRight
WarminIndy
reply to post by EnochWasRight
May I ask a stupid question here?
When Prince Guatama supposedly reached Enlightenment, why is it he called first on Guanyin, the mother goddess of mercy and compassion?
He said a lot of nice things along the way, but then why did he call on a goddess for mercy?
Was it to end his suffering, do you suppose? Was it to end the suffering of others? Because he called out to the goddess of mercy kind of negates everything he said before that moment, because in the end, he desired mercy. He could not escape suffering just by thinking that way. He didn't call out "Dharma" or that big word you used, he called out for mercy from a goddess.
He can't have it two ways, he can't say there is only the path to enlightenment, and then say there are gods, goddesses and a God, which in his day was called Shang Di, which the Chinese today still call Almighty God.
And he can't say that that your suffering is eased by your thoughts, and then call on an end of suffering from a goddess. So then he could not have achieved enlightenment if at the point of his enlightenment, recognized there was something greater than his own thoughts.
Suffering is the point. His platform was that suffering could be eliminated. He was incorrect. Life comes from the suffering we do for others. This is the point of Christ showing us true life.
Here is an example. Smoke and you suffer lost vitality. Why? Taking a reward ends in suffering. Flip this to the other direction. Go to a Gym and suffer exercise. What happens when you do? Suffering brings reward. Suffering is unavoidable. Only the suffering you do on purpose brings reward and life. Some of the most handicapped people in the world are the hardest workers, living full and fruitful lives. Some of the most capable people in the world end up with cardboard signs on the side of the road, begging for survival. What is the difference? Take from life and there is imbalance. Give and you reap reward. This is not the Way, it is the Life. Buddha had it wrong.
Why did he call on the Mother? Who knows. Maybe he knew the details of the Aleph Mem. We may never know. We do, however, know the Father, Son and Mother today.
WarminIndy
reply to post by akushla99
See, I asked a stupid question, and the answer was "I don't know why"....
But at least you responded with a question to my question, and I will give a response to your question.
When Jesus hung on the cross, it was in His full humanity. He had passed the cup with His disciples and since He asked His father to let the cup of what He was about to do, be passed, but then said "Nevertheless, not my will, but THY will be done".
The second cup was not passed, the cup of trembling, the cup of shame. It was His fulness of humanity crying out. Why has God forsaken humanity? But then His very last words were, "It is finished", the separation of God and man and all that had come before, the laws, the rituals, everything, and the plan to bring man back to God, all of that, was now finished because it was done. His work was done, finished, the work of His humanity. He was crying out as a man at that moment.
God did turn away, because God is a holy God. If God had not kept to His plan, since before the beginning of time, then judgment against the world would have come if God had to keep looking. Jesus hung on the cross, bearing the sin of all of humanity. He took that punishment for humanity, and could only do it as a human.
At the moment He died, there was a storm and an earthquake. There was also the same event for Elijah, and that is why those people said He called out to Elias (Elijah), because they knew already what happened to Elijah. But then the veil of the temple was torn apart, no more would man need a priest to go before God, man do it himself individually. That was the middle wall of partition, broken down, as Paul said, and Jesus entered into the temple to take the place of the High Priest, and no more would another sacrifice ever be needed, it was finished.
The natural had just met the spiritual. And it could only happen by the one who had both the human nature and the divine nature.
That's why God had forsaken, because He had to accept the sacrifice. God hadn't forsaken Jesus, He had forsaken the sin of humanity. Which is what Jesus was crying, in the place of humanity. Humanity had cried out, why has God forsaken us. But when that partition was broken, you and I could now come before God on our own.
That veil of the temple was the natural, but it had to also break the wall of partition of our hearts, that in us that separates us from God. It is finished, humanity can now come to God.
WarminIndy
reply to post by akushla99
I know I'm not stupid, I was just positing a stupid question, because it might be to some people.
But some people just poo poo any question because they don't really have a clear answer. Some people can't be bothered with any question.