why do so many people now believe in 9/11 conspiracies
Because people are waking up to the facts of the case as presented by professional organizations such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth,
Scientists for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice
, for instance.
And believing in alternate 9/11 conspiracies is no different than believing the official conspiracy. They're all conspiracies. Both sides.
It's just that one side is presenting a better case with evidence than the other side. The official conspiracy side of it just says "this is the way
it happened because we said so". The alternate conspiracy side of it says "this is the way we think it happened based on all available
And its not a good thing.
Why is it not a good thing? Who's the authority that gets to decide whether it's a good thing or not? I think what you meant to say is that it's
not a good thing in your own opinion
To those of us who have researched 9/11 extensively, it is a good thing. It means more and more people keep waking up to what is likely the real truth
about what happened on that day.
The problem, as I see it, is the existence whole army of keyboard warriors of truth who are out to impose their version of 9/11 truth on to the whole
spectrum of social media.
Are we seriously going to label the 9/11 families as keyboard warriors? They are the ones that started the 9/11 truth movement to begin with by asking
questions, not getting answers, and doing their own investigating.
Are we seriously going to label architects, engineers, scientists, physicists, psychologists, many with PhD's, as keyboard warriors?
I don't think so.
It is now almost impossible to research 9/11 without being confronted with page after page of 9/11 conspiracies.
That would include conspiracies from both
sides. And that is a good thing. People should get both sides of the story when researching any
But yes, alternate conspiracies concerning 9/11 are plentiful around the internet. And most people don't even have any knowledge about alternate
theories. At least they'll have a plethora of information to educate themselves with.
and pump out lots of truther propaganda.
That is a little below the belt, and a bit harsh. However, architects, engineers, scientists, physicists, and psychologists, many with PhD's, aren't
in the business of putting their careers and good name on the line, just to spew "truther propaganda" because it's fun and they have nothing else
better to do.
There's real evidence to be presented, and people are waking up to the evidence little by little, more and more.
9/11 truthers turn to them and ignore the 198,000 (at least) who it would seem disagree with them.
This claim gets parroted over and over again, no matter how incorrect and inaccurate it may be.
A person has to make it known publicly which side they choose to affiliate with before they can be lumped in with those that agree or disagree.
Silence, lack of public statement, does not automatically assume that they are against alternate conspiracies.
100,000 of the 198,000 could agree with the alternate 9/11 conspiracy theories. But we can't know for certain because they haven't stated one way or
the other. And it's very dishonest to claim that they will side one way or the other, just to perpetuate an agenda.
it is this strange idea that a very small minority of a group can be trusted in the face of a overwhelming majority who disagree with them
Again, lack of public statements by each individual is not an affirmation of their agreement with one side or another. Lack of public statements means
they don't count
Just like in elections. If you don't vote, you don't count.
Out of all the architects and engineers that have
made public statements, there are far more that agree with alternate 9/11 conspiracies than
agree with the official conspiracy.
Same goes with scientists and physicists. There are for more that believe in the alternate 9/11 conspiracy theories than believe in the official
who buy into their rubbish
It's amazing to think that some of the most-educated people in the world with MS, BS, and PhD degrees, are just propagating rubbish because one
doesn't agree with their message.
We should contact all the universities that these people went to, and tell these universities that what they're teaching people is rubbish and that
MS, BS, and PhD's don't mean anything anymore.
Oh wait, we can't. Because official conspiracy theory proponents go to those same universities.
That is what I see 9/11 truth as doing, steeling history for future generations, robbing them of the truth
"Robbing them of the truth"? Again, on who's authority does it fall on to say what's true and what is not? Does the official conspiracy theory
automatically become true just because a government entity says it's true, and without providing a shred of physical or forensic evidence?
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) stated very clearly at the beginning of their report that the majority of evidence was
sealed under non-disclosure agreements (NA's). That means nobody gets to see what evidence they used to reach their conclusions. You don't get to
see what evidence they used, but you have to take their word for it because they say so.
Sorry, but that doesn't work in the real world of science and research.
they are not about truth they are about lies
Again, "lies" in your
own opinion. The scientific, forensic, audio/visual evidence, along with witness testimony say otherwise.
it is an attempt to balance the truth and the lies
And again, who gets to dictate or have authority over what is truth and what is lies? This thread was just an opinion piece. There's zero evidence
here proving truth or lies about anything.
They are simply replacing the established historical narrative they disagree with
The same can be said about this thread. You disagree with anything 9/11 truth, so it automatically because "lies". It's called 9/11 "truth" for a
reason. Because factual evidence makes something truthful.
Otherwise, it would be just for fun, then it could be called 9/11 "lies".