It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rick Santorum’s speech at the Values Voter Summit this past weekend is an excellent example of the form. He delivered an inane, inaccurate lecture about the French revolution, describing it as doomed from the get-go because the revolutionaries believed in “equality, liberty, and fraternity,” which he contrasted with the Americans who supposedly believed in “paternity,” i.e. the theory that rights come from God. Rick Santorum debated the long-dead French revolutionaries, assuming that the word “fraternity” was an attempt to avoid admitting there was a God and then blaming everything bad that happened to France since then on its secularist government.
......break.....
Second of all, by claiming that rights come from the god of fundamentalist Christians, conservatives can simply dismiss the idea that the rest of us have a right not to have their religion imposed on us. Santorum was very clear on this point, angrily railing that the secular view of rights meant that while Christians are allowed to go to church, they are prevented from imposing their views on others. Since rights come “from God,” in his view, an employer who believes in that God has a right to toy with a woman’s insurance benefits to try to stop her from using contraception. The “rights come from God” argument is used to distort the very idea of religious freedom.
Magister
The writers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and those who signed it, were mostly Christians. But they considered these natural rights to belong to all "men", regardless of their religious beliefs.
The writers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and those who signed it, were mostly Christians. But they considered these natural rights to belong to all "men", regardless of their religious beliefs.
Grimpachi
I know a lot of people do not read links. I have been guilty of it at times but here is an example of why this is an issue. Though I wish it wasn’t.
Rick Santorum’s speech at the Values Voter Summit this past weekend is an excellent example of the form. He delivered an inane, inaccurate lecture about the French revolution, describing it as doomed from the get-go because the revolutionaries believed in “equality, liberty, and fraternity,” which he contrasted with the Americans who supposedly believed in “paternity,” i.e. the theory that rights come from God. Rick Santorum debated the long-dead French revolutionaries, assuming that the word “fraternity” was an attempt to avoid admitting there was a God and then blaming everything bad that happened to France since then on its secularist government.
......break.....
Second of all, by claiming that rights come from the god of fundamentalist Christians, conservatives can simply dismiss the idea that the rest of us have a right not to have their religion imposed on us. Santorum was very clear on this point, angrily railing that the secular view of rights meant that while Christians are allowed to go to church, they are prevented from imposing their views on others. Since rights come “from God,” in his view, an employer who believes in that God has a right to toy with a woman’s insurance benefits to try to stop her from using contraception. The “rights come from God” argument is used to distort the very idea of religious freedom.
onthedownlow
reply to post by Grimpachi
Our country was founded on Christian principals. It is completely accurate to say that our rights come from God, as did the founders believe, though the revisionists on the left would have you believe that the founders thought up the Constitution during a late night soiree at an out of the way bath house or bed and breakfast. The separation of church and state was intended to keep the church from influencing policy and to promote religious tolerance. The Bill of Rights was added to insure that government had no charge in these rights, that they would be protected and inalienable. If the left does manage to curtail or destroy the first amendment, all the rest will fall.
seeker1963
But then again, the government has proven that by separating us and dividing us into "categories" that they gain more power over us.
olaru12
Magister
The writers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and those who signed it, were mostly Christians. But they considered these natural rights to belong to all "men", regardless of their religious beliefs.
Right....
unless you were black or native American; then all bets are off....
InverseLookingGlass
onthedownlow
reply to post by Grimpachi
Our country was founded on Christian principals. It is completely accurate to say that our rights come from God, as did the founders believe, though the revisionists on the left would have you believe that the founders thought up the Constitution during a late night soiree at an out of the way bath house or bed and breakfast. The separation of church and state was intended to keep the church from influencing policy and to promote religious tolerance. The Bill of Rights was added to insure that government had no charge in these rights, that they would be protected and inalienable. If the left does manage to curtail or destroy the first amendment, all the rest will fall.
Why don't you list some of those Christian principles for the rest of us?
I'll start:
-killing infidels & heretics
-dominion over everything you can shake a stick at.
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
The article is on political ideology’s hence the reason it is in this forum. Ideologies have been divisive long before you or I have walked these lands. The issue is some extremists are trying to re-write the history of this nation to conform to their religious beliefs.
Should everyone just keep quiet about it and let it happen or drag the issue out into the light for everyone to see what it really is. A power grab.
Well I will not look the other way but good news is I am not making anyone read these threads either. You may not like my threads but at the same time they were not made specifically for you either and you are free to make your own on the subjects that interest you. I did.
Working "TOGETHER" is how we solve problems. Making everyone whom doesn't have the same ideology as we do, does nothing more than MAKE OUR PROBLEMS WORSE.........
Why would you want to work with sinners? Aren't we the problem?