It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SuperFrog
Never mind reference to your quote.... another Jehovah witness propaganda article... very questionable at its best....
www.jw.org...
No. It's a logical question. If, because we can't understand biological processes, we claim "God" must'v done it, then the logical question is "Who created God".
And retro generations to infinity which is what you suggest,
are even more impossible then a proposed impossibility of God
Maybe someday we will all reach your unrivaled level of understanding.
So for me, for us, tsting Darwin and looking for the next layer of our understanding in the process of life isn't about proving or disproving God, it's about a better understanding of the processes of how life and organisms work on the genetic level.
AfterInfinity
reply to post by ketsuko
So for me, for us, tsting Darwin and looking for the next layer of our understanding in the process of life isn't about proving or disproving God, it's about a better understanding of the processes of how life and organisms work on the genetic level.
What about people who are not looking for the answer, but their answer? They don't want to be educated, they want to be confirmed.
It's also possible to suppose that there are more than one god, some older than others.
ketsuko
Just because I believe He is ultimately responsible for it only tells me why it is. It doesn't tell me how, and that's what I'm in the lab to find out. I want to know how God did it.
What about people who are not looking for the answer, but their answer? They don't want to be educated, they want to be confirmed.
So in essence you want to become God. Scientifically, finding out how involves producing replicable results. You want to obtain and replicate God's ability, thus becoming a "God" yourself.
There's the clash. A fundamental tenet of religions is that one must have faith (belief without proof/knowledge). The moment one has verifiable proof "faith" ceases to exist...
grey580
Evolution and Creation don't have to be at odds.
Just because Evolution hasn't found evidence that we were engineered doesn't mean that we weren't.
And of course everyone knows. It was Aliens.
edit on 29-10-2013 by grey580 because: (no reason given)