The Indigo Children, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 19-11-2004 @ 12:40 PM by Indigo_Child
I haven't read all the posts so my apologies if I'm just repeating them.. from what I've learnt previously.. I always thought 'indigo child' reffered to prodogies etc., kids with ADD or autistics.. or more that they might be all indigo children and they have a label slapped on them because they may have behavioural difficulties.. kids who have higher intelligence get bored easily when there expected to slow down for others.. they're incredibly astute and their minds need to be stimulated.
I don't think it's the next stage in evolution though.. they've always been around.. all the master artists.. scientists etc. I'm sure leanardo di vinci would fit into this category nicely.


The "Indigo child" itself is a label, whose origin that I explained earlier on, of a certain breed of psychic children having an Indigo aura. However there is a distinct difference between gifted children and Indigo Children, though the principles are still the same. Indigo children are born with active psychic abilities and as dragonfur said, a god-centered consciousness. They feel a sense of mission in life. They are the next stage of human evolution, because these children are born with more advanced minds than others. I do not mean in the sense of high IQ's; I mean in a holistic sense.

Catcus, there are many spiritual cults and new age groups, and I am not a part of any. The Indigo children are not a cult, it's just a label for a certain type of adults and children - like the "gifted label"


reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 08:30 AM by riley
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Indigo children are born with active psychic abilities and as dragonfur said, a god-centered consciousness. They feel a sense of mission in life. They are the next stage of human evolution, because these children are born with more advanced minds than others. I do not mean in the sense of high IQ's; I mean in a holistic sense.

Accordinging to that list I'm also an indigo child.. I've had premintions and psychic stuff on and off all my life.. but I just use the term freak. I don't consider it any more 'evolved'.. just different. I doubt 'indigo children' are going to usher in some sort of golden age.. that was probably the idea when christainity first started. An 'advanced mind'.. Albert Eintein had three times the synapses than an average person.. that could have been a mutation towards a new kind of evolvement.. problem was it's been suggested he had dispraxia or apserurgs so there's good and bad with everything. People being 'spiritually enlightened' isn't new obviously.. how can it be something we're involveing into when 'indigos' have been around for thousands of years? If you are reffering to the amount of 'indigo children' that could be just natural abilities reaserting themselves after a millenia of ESP being repressed my religious organisations deeming it 'evil'.
Though I am trying to keep an open mind about this I'm getting the impression that if someone is an 'indigo child'- they must be special or blessed.. and treated or reverred as so.. I'm wondering how they'll be able to lead the rest of humanity if they baby talk the 'spitritually challenged'.. it would make people resent them and do the opposite of their 'teachings'.


reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 08:50 AM by Indigo_Child
Accordinging to that list I'm also an indigo child.. I've had premintions and psychic stuff on and off all my life.. but I just use the term freak. I don't consider it any more 'evolved'.. just different.


You are not a freak, in the same way Einstein, Mozart and other such gifted people weren't. The whole problem with your outlook here is that you are using society as a frame of reference to decide your own state of mind, and you conforming to it's standards, by using the term "freak"

You already know your abilities are real, and society thinks they are not, in other words society is sharing a delusion. Do you want the acceptance of deluded people?

If you are reffering to the amount of 'indigo children' that could be just natural abilities reaserting themselves after a millenia of ESP being repressed my religious organisations deeming it 'evil'.


Exactly, and that is what I believe too, that our spiritual and psychic abilities were advanced many millenias ago. Now, we are beginning to recover our abilities, after a millenia, and that certainly is an evolution. We've always had these powers and abilities, as you rightly said, and the new influx of Indigo children today, are bringing them back. So are we not ushering in a new age for humanity?

Though I am trying to keep an open mind about this I'm getting the impression that if someone is an 'indigo child'- they must be special or blessed.. and treated or reverred as so.. I'm wondering how they'll be able to lead the rest of humanity if they baby talk the 'spitritually challenged'.. it would make people resent them and do the opposite of their 'teachings'.


