It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
budski
adjensen
reply to post by budski
If you read back, I expressed the hope that some of the excellent researchers on this site would help validate independently the information we get.
What you don't seem to understand is that there is nothing that anyone can do to prove or disprove something when there is absolutely no evidence to examine. You have one woman, who is clearly disturbed, making all sorts of outrageous claims, and that's it. If I find you a video of someone raving about meeting Hitler last week at the grocery, do I need to find evidence that Hitler is dead before you'll dismiss that person's claims as nonsense?
Yes there is.
Collect enough factual evidence, and make a compelling case one way or another.
All the evidence so far points to a fake, if you take the information from his website alone, it's not very plausible.
Further research of the people involved may give an indication as to their motives.
Two alleged eyewitnesses, but no other evidence doesn't make Annett right, but nor does it make him wrong.
The amount of blogs from people who have never blogged before or after is pretty suspicious.
Everything so far is circumstantial, for both sides.
Anyway, I'm off to do some work.
If anyone DOES want to help research this and is familiar with TOR based searches, let me know, and we'll take it from there.
Love the diagnosis by the way - where did you do your psychiatric training?edit on 1/11/2013 by budski because: (no reason given)
NavyDoc
Double tapedit on 1-11-2013 by NavyDoc because: (no reason given)
budski
NavyDoc
Double tapedit on 1-11-2013 by NavyDoc because: (no reason given)
I just had to come back and check that I'd actually seen this earlier.
What a very, very silly thing to post.
Tells me all I need to know.
For those that don't know, a "Double Tap" is a military term for 2 shots fired in quick succession.
It usually refers to two head shots, fired in around half a second.
A very peculiar and silly thing to post indeed, almost like a veiled threat.
15. Double Tap
verb; the act of sending two questions via text message or email in an act of anxiety in a short interval of time; typically when trying to get someone's information, especially when awkwardly trying to meet up with someone.
Maxmars
reply to post by NavyDoc
Perhaps the conversation is better served not talking 'to' each other, but instead 'to' the topic.
No disrespect intended.
Just a friendly suggestion to get to the bottom of the weight these allegations may or may not deserve.
TKDRL
reply to post by adjensen
That greg guy seems like a rightwing nutjob to me, after browsing around and listening to his TV appearances and reading his articles.
He claimed on august 30 that he was bringing it to the RCMP, if he is not a liar and did so, what happened? Did the RCMP think his claim of fraud held no water?
On May 8, 2013 in Holland, Kevin Annett interviewed Toos Nijenhuis, a psychotherapist who was the victim of ritualized torture similar to the kind Hill explained in “Twenty-Two Faces.” Ms. Nijenhuis discussed her victimization in an international trafficking network involving prominent politicians and Catholic Cardinals during the 1960′s, including her knowledge of a child sacrificial ceremony that took place in rural Holland in 2010 (Source)
The agreement came after a new eyewitness confirmed the involvement of Ratzinger in a ritual child sacrifice in Holland in August of 1987.
“I saw Joseph Ratzinger murder a little girl at a French chateau in the fall of 1987″ stated the witness, who was a regular participant in the cult ritual torture and killing of children. (Source)
SomeOneWicked
Thank you for posting this, OP!
The idea that the Papacy, and the Vatican itself is linked to Satanism and other forms of occultism is nothing new at all. Much of this cavorts under the "guise" of organized religion.
And with regards to the source, and the Wikipedia page about it, well I take this a huge dose of skepticism. Wikipedia is a publicly moderated and information funded source. It could very well be someone who has a beef against the author of the site who authored this piece.
IMHO, Wikipedia is to be lightly chewed, not digested.
And on the other hand, the author and intent of the original article is slightly suspect as well. However, I simply observe the information and retain it. Reading this article that the OP posted doesn't surprise me one bit. It is yet another log on the fire. But I'm not quite ready to throw a lit match just yet.
NavyDoc
Maxmars
reply to post by NavyDoc
Perhaps the conversation is better served not talking 'to' each other, but instead 'to' the topic.
No disrespect intended.
Just a friendly suggestion to get to the bottom of the weight these allegations may or may not deserve.
Well, the difficulty is, that we have had multiple threads on what is, in essence, a Weekly World News headline about batboy. The only source has obvious credibility issues and there is no other evidence...at all. Its like seeking the bottom of an "Elvis had my baby" headline and it seems to me that the only reason anyone would give credence to it at this point is because it bolsters preconceived notions in certain individuals and had the subject been anyone else it would have been dismissed without a second thought.
It really deserves to be in the Hoax bin unless something really, really credible comes up.
budski
adjensen
DrunkYogi
Have you any proof that Annett is conman or fraudster? Please post.
I would consider forgery to be fraud.
Kevin Annett Doesn’t Only Steal Survivor’s Stories (He steals their signatures too…)
I don't see any proof - I see a hit piece based on nothing in particular except one persons opinion.
of the matter.
Aloysius the Gaul
budski
adjensen
DrunkYogi
Have you any proof that Annett is conman or fraudster? Please post.
I would consider forgery to be fraud.
Kevin Annett Doesn’t Only Steal Survivor’s Stories (He steals their signatures too…)
I don't see any proof - I see a hit piece based on nothing in particular except one persons opinion.
of the matter.
It has more evidence attached to it than Annett's bogus attention seeking, and you have no bother with that?? Why the double standard?!
Aloysius the Gaul
budski
adjensen
DrunkYogi
Have you any proof that Annett is conman or fraudster? Please post.
I would consider forgery to be fraud.
Kevin Annett Doesn’t Only Steal Survivor’s Stories (He steals their signatures too…)
I don't see any proof - I see a hit piece based on nothing in particular except one persons opinion.
of the matter.
It has more evidence attached to it than Annett's bogus attention seeking, and you have no bother with that?? Why the double standard?!