posted on Oct, 24 2013 @ 10:34 AM
But the whole story IS about race. Notice how the reports emphsize the children are BLOND. Why? As i mentioned before, given the fact that several
of the other children in the family were within a few monthes of each other and could not have come from the same mother, WHY DIDN'T THEY TAKE DNA
FROM THOSE CHILDREN??? Further, whenever the news is focused on a single incident, I have to wonder why? Child trafficking is apparently a huge
problem, involving more than this ONE or TWO, 'blond' children. Why focus on THIS one?
Doesn't anyone else find it odd that two stories of blond children 'rescued' from gypsy camps appear within such a short time frame when prior to
this, I can't remember a time when a story like this appeared front and center in the MSM.
I also find it odd that no one on this forum has even questioned the facts in this situation as presented by the MSM. I find it so strange that
seemingly aware people never think to question whether or not an event, as presented by the MSM, even happened. As the lines blur between reality TV
and reality, I have to wonder if they don't just make most of the news up. Not a new idea. Hearst made millions doing it. Why not just make up the
news whole cloth. No need for reporters and expensive crews. It can all be done in the studio and you never have to worry about the undertainty in
the REAL word and a 'no news' day.
AND you can facilitate hatred between the outcasts.....the 99% of us.