posted on Oct, 26 2013 @ 11:03 AM
Hi, this is my first post, I am the very open-minded and I hope this post will be useful to you all.
Dear ATS members,
“You can’t reach truth if you don’t dare to adventure yourself outside your mind-bubble”
Most of the discussion in Above Top Secret aren't constructive at all, and it is the only thing causing hate and unstoppable debates that reach no
conclusion. Why? Simple, many see black or white.
*Before continuing, I would like to mention that you should not see this post as an attack to anyone’s ideas. It is to make you understand how all
together (really everyone), we can reach a better understanding and the truth. If you feel offended in any way, calm down and try to read through.
So, what do I mean by black or white?
Most of the people in the world have their own ideas and know that there are opposite ones, for example: Creation vs. Evolution, good vs. bad,
Electric Universe Theory vs. the Current Universe Theory, etc.
And, why wouldn't debates/discussions be constructive?
In one word, it is because of “criticism”. When someone posts a criticism, it means he refuted someone’s idea in advance (consciously or not).
Reasons? They protect their own ideas; they don’t like the new idea; they can’t imagine how it could be true; they don’t understand it. Results?
The one who criticize rejects any new concepts, while the one who is criticized gets offended or questions (even rejects) his own idea.
What is the most illogical critic?
How many times have you heard someone saying “Where are the facts/images/proofs?” Ironically, that is often a stupid question because, when it is
matter of a very rare/secret/hidden subject, there is a 0% chance of facts/images/proofs. In such case, the evidence is the logic, explanation and
consequences behind it. For example, do you really think I can show you a picture of an alien to prove my point? No only it is extremely unlikely, but
it would probably be so unbelievable that everyone would say it is fake. So, if I have it or not, there would be no difference. On the other hand, it
is extremely logical that, it there is life on a big space rock (Earth) around one of the many stars, there is 100% chance of life somewhere else in
Instead of criticizing, dare to make the effort of understanding how the other person got to such conclusion and what such conclusion would imply.
Talking, sharing ideas, linking concepts, and even think together why your own and the other’s idea differs. All this will allow you not only to
find common grounds on which to build a better understanding, but also joining ideas will open the way to new ones that are more logical and
I show it to you with one well-known topic: The theory of the Universe.
---- The Electric Universe (EU) vs. the Current Theory (CT) ---
The CT has been able to explain a lot of stuff, from small to unimaginably big structures, but it hasn't been able to explain some other so called
"anomalies" (increasing number with new discoveries). On the other side, EU has been able to predict and explain a lot of the phenomena not fitting
in CT, but it has many flaws on phenomena easily explained by CT. And everyone argues which one is the real one… Well, let me tell you that after a
lot of research, it is BOTH. Just look at the facts. CT is based mainly on gravity, while EU mainly of electric energy. Spoiler alert, both gravity
and electric energy coexist in the same universe. Focusing on only one of the components will result into a miss understanding of the phenomena caused
by the other component and by the interaction between both.
You should read the facts of both theories carefully (for EU, I suggest "thunderbolts project"), and you’ll see the potential of joining those two
theories into one, much more precise and complete theory. But here I’ll give you some examples to save you time:
a) Comets: Many think these are rocks flying in emptiness (space), and they are. But there is much more that is unexplained about them. Phenomena like
their brightening (halos), their tails and their life-time can't be explained by a rock flying in emptiness and heating up. It wouldn't be as bright
and with such tail (and described heats when passing near the Sun) would make comets disintegrate relatively quickly. But comets often survive and
even come back like Comet Halley.
b) Sun: the best example is the impossibility by current theory to explain that the outer layer (corona) is hotter that the layer below it. But EU
explains it quite easily. If an object moves through a charge field, a hot region is formed around it, shown by plasma physics. So, the Sun is moving
at 217 km/s though space and at such speed, the effect is quite important.
c) Lightning: other than the lightnings between Earth and clouds, there are “jets of lightning” that go from clouds to space. This would be
impossible unless there is a way for them to travel in space and so, for space to be charged.
d) Black Holes: these do not exist (as said in many scientific magazines). But similar effects can be shown by EU. Imagine an very high concentration
of electric energy and remember Einstein’s equation E=mc^2. What happens is that high concentrations of energy can behave (especially when viewed
from big distances) literally as objects having those astonishing masses calculated for black holes (in millions of Suns)
e) Galaxies, Dark Matter and Dark Energy: these “dark” concepts appeared from balancing equations to explain how galaxies didn't fall apart (dark
matter) and to explain why galaxies were going away from each other. But never have been proven and never will. Now from the point of view of EU, if
the region of the galaxy is charged and the effects of this on the matter in the galaxy, can explain why it stays together and all the "missing
mass" (again E=mc^2). For the galaxies accelerating away from us (dark energy) is based on red-shift calculations and expanding universe. But both of
these have facts proving them wrong, like red-shifts of stars going faster than light and galaxies older than the universe itself. EU hasn't yet an
exact explanation for this but if you consider that 99.9% of universe is plasma (like studies suggest) which is very conductive, then red-shift would
be greatly affected and new ways of calculating distances will need to be found.
Well, I could talk about this and more all day long, and give more examples, but have to put some limits. So,
Tan Tan!!! Finished
Now, for those that read this carefully and with an open-mind:
I’m not saying this is the complete truth, but I’m trying to make you understand that if you see things black or white, you’ll never know the
truth. Every idea and concept has a truth behind it. Understanding this one will make you go further, make you realize more than before, make you be
closer to the truth.
If you wish to comment, do so. I love new ideas!!! Let this be a Post with really constructive ideas.
But if you want to make useless emotional-based critiques, keep it to yourself, and re-read this post calmly. If you really have something against
what I said, message me and if I have time (got to study too xD), I’ll answer to you.
Have a good day ATS !!!