It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The 72 Types of Americans That are Considered “Potential Terrorists”

page: 1
15
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 01:45 PM
link   
This author has compiled a list of 72 "Labels" that seem to be considered *Terrorist Types*

The article lists each one and links to supporting documentation.

It seems very real, as we have seen a complete 180 degree turnaround in general thinking and propaganda patterns over the last 5 or 6 years especially.

What are they trying to suggest?

Who are they trying to isolate?

Who benefits from this agenda?


This article is on an "anti-Left Wing" site


Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)?

If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents.

At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens.





each item has a link to supporting documents;
HELLO! Meet the 72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” by the Obama Administration




1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”

10. “Anti-Gay”

11. “Anti-Immigrant”

12. “Anti-Muslim”

13. “The Patriot Movement”

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15. Members of the Family Research Council

16. Members of the American Family Association

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21. Members of the Christian Action Network

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27. The militia movement

28. The sovereign citizen movement

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30. Anyone that “complains about bias”

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40. “Militia or unorganized militia”

41. “General right-wing extremist”

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians



HELLO! Meet the 72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” by the Obama Administration




posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 01:48 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 




Well FEMA said the Founding Fathers are terrorists so no big surprise



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 01:49 PM
link   
So basically everyone in the USA because Iam sure everyone will be at least one of those.
It would be funny If it was a joke but it isn't is it?



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 01:50 PM
link   
reply to post by starwarsisreal
 


Well they were
depends which side of the ponds view you take.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 01:57 PM
link   
Add to this list:

Anti-dogmatic thinking.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 01:57 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Whew! Thank goodness, I'm safe.


It's pretty clear the US government has succumbed to there innate paranoia. They really need to see a psychiatrist or something.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 02:05 PM
link   
reply to post by boymonkey74
 

You have no idea how paranoid the DHS is.

This is out of a DHS-FBI Bulletin called the Indicators of Suspicious Behaviors at Hotels



(U//FOUO) Possible indicators of terrorist behaviors at hotels: The observation of multiple indicators may represent—based on the specific facts or circumstances—possible terrorist behaviors at hotels: —
(U//FOUO) Not providing professional or personal details on hotel registrations—such as place of employment, contact information, or place of residence.
— (U//FOUO) Using payphones for outgoing calls or making front desk requests in person to avoid using the room telephone.
— (U//FOUO) Interest in using Internet cafes, despite hotel Internet availability.
— (U//FOUO) Non-VIPs who request that their presence at a hotel not be divulged.
— (U//FOUO) Extending departure dates one day at a time for prolonged periods.
— (U//FOUO) Refusal of housekeeping services for extended periods.
— (U//FOUO) Extended stays with little baggage or unpacked luggage.
— (U//FOUO) Access or attempted access to areas of the hotel normally restricted to staff.
— (U//FOUO) Use of cash for large transactions or a credit card in someone else’s name.
— (U//FOUO) Requests for specific rooms, floors, or other locations in the hotel.
— (U//FOUO) Use of a third party to register.
— (U//FOUO) Multiple visitors or deliveries to one individual or room.
— (U//FOUO) Unusual interest in hotel access, including main and alternate entrances, emergency exits, and surrounding routes.
— (U//FOUO) Use of entrances and exits that avoid the lobby or other areas with cameras and hotel personnel.
— (U//FOUO) Attempting to access restricted parking areas with a vehicle or leaving unattended vehicles near the hotel building.
— (U//FOUO) Unusual interest in hotel staff operating procedures, shift changes, closed-circuit TV systems, fire alarms, and security systems.
— (U//FOUO) Leaving the property for several days and then returning.
— (U//FOUO) Abandoning a room and leaving behind clothing, toiletries, or other items.
— (U//FOUO) Noncompliance with other hotel policies.


