posted on Oct, 25 2013 @ 01:29 PM
reply to post by canDarian
Connecting the dots.
This may explain part of the reason Obama has fired so many generals this year.
9 Generals Fired, 2 Military Leaders Suspended
Nine commanding Generals have been fired, and two other leaders are on suspension, in a historic military shake up.
In our story from last week, we covered the historic occurrence of two top-ranking nuclear chief’s fired....
Remember, as (former White House chief of staff) Rahm Emanuel said, never waste a crisis,” a senior retired general told
TheBlaze on the condition of anonymity because he still provide services to the government and fears possible retribution.
“Even as a retired general, it’s still possible for the administration to make life miserable for us. If we’re working with the government or
have contracts, they can just rip that out from under us,” he said.
Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, said the White House fails to take action or
investigate its own, but finds it easy to fire military commanders “who have given their lives for their country.”
“Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely said. “The White House
protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s intentionally weakening and
gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”....
Clinton sell our military secrets to China, SEE LINK
And in case you do not believe that because it is a blog, here it is spelled out by the New York Times:
...Releasing many of America's nuclear secrets was seen as an essential part of this strategy, since it would signal a new global order
in which nuclear know-how was suddenly and irreparably devalued and real security would lie in the collective knowledge that nobody was able to
push weaponry beyond the known boundaries. What had been gold would become dross, and the atom would lose power and prestige. Driven by such logic,
the Administration made public masses of generalities about nuclear arms, even as specific weapon designs were kept secret.
[n]Now, however, critics charge that the gamble failed -- that the explosion last year of nuclear devices by India and Pakistan and the reports that
China has stolen America's top designs for nuclear arms have demonstrated that the test ban is fatally flawed. The depth and breadth of China's
spying, they add, makes the world's largest state seem quite hungry for a thoroughly modernized nuclear force, test-ban treaty or no....
A real one two punch by our TRAITORS - in - Chief.
Our young men are nothing but cannon fodder for the banksters!
Top Senate Democrat: bankers “own” the U.S. Congress Dick Durbin's confession ought to be major
news, yet it won't be. Why not?
Probably because the banks OWN the news media too.
JP Morgan: Our next big media player?
They neglect to mention that JP Morgan bought out the News Media in 1915.
Congressional Record: JP
Morgan & Co purchased all major media for propaganda: 1917. And now...?
(well worth the read)
The Congressional Record documenting the moves by JP Morgan was dated 1917 but the buyout used to get the USA in WWI was before that in 1915.
The actual time line is
Dec 1913 - Federal Reserve Act becomes law.
July 1914 - Income tax Amnendment said to be ratified.
1915 - JP Morgan buys major news papers.
April 6, 1917 - U.S. Entered World War I
Prior to 1917 the USA had an isolationist attitude of mind your own. After 1913 there was a way to get citizens to pay the bankers for wars. American
soldiers have been Cannon Fodder for the international Elite ever since.