There's something else here I want to address.
Originally posted by AnonymousUserVII
Homosexuality was most definitely a known concept in biblical times. It occured in ancient Rome, and it occured in Sodom and Gommorah.
Ancient Romans tended to look at sexuality as being dominant and submissive, not heterosexual and homosexual. They were more concerned about keeping
the sex within their social strata then if it was with a man or a woman.
The sexual acts that people generally associate with homosexuality did exist at this time, but not our concept of it. These sexual acts aren't
exclusive to homosexuals.
Originally posted by AnonymousUserVII
That is where we get the term refering to homosexuals, "Sodomite" from.
In the Bible, Sodomite is only ever used to describe people who were like the people who lived in Sodom. But I'll check with
Merriam Webster and see what they say.
Main Entry: sod·om·ite
Pronunciation: -"mIt
Function: noun
: one who practices sodomy
So I follow the link to
sodomy, and this is the result:
Main Entry: sod·omy
Pronunciation: 'sä-d&-mE
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French sodomie, from Late Latin Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city in Gen
19:1-11
1 : copulation with a member of the same sex or with an animal
2 : noncoital and especially anal or oral copulation with a member of the opposite sex
Nowhere in Genesis 19:1-11 do I see any mention of homosexuality. What I do see is a bunch of people trying to force their way into Lot's house to
rape his guests. Not very nice but I see no actual mention of homosexuality as a sexual preference. Or bestiality for that matter.
In Biblical times all anal and oral sex was considered against the word of God, it didn't matter who did what to whom, or what bits and pieces they
had. It was a waste of the 'seed of life', sperm.
I guess I'll go with the Bible version.
edited to be a little clearer
[edit on 29-8-2005 by Duzey]
[edit on 30-8-2005 by Duzey]