DHS-FBI Bulletin: Indicators of Suspicious Behaviors at Hotels

I like the one where if you leave you car next to the hotel unattended its suspicious
so just park next to you bed in you room.
edit on 27/10/2013 by skuly because: typo



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 02:07 PM
link   
So what do we name them? All I could come up with is somehow something attached themselves to their brains, virus, aliens, , 4D/5D, computer/AI, who actually lives like that on Earth?

Might as well expect some visitors soon, all of us for that matter. Power and Money leads to this way of living you can have all mine! I'm due for some time off anyway.

Wonder if I will see any back pay.




posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 02:13 PM
link   

Bassago
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Whew! Thank goodness, I'm safe.


It's pretty clear the US government has succumbed to there innate paranoia. They really need to see a psychiatrist or something.


yes, I'd advise electro convulsive therapy
administered with one of these



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 02:14 PM
link   
Funny enough, direct from the training manual (must point out that it clearly states not to be used in the field):




All nations have an ideology, something in which they believe. When a politicalideology falls outside the norms of a society, it is known as extremism. Whenextremists take their ideology to the next level and believe that it is the only rightideology to follow, it becomes supremism.2.

Ideology
– A set of political beliefs about the nature of people and society; an organized collection of ideas about the best and most appropriate way to live.3.

Extremism
– A term used to describe the actions or ideologies of individuals or groupswho take a political idea to its limits, regardless of unfortunate repercussions, and showintolerance toward all views other than their own.4.

Extremist
– A person who advocates the use of force or violence; advocates supremacistcauses based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or national origin; or otherwise engagesto illegally deprive individuals or groups of their civil rights.5.

Supremism
– The belief that a particular race, religion, gender, species, belief system, or culture is superior to others and entitles those who identify with it to dominate, control, or rule those who do not. A person who believes that a certain group is or should besupreme is a
supremacist
.


Kinda sounds like Government and the people who spend a ton of money to manipulate it, dun nit?




posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 02:21 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Oh just stop it. How many right wing, tea party, yadda yadda are currently being held for protesting or any other activism... now look up how many Communists, Anarchists, Socialists etc are being held because of their political activism.

Get a dose of reality.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 02:27 PM
link   
I was someplace many years ago and to be honest I do not even remember the topic but one of the personalities said, "The Feds have a law against everything and if they want to get you on something they can". I just filed that in my hummm file but it would appear as the years have passed he might have been Prophetically correct?

Most of the people I know in the hinterland just want to pay their taxes and appear to worship whatever the government says until election time.... so they are left alone..... Farmers know it is the chicken that sticks it's head up is the one that goes into the pot for supper.

The main thing I have witnessed is there seems to be more and more who have lost faith.. I know many in their 80s all the way down to their 20s that seem to be genuinely distrustful and disgusted... maybe all the awakening threads during 2012 were not so far off after all because there certainly has been a global awakening with the NSA stuff.... ? Fortunately (?) with the things that are on the horizon you have to wonder if the grumblings will motivate people to actually get involved....?
edit on 27-10-2013 by 727Sky because: ?



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Wouldn't it be easier to list the types of people who aren't possible terrorists?



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 04:01 PM
link   
Oh, I am sure my husband and I are on some sort of watch list. He's a former Army Ranger, we own guns, bought acreage and moved out to the country, and last but not least - are "conspiracy theorists."

What fun!



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


I seem to have to post this same post on all of these type of threads.

You know the "your government thinks your a terrorist" type of threads.

simply put, every American, everyone, every person on this planet can be considered a "potential" terrorism its just that some are a bigger potential terrorist than others.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 06:07 PM
link   
Seems to me that they need to put every member of congress, anyone that works for the obama administration, top level people in any of the alphabet agencys, and obama himself on that list and start by removing all of them from their posisition. Then we can start to run our country with some common sense the way it was meant to be.



