It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It seems the stunt of President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry has met with stiff opposition, and not just from the American Public. A list that was reported by the Mainstream Media as only 47 Senators signing a letter against the UN Arms Treaty, seems to be more like 50 and the list is growing. Meanwhile the Senate’s Open Letter to President Obama on the UN treaty he signed after they voted against it is going viral.
Fifty-one US Senators voted against allowing President Obama to sign a treaty and attempting to under mind the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. Legislation was already completed. Instead, President Obama sent John Kerry to the UN to sign the treaty anyway. The Senate was not happy. People like Senator James Inhoffe (R-OK, head of the Senate Arms Committee) vowed to take stand after stand to get rid of this thing.
Dear President Obama:
We write to express our concern and regret at your decision to sign the United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty. For the following reasons, we cannot give our advice and consent to this treaty:
First, the treaty was adopted by a procedure which violates a red line laid down by your own administration. In October 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the U.S. supported the negotiation of the treaty only by “the rule of consensus decision-making.” But in April 2013, after the treaty failed to achieve consensus, it was adopted by majority vote in the U.N. General Assembly. We fear that this reversal has done grave damage to the diplomatic credibility of the United States.
[Reasons 2..3..4..5..6.. etc...]
We urge you to notify the treaty depository that the U.S. does not intend to ratify the Arms Trade Treaty, and is therefore not bound by its obligations. As members of the Senate, we pledge to oppose the ratification of this treaty, and we give notice that we do not regard the U.S. as bound to uphold its object and purpose.
TextWe urge you to notify the treaty depository that the U.S. does not intend to ratify the Arms Trade Treaty, and is therefore not bound by its obligations. As members of the Senate, we pledge to oppose the ratification of this treaty, and we give notice that we do not regard the U.S. as bound to uphold its object and purpose.
“Today the People’s House takes a stand for national sovereignty where the White House failed to do so. The ATT is a clear threat to the Constitutional rights of all Americans and should never have been signed. This letter makes it absolutely clear to President Obama and his cabinet that the United States Congress will not support any implementing legislation to give this dangerous treaty the legs it needs to take effect. We will also oppose any efforts by this administration or future ones to implement or enforce this treaty through executive action. The liberty of the American people and the independence of the United States are far too sacred to ever be sacrificed at the altar of a dysfunctional global institution like the United Nations. For the sake of our freedom at home and our strength abroad, this fight must continue.”
The good news for gun owners is that a ratifying resolution of the ATT would require two-thirds support in the Senate. With 50 Senators on record in opposition to the treaty, such a super majority is not possible at this time.
Yet diligence is required, because a shift in the makeup of the Senate could open the door to future ratification.
Cabin
reply to post by elouina
They are not fighting for your rights, but the rights of gun companies.
This treaty is not about local trade, but sets high regulations on international trade. This would affect the profits of US gun companies, as US is the largest exporter of firearms in the world.
Cabin
They are not fighting for your rights, but the rights of gun companies.
buster2010
everyone knows how the GOP wets its pants when someone wants to hold companies accountable for their actions.
FlyersFan
Cabin
They are not fighting for your rights, but the rights of gun companies.
That IS fighting for our rights. We have a right to buy the product that the gun companies put out. We have a right to self defense. We have a right to bear arms. We have a right to go target shooting or gun collecting. The U.N. has NO RIGHT to interfere with our rights as Americans. And Obama has NO RIGHT to give our rights away.
Oh ... and gun companies have rights too. They have a right to be in business. They have a right to supply us with our fire arms. They have a right to make products that we want ... products that offer us self protection. They have a right to make a profit as well.
buster2010
everyone knows how the GOP wets its pants when someone wants to hold companies accountable for their actions.
Gun manufacturing companies don't shoot innocent people.
They aren't 'accountable' for the insanity of a few shooters.
Crazy people go steal guns and do the shooting up ....or inner city gang banger types ...
Gun companies responsibly provide a product that MILLIONS of Americans want/need.
It boggles my mind that my elders in high government positions today arent all throwing up arms in protest
FlyersFan
That IS fighting for our rights. We have a right to buy the product that the gun companies put out. We have a right to self defense. We have a right to bear arms. We have a right to go target shooting or gun collecting. The U.N. has NO RIGHT to interfere with our rights as Americans. And Obama has NO RIGHT to give our rights away.
Oh ... and gun companies have rights too. They have a right to be in business. They have a right to supply us with our fire arms. They have a right to make products that we want ... products that offer us self protection. They have a right to make a profit as well.
buster2010
FlyersFan
Cabin
They are not fighting for your rights, but the rights of gun companies.
