reply to post by cfnyaami
absolutely. Agenda 21 is about authoritarianism and control. When someone is an effective speaker on the subject, the political attack is
inevitable. The forces pushing for agenda 21 will do everything they can to CRUSH their critics, from violent assaults, to frivolous lawsuits (I'll
reference the kimberlain affair as another example). This agenda is about applying a sweeping generalization to the entire population, where there is
no judging individuals upon their own merits and ability to make the changes needed themselves to be in balance with the environment.
I have made a few threatening moves towards the system. One of those moves has been to work on developing an open source platform to make industrial
automation at home more affordable. What I want to do, FOR FREE (quite literally) if need be, is to empower people to feed themselves, and protect
themselves against GMO, with a system. This in my opinion is the easiest way to address industrialized farming (large-scale) and to address food
supply issues (so that there is less waste, and so that people can live longer than 3 days if the grocery stores were to shut down -- in fact the plan
is to empower people to live indefinitely if that happens).
To that extent I have slowly built my electrical up to include a touch screen controller and a SOM running a custom compiled linux kernel, integration
with firmata and a mega, and the android operating system for ease of use handling GUI. I've also come up with a modular design so that people can
put together their own solution using a variety of parts (very flexible) that can be more easily adapted to suit individual needs.
What I want is for people, if they are so willing, to be given a chance to sustainably develop themselves without arbitrarily being stamped as
incompetent by this system and treated accordingly, because it is entirely ethically wrong (and the fact that the system cannot deal with individuals
and isn't willing to prove that their involvement in micromanaging people's lives is necessary on a per individual basis).
I have a history of demonstrating the hypocrisy of various agenda 21 proponents, and their minions. I have given their government approved movement
so many black eyes, that they have to do whatever it takes to shut me up. Some of my colleagues have endured similar treatment as well.
We are all in this together, but as an environmentalist my personal belief is that technology today has never better empowered individuals who are
dedicated to tailoring their own individual impact -- the reason why I am developing my electronics as an automations controller is because I have
more than 1 application for it. For example, a few years ago I swapped out incandescent lighting in favor of CF (I know I don't like CF's either).
I have then carefully examined my power usage, and recently have begun to phase out the CF's in favor of LED bulbs. With the CF's my power usage
was thrashed to a quarter of what the previous occupant had used (per capita). This is with an inefficient fridge and a crappy stove, which I've
arranged to have replaced (so more savings there), and I'll eventually take one of my finished prototypes and put it to use in handling the lighting
in my living space to slash that even more.
Here's a post I made a while ago demonstrating a little
of what I am up to with regards to this project
As an activist, the smart grid is authoritarianism, but that is not to say I do not want computer management, I'd just rather have open source code,
open hardware, the ability to have many eyes looking it over and making sure it is safe and free of backdoors, and the OWNER/USER needs to have their
fingers on the buttons, not the government nor the power company.
I ascribe to libertarian perspectives. In this town, the environmentalist movement is ran by communists (anarcho-communists) who advocate
authoritarianism and agenda 21. Anything that competes with that message is dangerous to their agenda. Anybody with a talent for referencing,
documenting, naming the names, naming the organizations, and providing the associations, is precisely what these A21 proponents are terrified of.
Basically what I am pointing out, is A21 employs political character assassination, and in this country where not one community has stood up against
it outright and sought another way, one of the worst places is Victoria BC -- it is bought and sold on A21. It attempts to paralyze people with fear
so that the voices against it simply remain silent.
This is my own personal account, my own journey, and agreed it is complicated, I decided that the consequences of what these people have done to steal
the food off of my table have been so deleterious to my health that if I don't say something, there'll be grave consequences for myself. I'm
already suffering from visible malnutrition, I suppose I could have not spent what I did on my project towards gaining independence and
self-sufficiency, but that is all I want to work towards, without progress in this cause I simply feel dead inside.
I hope this clarifies things somewhat. The issue with copyright is pretty cut and dry, it is only the opportunity to use the system as a weapon that
this individual has engaged in the suit. It is very close to summary trial. This is about a political persecution, and believe me, I thought this
country I lived in was more civilized than that (apparently not, I am disgusted, and so are the people around me who have had to watch this