It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Did I mention he was the first to talk about the New World Order to the American public?
A big idea, whose time has come.
Like a thousand points of light.
In 1928, the leading British Round Table strategist, H.G.
Wells, wrote The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World
Revolution (New York: Doubleday, Doran and Company).
The Open Conspiracy is Wells' Mein Kampf — a recipe for
how to establish a world government that would, over time,
perhaps even over generations, recruit individuals and set
up institutions to create a world "directorate" to run a "new
Wells does not stand in opposition to fascism or commu-
nism, he merely sees these forms as experiments or immature
expressions of the "new order" which will be replaced by his
vision of the new order.
By the time the first edition of Wells' Open Conspiracy
bible had appeared, institutions like the Rhodes Trust, the
Round Table, the British Fabian Society, the Royal Institute
of International Affairs, and its New York City adjunct, the
Council on Foreign Relations, were already engaged in the
process of recruiting successive generations of agents, agents-
of-influence, and agents provocateurs, to the One World ban-
ner. Wells' The Open Conspiracy gave focus to the effort,
stating bluntly the long-term objectives, and highlighting the
critical importance of selecting and recruiting the best and
the brightest, albeit corrupted, minds — what Wells called the
Three-quarters of a century later, Wells' "Open Conspir-
acy" is still trying to prevail.
reply to post by FlyersFan
I've heard no one say it yet, but what's wrong with a Cruz/Paul ticket for prez/vp?
As much as I've seen, and read for that matter, Paul isnt his dad, but still holds some of the same beliefs and Cruz is entirely a small gov't true Tea repub. I realize my vote doesnt matter in the slightest since its all a predetermined future, but if in case it does, then that could be the best proposition.
If you blame Clinton for de-regulation of the banks, then you are continuing on with the process of being duped again. It was the repub congress that pushed the banking de-regulation, and denying that is pure ignorance.
Obama got shoe horned into the democratic slot in order to keep Hillary out.
How long can they keep so many people fooled?
A new reich will be born. Well played, Prescott. Well played.
Brilliant, innit? I always marvel at how they orchestrate and manage this multi-layered tapestry of international machiavellian power-gaming and myriad arms of an ever transforming hypno-psychoactive octopus.
reply to post by Skyfloating
People forget what a family name used to mean, and what it still does for some.
Its not about the individual its about honoring and advancement of the power of the family, they forget thats how many used to operate.
Its not about one life time, its about several all working toward one goal, theres power in that, and its a bit dangerous.
ETA: It is also the antithesis of what america is about, You deserve nothing by birth, only what you earn by your merit. We fought concepts of divine right by blood.edit on 25-10-2013 by benrl because: (no reason given)