posted on Oct, 27 2013 @ 08:40 PM
link   

skuly


(U//FOUO) Possible indicators of terrorist behaviors at hotels: The observation of multiple indicators may represent—based on the specific facts or circumstances—possible terrorist behaviors at hotels: —
(U//FOUO) Not providing professional or personal details on hotel registrations—such as place of employment, contact information, or place of residence.
— (U//FOUO) Using payphones for outgoing calls or making front desk requests in person to avoid using the room telephone.
— (U//FOUO) Interest in using Internet cafes, despite hotel Internet availability.
— (U//FOUO) Non-VIPs who request that their presence at a hotel not be divulged.
— (U//FOUO) Extending departure dates one day at a time for prolonged periods.
— (U//FOUO) Refusal of housekeeping services for extended periods.
— (U//FOUO) Extended stays with little baggage or unpacked luggage.
— (U//FOUO) Access or attempted access to areas of the hotel normally restricted to staff.
— (U//FOUO) Use of cash for large transactions or a credit card in someone else’s name.
— (U//FOUO) Requests for specific rooms, floors, or other locations in the hotel.
— (U//FOUO) Use of a third party to register.
— (U//FOUO) Multiple visitors or deliveries to one individual or room.
— (U//FOUO) Unusual interest in hotel access, including main and alternate entrances, emergency exits, and surrounding routes.
— (U//FOUO) Use of entrances and exits that avoid the lobby or other areas with cameras and hotel personnel.
— (U//FOUO) Attempting to access restricted parking areas with a vehicle or leaving unattended vehicles near the hotel building.
— (U//FOUO) Unusual interest in hotel staff operating procedures, shift changes, closed-circuit TV systems, fire alarms, and security systems.
— (U//FOUO) Leaving the property for several days and then returning.
— (U//FOUO) Abandoning a room and leaving behind clothing, toiletries, or other items.
— (U//FOUO) Noncompliance with other hotel policies.



Wow lets see how many I hit when moving to portland.

1.Realtor paid and reserved hotel for me.
2. Had dogs with us, so refused room service for days on end.
3. Had to find out where internet cafe was because their wifi wouldn't work with mac.
4. due to closing taking forever, had to keep extending the stay.
5. Paid cash out of an allotment put aside for that purpose.
6. Had no baggage as expected to be in a home and not hotel, everything in storage.

Real easy to become a terrorist it seems.



posted on Oct, 28 2013 @ 03:00 AM
link   
There are always two sides to the medal - and I can relate to the possiblity that people with high "hit-rates" on those lists are dubious and might do illegal things.

Look at that hotel-points-list - these are (on one side of the medal) behaviour patterns of people who like their freedom - but on the other side of people who don't want to leave traces.. Suspicious, right?



posted on Oct, 28 2013 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by starwarsisreal
 


Wow,

I mean I knew the sentiment. I knew the type. I knew the reality behind it....but seeing this little dork go off...it was nauseating...

Traitors fill our sacred halls and cast treacherous echos from the shadows of cowardice and guilt.


Sick. Kill em all.



posted on Oct, 28 2013 @ 12:44 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 



It seems very real, as we have seen a complete 180 degree turnaround in general thinking and propaganda patterns over the last 5 or 6 years especially.


A former government employee told me several years ago that ALL retired military, Secret Service, FBI, CIA... were on the government terrorist watch list.

What are they trying to suggest?

People in those categories will not make good "serfs" That is why they include not only Conservatives but Progressives and Anarchists. The elite want to get rid of possible leaders.
Coercive Persuasion and Attitude Change



Encyclopedia of Sociology Volume 1, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York
By Richard J. Ofshe, Ph.D.