I do not think I am anymore special than you. We all have our own purpose, goals and missions in life, and mine happens to be to change the world for the better. This does not mean I, or any Indigo Child is better than you, it just means we have different goals and purposes. All souls are equal, and when I talk to you, I am talking to you as an equal


reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 09:26 AM by riley
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
You are not a freak, in the same way Einstein, Mozart and other such gifted people weren't. The whole problem with your outlook here is that you are using society as a frame of reference to decide your own state of mind, and you conforming to it's standards, by using the term "freak"

I don't mind being called 'freak'.. I don't think of it in the negative context.. it just means I'm very different.. I might be very excentric but I have qualities that make me a curiousity to the 'normals' and contrastly they seem to use me as a reference to where they fit into society.
You already know your abilities are real, and society thinks they are not, in other words society is sharing a delusion. Do you want the acceptance of deluded people?

It feels NA to me.. although the 'archtype' I am I am constantly having to buck what society expects.. it's second nature now though.
Exactly, and that is what I believe too, that our spiritual and psychic abilities were advanced many millenias ago. Now, we are beginning to recover our abilities, after a millenia, and that certainly is an evolution.

Revolution might be more accurate if we are just reawakening dorment abilities.
We've always had these powers and abilities, as you rightly said, and the new influx of Indigo children today, are bringing them back. So are we not ushering in a new age for humanity?

But wouldn't that really make all people indigo children? I think once oppressive religions are gone that will be what could usher a new age for humanity.. they'd be no distractions from the 'self'.
I do not think I am anymore special than you. We all have our own purpose, goals and missions in life, and mine happens to be to change the world for the better. This does not mean I, or any Indigo Child is better than you, it just means we have different goals and purposes. All souls are equal, and when I talk to you, I am talking to you as an equal

Likewise.


reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 10:34 AM by riley
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Yes, we are all potential Indigo Children. Remember, it's about having a state of mind, about reawakening your god-consciousness. In the new age, we all will be born with that state of consciousness, and take it for granted.


This is what I don't understand.. why 'indigo' childen exclusively? Years ago they were called 'crystal' children or 'natural witches'.. 'children of nature', 'fai', 'clairvoyant', 'secsond sight. etc. is their a difference? It's kind of sounds similar to the hippy movement [without the drugs- maybe] .. or christians aspiring to be like christ.. or buddhists trying to reach enlightenment. The philosophy is nothing new.. however the amount of 'indigos' may make a difference. All religions share this aspiring to be like deity.. [though christianity [for instance] discourages self empowerment] all I aspire to be is myself and to reach my own potential. I don't think humanity needs to embrace a 'god-conciousness' to bring about a golden age though it might be needed in such a transition.. the thing with aspiring to be an 'indigo child'.. it seems to be not that different from things like buddhism.. it's a very similar philosophy [except I don't think buddhists have a 'god' really.. I think their beliefs are dependant on knowledge not assumptions]. My point is we seem to be entering an era where the old relgions are getting traded in for the new.. which is a form of evolvement. Eventually we'll probably do away with all religions and we'll suddenly appreciate and respect our own existance.. though we will still retain our spirituality.. it will just be in a percepective thats not distructive.

[edit on 20-11-2004 by riley]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



North Carolina\'s strange, strange pond.
  Posted 2 days ago with 46 member flags
Saw my first possesion.....:O
  Posted 16 days ago with 18 member flags
The Nevada Triangle: Have You Experienced It?
  Posted 14 days ago with 18 member flags
Empaths and thier "powers" fiction or reality?
  Posted 12 days ago with 13 member flags
Ghosts At Boot Camp! Do You Have a Story?
  Posted 9 days ago with 12 member flags
Do extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof?
  Posted 7 days ago with 10 member flags
Help... I want to convince my wife that mediums are con artists
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags