It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Air traffic control tower?
reply to post by StarnatalSandia
I would LOVE to see your clips!
I dont know the answer to the light colors but I'll ask for ya. I'll try to look closer in an editor in the mean time. The video that was linked from another thread looks very similar to this one, but there are colors involved. This one, from what i see, appears to be just white but I didn't look very closely or took notice of any color changes. Since you brought it up, though, I'll look much deeper and ask since he'll have noticed much easier than the video will show.
I dont think there was any sensation or feeling differently with the encounter, no loss time or anything like that. Still, I'll ask just to make sure, in case there was something, anything.
Thanks for the interest and input! I'll let ya know as soon as I find out.
reply to post by StarnatalSandia
You have zoomed in so much there is nothing to see....what you are seeing in the video are artifacts caused by zooming in so much..what you see on the video is not what you saw with your own eyes.
It could be a balloon, a plane, a planet, a plastic bag in the wind, a helicopter, bug...it could quite literally be anything. Lights in the sky do not equate alien lifeforms visiting us, they are always mundane things like listed above.
EDIT: I see you have about 15 versions of the same video, after watching the original, unedited version im pretty certain that what you have filmed are balloons.. "balloons dont hover like that"....they hover in all kinds of ways given the direction and speed of the wind.
The phrase "balloons dont hover like that" imply that is what your first thought was, otherwise why didnt you say "helicopters dont hover like that".
I have seen enough videos of balloons to say with certainty, they are indeed balloons that you filmed.edit on 4-11-2013 by AmberLeaf because: (no reason given)
I'll go with the details once again, then I'm done with all of this.
Look guys. I'm only here trying to present something as it took place. Instead of the help we were looking for, I'm met with 'HOAX! - It's not what you say - and such kinds of sillyness'. If I knew it would have been this negative by simply presenting something to a place where I THOUGHT there would be interest and some kind of help, (with a few praised exceptions... for you guys.. I REALLY appreciate it. Thank you for the interest and the hard work on trying to finger this oddity. You guys are what I really expected) I would not have bothered with the post or this site. Instead of getting at the bread and butter of the topic, I was met with everything else, responders trying to argue the facts of the person that took the original video.
Plainly put, you either have to trust the information I'm giving you or you dont. If you dont, please move on. You've made up your mind, there is nothing more to see for you. There is no use badgering because you think it's fake, or you think that the facts presented are wrong when you CAN NOT KNOW any way or the other, other than at least giving an ATS member the benifit of a doubt and a chance to be honest. If there was something there that you could disprove, then by all means, do it. But in this case, the person that gave up this information (and we wonder why such people who DO have this kinds of information and evidence tends to hide it and keep it to themselves) was not trying to misslead and gave up the information based on his experiance as a weathered sailor who has been on the waters all of his life. This I know beyond a doubt to be 100% true.
So, I say again. The witness said that the object was about a mile out, so I trust it to be true. He says it was above water, I trust it to be true. Every single detail given by him on the OP, I trust to be true. Why? Because I know the person extreemly well and I know his information to be trusted if he says so, based on his experiance.
I understand you dont know him and cant always go off of what people say, but unless you have anything else, there is nothing wrong with making a response BASED off of the information given. I know it's limited, but hey... it's all that we have. Why is that so hard to do? Why all of the nonsense about fakery, hoax and wether or not the object was above water? If he says it was above water, who would know more than he? He can see what the camera could not. There is no fame or fortune to be made here. We just wanted some honest feedback to at most identify it. Instead, we were met with everything I didn't expect.
For those that remained on topic without the bickering, naysaying and roadblocking, and offered their thoughts and even their time in research, we thank you!