Mall in Kenya's Massacre & WTC towers in NYC: Same Owner

page: 1
22
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 22 2013 @ 10:03 PM
link   
goldenageofgaia.com...

Frank Lowy of Westfield Group apparently owns Kenya Mall, as well as owned WTC jointly with Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties

I know its just a random niche site I quoted from and I'm new here so dunno even if yall taked about this ready, but its new to me and if there's a smoking bullet (aside from the White Widow), this is it in the Kenya Massacre.


Westgate mall was built by The Westfield group in 2007:
en.wikipedia.org...:Shopping_malls_established_in_2007
WestgateKenya
Are we supposed to believe that this little girl is standing calmly next to a dead body and the camera man doesn’t try to MOVE HER? Instead, he snaps a picture? Come on!
2. The Westfield Group is owned by a man named Frank Lowy.
The same Frank Lowy, who along with Larry Silverstien, made a fortune in the 9-11 “attacks”
Fifty days before 9/11, Larry Silverstein’s Silverstein Properties and Frank Lowy’s Westfield America secured a 99-year lease on World Trade Center Buildings One, Two, Four and Five. Silverstein already owned Building Seven, aka the Salomon building. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey handed over control of the World Trade Center to Silverstein and Lowy on July 24, 2001.
3. Property owned by the Westfield group has a history of being “attacked”.
Is all this a coincidence. Maybe, but I don’t think so.
This is a list of all West field properties associated with attacks of terror on your brain since 9-11.
September 21, 2005: Westfield Mall in Perth, Australia, bomb threat.
May 17, 2006: Westfield Woden, Australia, bomb threat.
July 21, 2007: Westfield Centre Derby, England, bomb threat that caused the evacuation of Westfield buildings.
March 1, 2008: Westfield Old Orchard Mall, Skokie, Illinois, bomb threat.
April 20, 2009: Westfield Annapolis Hotel, bomb threat.
September 20, 2008: Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan, bombing.
July 17, 2008: Marriott Hotel in Jakarta, Indonesia, bombing.
en.wikipedia.org...




posted on Oct, 22 2013 @ 10:07 PM
link   
Very......interesting.

I'll comment after I dig into this a bit.

Thanks OP!



posted on Oct, 22 2013 @ 10:11 PM
link   

gardener
Frank Lowy of Westfield Group apparently owns Kenya Mall, as well as owned WTC jointly with Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties


They did not own the WTC.... if they cannot get a simple fact like that correct!



posted on Oct, 22 2013 @ 10:16 PM
link   
Interesting, huh? I had heard that little tidbit of info during the time of the attack and immediately wondered if all the grenade attacks were perhaps part of a plot to destroy the mall for the insurance money. If I owned an insurance company, I would think twice and maybe even three times before insuring those guys.



posted on Oct, 22 2013 @ 10:17 PM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


The guy is a scumbag. He upped his insurance policy on the wtc a few months before the attack.
Made a huge profit on the insurance policies.
No surprise here



posted on Oct, 22 2013 @ 10:23 PM
link   
Zionist banksters..

How do they get away with this? One billion-making massacre after another!




posted on Oct, 22 2013 @ 10:31 PM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


Frank Lowy...

...I don't know...




posted on Oct, 22 2013 @ 10:36 PM
link   
Who are the real players responsible for engineering a self-serving "war on terror," which was precipitated by the mysterious 9/11 attacks on America?

edit on 22-10-2013 by seasoul because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 01:08 AM
link   

PtolemyII
He upped his insurance policy on the wtc a few months before the attack.


Sure about that?



Made a huge profit on the insurance policies.


not really
www.911myths.com...

And those who want to believe Silverstein still had foreknowledge of the attacks, might want to consider this: In its court papers, Swiss Re shows how Silverstein first tried to buy just $1.5 billion in property damage and business-interruption coverage. When his lenders objected, he discussed buying a $5 billion policy. Ultimately, he settled on the $3.5 billion figure, which was less than the likely cost of rebuilding. www.forbes.com...



No surprise here


No surprise truthers keep coming up with the same much debunked nonsense about 9/11....



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 01:16 AM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 



wow hit a nerve with you did it....think might need to look into lowry a bit further before you just scream....foul



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 03:15 AM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


He may own shares, that's it. It's a partnership between several people. One of them being the areas Richest King Pins, he's super super super super rich. I mean the people that work for him drive Rolls Royce's and Bugatti's (Tax + Duty = the same price as the car, technically you're buying one car for the price of two). He appeared several times in the wiki-leaks cables, they accused him of drug trafficking. He's still free, in fact the American ambassador was forced to retire after making allegations against him.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 10:09 AM
link   
reply to post by gardener
 


I am alerting this thread for BLATANT anti-semitic hatred.

SHAME ON YOU, OP...... you vicious anti-semite.

edit on 23-10-2013 by sk0rpi0n because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 10:38 AM
link   
reply to post by sk0rpi0n
 


First off it is not ANTI SEMITE....it is ANTI ZIONISM now if for one second you think being against a zionist is being against a jew...just look up JEWS against zionism....people are completely against the POLICTICAL ZIONIST movement i speak it out loud...and i have the uptmost sympathy for all JEWS who get tarnished with the zionist brush.

so be careful how you toss around the anti semitic card...because it will come back at you ten fold by myself and others who deplore the rothschilds scum sucking zionist banking movement which threatens the very survival of all peoples indebted to those scum.

other than that please have a wonderful day.
edit on 103131p://f40Wednesday by plube because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 10:48 AM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 


Truther?
You know NOTHING about my views on 911.for instance, do you know I'm a NYC Paramedic, and a 911 First Responder, and I know 13 people who died ON 911,AND dozens of my Co workers have all died since, all of cancer.
You know I spent days there digging out body parts of people I even knew... We identified them by only the ID tag on their uniforms.
You knew that right?
You know I also responded to the FIRST bombing in 1993,and I have mayoral commendations from gullianni and Dinkens for both incidents.
You know that my best friends husband was kidnapped and executed in Iraq while investigating the LIES perpetrated by our government about the war, and then the FBI just swept his murder all under the carpet.
Right..... You knew all of this and what I know about 911.