Coercive persuasion and thought reform are alternate names for programs of social influence capable of producing substantial behavior and attitude change through the use of coercive tactics, persuasion, and/or interpersonal and group-based influence manipulations (Schein 1961; Lifton 1961). Such programs have also been labeled "brainwashing" (Hunter 1951), ...these programs are distinguishable from other elaborate attempts to influence behavior and attitudes, to socialize, and to accomplish social control. Their distinguishing features are their totalistic qualities (Lifton 1961), the types of influence procedures they employ, and the organization of these procedures into three distinctive subphases of the overall process (Schein 1961; Ofshe and Singer 1986). The key factors that distinguish coercive persuasion from other training and socialization schemes are:
The reliance on intense interpersonal and psychological attack to destabilize an individual's sense of self to promote compliance

1. The use of an organized peer group

2. Applying interpersonal pressure to promote conformity

3. The manipulation of the totality of the person's social environment to stabilize behavior once modified

Thought-reform programs have been employed in attempts to control and indoctrinate individuals, societal groups (e.g., intellectuals), and even entire populations....The individuals to whom these influence programs were applied were in some cases unwilling subjects (prisoner populations) and in other cases volunteers who sought to participate in what they believed might be a career-beneficial, educational experience (Lifton 1981, p. 248).

Significant differences existed between the social environments and the control mechanisms employed in the two types of programs initially studied. Their similarities, however, are of more importance in understanding their ability to influence behavior and beliefs than are their differences. They shared the utilization of coercive persuasion's key effective-influence mechanisms: a focused attack on the stability of a person's sense of self; reliance on peer group interaction; the development of interpersonal bonds between targets and their controllers and peers; and an ability to control communication among participants... Schein noted that even for prisoners, what happened was a subjection to "unusually intense and prolonged persuasion" that they could not avoid; thus, "they were coerced into allowing themselves to be persuaded" (Schein 1961, p. 18)....


Who are they trying to isolate?
LEADERS of any and all stripes.

Who benefits from this agenda?
The Elite.

Pascal Lamy was the director-general of the World Trade Organization.
The following article was adapted from Pascal Lamy’s speech, “Whither Globalization,” presented at the Council for the United States and Italy conference in Venice, on June 4, 2011.


Climate change negotiations are not just about the global environment but global economics as well — the way that technology, costs and growth are to be distributed and shared..

Can we do that without questioning radically the Western way of life?..

The reality is that, so far, we have largely failed to articulate a clear and compelling vision of why a new global order matters ...Half a century ago, those who designed the post-war system — the United Nations, the Bretton Woods system, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) — were deeply influenced by the shared lessons of history.

All had lived through the chaos of the 1930s — when turning inwards led to economic depression, nationalism and war. All, including the defeated powers, agreed that the road to peace lay with building a new international order — and an approach to international relations that questioned the Westphalian, sacrosanct principle of sovereignty...



...In America, the protection of property rights is placed alongside life and liberty.

Yet, there is a worldwide view shared by many of our leaders who see private property ownership as selfish and destructive to the "common good." They believe that property is a big piece of the "pie" that needs to be redistributed.

Why should this be important to you? Slaves in countries all over the world were kept from owning property in an effort to control them.
The answer to this nationwide threat is to be informed of the end goals of "fundamental changes" for America.

The United Nations (U.N.) 1976 Vancouver Declaration stated, "Land ... cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore (it) contributes to social injustice."

The U.N. Resolution for Sustainable Development (Agenda 21) was accepted worldwide in 1992.
Consider the following facts.

-- In 1992, President George H.W. Bush signed the document and pledged to adopt the goals of Agenda 21.
-- In 1993, President Clinton signed Executive Order 12852 to create the President's Council on Sustainable Development (Agenda 21).

-- The result is that Agenda 21 is now emerging as government policy across our nation.

-- The U.N.'s chief mechanism for advancing the plan through local governments is a group called ICLEI -- formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives. Harvey Ruvin, vice chairman, ICLEI, said, "Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective." articles.petoskeynews.com...


Also see:
From Carroll Quigley to the UN Millennium Summit: Thoughts on the New World Order

THE POST SUSTAINABLE FUTURE

Your government is a corporatocracy, a new authoritarian state in the process of consolidating your output into a more controllable, exploitable channel. The reason you are being misled by your government and told that all of this is good for you, is because there is no profit in managing a mass uprising. It is too disruptive. The markets want you to continue to consume---quietly and obediently...




top topics



 
15
<<   2 >>

log in

join