Woman Says She Was Healed By A Ghost... and has a photo to prove it!!

reply to post by OneManArmy


Well OK but I just don't see reasons WHY it can't be a ghost in the pic. Everyone seems to just say that it's no way a ghost and it's just overexposure. OK but why?

That would mean they didn't notice a stranger sitting behind her in the empty church?!

The lack of legs is also convincing to me...

peacefulpete
reply to post by OneManArmy

 

Well OK but I just don't see reasons WHY it can't be a ghost in the pic. Everyone seems to just say that it's no way a ghost and it's just overexposure. OK but why?

That would mean they didn't notice a stranger sitting behind her in the empty church?!

The lack of legs is also convincing to me...

I zoomed into the picture, the legs are clearly there, the light glare cuts across the thighs. You can see the footwear also(brown shoes black socks). And where they should appear, right at the far end of the pew.
Im 100% certain that there is nothing paranormal about this picture.
There is nothing paranormal about sun rays.

reply to post by OneManArmy


Yeah I zoomed in too earlier and again, just now. It really looks to me like she has no legs. Looks like the lines of the floor continue past where her legs should be.

Granted this is an old photo and I understand that it might be nothing but tricks of shadow & overexposure.

Still it looks like no legs to me... Or maybe very faint transparent legs...

I'd be curious if other people think they can see her legs or not?

What's the white splot over to the pic's lower right?

Its covering up a rectangular shadow

gardener
What's the white splot over to the pic's lower right?

Its covering up a rectangular shadow

Honestly I would have just assumed it was a sunspot...?

Whatever the pic shows, it is definitely overexposed, no question.