How about you are another one of those people who find more LIES on line and post them all over so no one actually ever finds out the truth about all of this.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 10:53 AM
link   
the anti sematizm thing is like the racsist - because - you - know - obamacare - is - a - scam - thing, or the if- you - don't agree - with - this - illegal - war- you - are - a - terrorist thing

eta
wow, and i thought derailers were the doohicky on the rear wheel of my mountain bike that changes the gears
edit on 23-10-2013 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 11:00 AM
link   
reply to post by sk0rpi0n
 


Where was it anti semitic?
I condone it in no way shape of form. If it is antisemitic, I missed it.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 11:07 AM
link   
what ever Larry got at 911 it was better then the asbestos removal bill he was on the hook for was going to be,
so thats the end of that little aside right there.

there is no such thing as coincidence in this type of thing
In cases like this, as any LEO will tell you, its called M.O.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 11:17 AM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 



Fifty days before 9/11, Larry Silverstein's Silverstein Properties and Frank Lowy's Westfield America secured a 99-year lease on World Trade Center Buildings One, Two, Four and Five. Silverstein already owned Building Seven. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey handed over control of the World Trade Center to Silverstein and Lowy on July 24, 2001. Lowy leased the shopping concourse area called the Mall at the World Trade
Center, made up of approximately 427,000 square feet of retail floor space. Silverstein and Westfield America insured the complex for $3.55 billion, but after the attacks of September 11 lodged a claim for $7.1 billion on the premise that each plane collision constituted a separate act of terrorism, doubling the payout. Most people know about "Lucky" Larry Silverstein's part in 9/11 and his dubious connections to Binyamin Netanyahu et al, but not much has been reported on Lowy, so let's have a look.


this is from my signature thread....

just read it before you scream again that people don't know what they are talking about....

do you remember Larry succeeded in getting paid out for EACH building.

god I wrote this one years ago.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 11:31 AM
link   
reply to post by PtolemyII
 


No worries there was nothing anti Semitic...just ignore it....it seems to be the catch phrase when people speak of Zionism....but I guess it would figure since it was the Zionists who coined the term in the first place


Anti-Semitism (also spelled antisemitism) is a term and contemporary epithet which has been used in a variety of contexts by different people and organisations, though it was originally invented in 1860 by a liberal Jew named Moritz Steinschneider,[1] the son of a Talmudist born in Moravia. In its initial coining, it was applied in a criticism of Ernest Renan's contrast of Semites and Indo-Europeans, though at this stage was in a wider more general context than just opposition to Jewishness. It was the socialist Wilhelm Marr who popularised the term in the 1870s with his League of Anti-Semites, applying it to himself in a positive sense primarily in his attacks on Jewish finance, but also in regard to their non-assimilationism in wider society.[2]

The earliest self-identifying "anti-semites" or those figures whom the term was applied to, were generally non-Marxian socialists who came to regard Jewishness and its values system, as the most anti-social form of the unrestrained bourgeoisie following the Industrial Revolution. This had coincided with the ascent of various monopolistic Jewish financial dynasties in Europe and soon North America following their "emancipation". For a time, the phrase was adopted by certain integral nationalists, especially in France such as Action Française. The phrase had its critics from the start and was regarded as inaccurate by people such as Eugen Dühring and largely fell out of use as a self-identifying term by the 1920s.

"Anti-anti-semitism" has led to mass murder on an industrial scale; following the Jewish coup d'etat in Russia in 1917 for instance, so-called "anti-semitism" was a "crime" punishable by death, often by shooting in the back of the head. Today the thought police continue their war against people who criticise the legion of Jewish crimes against humanity by throwing "anti-semites" into modern gulags (ie - prisons) in many parts of Europe or bring them to ruin financially. While in other parts of the world, particularly the United States, social ostracism is enforced. Because Jews believe they are a race "chosen" by God above the rest of humanity, they believe they can commit atrocities with impunity and the mere goyim have no business asking them to limit or take account of their grotesque behaviour. You can criticise any group in the world; Finns, Chinese, Ethiopians, Eskimos, etc as much as you like; but you are not allowed to have a different opinion about the Master Race of Holy People, that is beyond the pale.


ANTI SEMITE

the term is now being replaced by the term terrorist so that it can cover a much broader spectrum in my opinion

like because we might be Truthers...therefore we are terrorists.

Sad days ahead for those who want nothing more than to have their questions answered....and woe be to those who blindly believe what their MSM and Government tells them.



posted on Oct, 23 2013 @ 11:40 AM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 


I guess we won't be getting an oops sorry people ...I was wrong from you huh Bruce....I mean the sting when you use the word Truthers...even when it is shown to be true....should I also post an article from Rueters....(considered a reliable news source). which states the same....

Consider what you say when you use the word Truther with such distain that you know something....It might just be the truth.





top topics
 
22
<<   2 >>

log in

join