It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FreeMason
...it doesn't mean everything is literal
FreeMason
Also, it basically explains there is a lot more than a single day taking place during the days,
alfa1
FreeMason
...it doesn't mean everything is literal
Dangerous slippry slope that you would have been killed for suggesting not too long ago. Because if you cant really believe what some bits of the bible are saying, then what about other bits such as those relating to Jesus? He didnt really die and get ressurected. Cant take it literally.
FreeMason
Also, it basically explains there is a lot more than a single day taking place during the days,
The "day-age" theory was discredited as soon as it was invented. Multiple problems, such as those of plants growing without the sun, reptiles being "out of order", and of many plants needing the insects for pollination that didnt get made until "days" later.
edit on 15-10-2013 by alfa1 because: (no reason given)
But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
After a century of excavations trying to prove the ancient accounts true, archeologists say there is no conclusive evidence that the Israelites were ever in Egypt, were ever enslaved, ever wandered in the Sinai wilderness for 40 years or ever conquered the land of Canaan under Joshua's leadership. To the contrary, the prevailing view is that most of Joshua's fabled military campaigns never occurred--archeologists have uncovered ash layers and other signs of destruction at the relevant time at only one of the many battlegrounds mentioned in the Bible.
Today, the prevailing theory is that Israel probably emerged peacefully out of Canaan--modern-day Lebanon, southern Syria, Jordan and the West Bank of Israel--whose people are portrayed in the Bible as wicked idolators. Under this theory, the Canaanites who took on a new identity as Israelites were perhaps joined or led by a small group of Semites from Egypt--explaining a possible source of the Exodus story, scholars say. As they expanded their settlement, they may have begun to clash with neighbors, perhaps providing the historical nuggets for the conflicts recorded in Joshua and Judges.
"Scholars have known these things for a long time, but we've broken the news very gently," said William Dever, a professor of Near Eastern archeology and anthropology at the University of Arizona and one of America's preeminent archeologists.
Also, it basically explains there is a lot more than a single day taking place during the days, it says God created the Earth in 6 days is supposed to be literal, but then we have a passage clearly showing us that the world was made but mankind was not yet made (which he was made in the 6th day) so there is more than a day passing there.
And the evening and the morning were the first day.
And the evening and the morning were the second day
And the evening and the morning were the third day
And the evening and the morning were the fourth day
And the evening and the morning were the fifth day
And the evening and the morning were the sixth day
--the Bible we own, which we work on and which I'm about to tell you something about, is a Bible that was fixed between the 7th and the 9th century A.D. That is to say, in the years 600-800 A.D., in short, it's when the Merovigs first and then the Carolings ruled over Europe.
I mean that while Charlemagne was building his Holy Roman Empire.
By the lake of Galilee, one family, wich was Moshhez ben Aaron ben Asher's family, defined the Bible as we know it.
--This family was in conflict with other families: they represented the Tiberias school . There was the Palestinian school, the Samaritan one, the Babylonian one. They won....
If someone else would have won, we now would have a potentially different Bible.
That is the pictogram made by those that saw the first RUACH, which is where the RUACH of the Hebrews come from.
So, that is a thing we don't know what it is, let say we don't know it, so we can take it easy, but which decidedly hovers on the water.
---As we don't know what it is, we'll name it by borrowing the name directly from the Vatica, so that we won't go wrong.
If you read last editions of the “Lexicon Recentis Latinitatis”, published by the “:Liberia Editrice Vatican” where they insert the latin neologisms, you'll find that the Vatican inserted “navis sideralis”, which means “starship” They inserted “areia navis”, thus “airship”, they inserted “aireus viator”, that is “astronaut” and they inserted an acronym, “R.I.V” which means: res inexplicatae volantes”, that is UFO's.
---The ones of you that just saw that stuff now will realize that it's an unknown thing that hovers on the water.