That IS fighting for our rights. We have a right to buy the product that the gun companies put out. We have a right to self defense. We have a right to bear arms. We have a right to go target shooting or gun collecting. The U.N. has NO RIGHT to interfere with our rights as Americans. And Obama has NO RIGHT to give our rights away.
Oh ... and gun companies have rights too. They have a right to be in business. They have a right to supply us with our fire arms. They have a right to make products that we want ... products that offer us self protection. They have a right to make a profit as well.
buster2010
everyone knows how the GOP wets its pants when someone wants to hold companies accountable for their actions.
Gun manufacturing companies don't shoot innocent people.
They aren't 'accountable' for the insanity of a few shooters.
Crazy people go steal guns and do the shooting up ....or inner city gang banger types ...
Gun companies responsibly provide a product that MILLIONS of Americans want/need.
This treaty will change NO LAWS here in the states this is only for international sales by companies. And companies are not people you can buy and sell companies unless you want to bring back slavery you can't do that with people.
benrl
buster2010
FlyersFan
Cabin
They are not fighting for your rights, but the rights of gun companies.
That IS fighting for our rights. We have a right to buy the product that the gun companies put out. We have a right to self defense. We have a right to bear arms. We have a right to go target shooting or gun collecting. The U.N. has NO RIGHT to interfere with our rights as Americans. And Obama has NO RIGHT to give our rights away.
Oh ... and gun companies have rights too. They have a right to be in business. They have a right to supply us with our fire arms. They have a right to make products that we want ... products that offer us self protection. They have a right to make a profit as well.
buster2010
everyone knows how the GOP wets its pants when someone wants to hold companies accountable for their actions.
Gun manufacturing companies don't shoot innocent people.
They aren't 'accountable' for the insanity of a few shooters.
Crazy people go steal guns and do the shooting up ....or inner city gang banger types ...
Gun companies responsibly provide a product that MILLIONS of Americans want/need.
This treaty will change NO LAWS here in the states this is only for international sales by companies. And companies are not people you can buy and sell companies unless you want to bring back slavery you can't do that with people.
A treaty is directly effecting US gun manufacturers business, If we are so concerned about treating the international community fairly and doing whats right on the international stage why don't we talk Trade tariffs.
You know something that could have a direct benefit for the us, instead of more things that go directing to our own detriment...
Its an agenda pure and simple, there are far more important imbalances with international trade than gun export.
IF the UN gave a crap about the world they would address the tariffs and policies that cause a massive imbalance in manufacturing and cause nations like the US to rape other countries via that imbalance.
Yet thats not what they are doing is it? they are focusing on guns, because just like US politics, international politics is not about helping the people, its about doing something that makes headlines.
buster2010
benrl
buster2010
FlyersFan
Cabin
They are not fighting for your rights, but the rights of gun companies.
That IS fighting for our rights. We have a right to buy the product that the gun companies put out. We have a right to self defense. We have a right to bear arms. We have a right to go target shooting or gun collecting. The U.N. has NO RIGHT to interfere with our rights as Americans. And Obama has NO RIGHT to give our rights away.
Oh ... and gun companies have rights too. They have a right to be in business. They have a right to supply us with our fire arms. They have a right to make products that we want ... products that offer us self protection. They have a right to make a profit as well.
buster2010
everyone knows how the GOP wets its pants when someone wants to hold companies accountable for their actions.
Gun manufacturing companies don't shoot innocent people.
They aren't 'accountable' for the insanity of a few shooters.
Crazy people go steal guns and do the shooting up ....or inner city gang banger types ...
Gun companies responsibly provide a product that MILLIONS of Americans want/need.
This treaty will change NO LAWS here in the states this is only for international sales by companies. And companies are not people you can buy and sell companies unless you want to bring back slavery you can't do that with people.
A treaty is directly effecting US gun manufacturers business, If we are so concerned about treating the international community fairly and doing whats right on the international stage why don't we talk Trade tariffs.
You know something that could have a direct benefit for the us, instead of more things that go directing to our own detriment...
Its an agenda pure and simple, there are far more important imbalances with international trade than gun export.
IF the UN gave a crap about the world they would address the tariffs and policies that cause a massive imbalance in manufacturing and cause nations like the US to rape other countries via that imbalance.
Yet thats not what they are doing is it? they are focusing on guns, because just like US politics, international politics is not about helping the people, its about doing something that makes headlines.
The idea behind this treaty is to track weapon sales to nations that are using those weapons to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity. If a nation isn't breaking these laws then the treaty would have no affect on the sales to those nations.
Would you want a company here in the states selling weapons to nations that are killing our people? I wouldn't and I don't care how many jobs it costs. How many people at these companies would quit their jobs if they found out who the weapons were going to?