posted on Oct, 15 2013 @ 05:06 AM
reply to post by Jefferton
Impeachment? I think we should call in a Catholic priest and perform the Rite of Exorcism on the lot of them.
Why would anyone consider the impeachment of BHO anyhow? He's well loved (worshiped even) by the electorate who form the 'base' of his operations so
as to ply his 'craft,' as in witchcraft, hence the need for the Rite of Exorcism
to purify the contamination caused by totalitarian
collectivism in Washington D.C. As you can see, I was only 1/2 joking there, but you all probably think I'm exaggerating - well I'm NOT!
Impeachments are actually 'show trials' - witness Clinton, and then the preparations for the 'almost' impeachment of R.M. Nixon, (which was
tantamount to an actual trial) who resigned rather than be made a mockery of by the opposition. When you see progressive liberals calling for BHO's
head then you'll know its possible - otherwise its so much straw 'blowin in the wind.'
Does BHO fit the description (below) any more than say Nancy Pelosi - or whomever in the Senate and/or House? I think not! Those doing the impeaching
would themselves all be guilty of impeachable offenses.
An Impeachable offense
refers to an offense for which a public official may legally be removed from office. The impeachment of an official
depends upon the vote in the U.S. The U.S. Constitution states that the President, Vice President and all civil officers of the U.S. may be removed
from office on impeachment if they are found guilty of any treason, bribery, and other high crimes.
The Supreme's held that three categories of conduct may constitute an impeachable offense by a state officer:
1.An act that violates a statute, constitutional provision, or oath and is related to the officer's duties;
2.A simple neglect of duty committed for a corrupt purpose; or
3.A neglect or disregard of duty that is so gross or flagrant and also the officer's willful and corrupt intent may be inferred.
edit on 15-10-2013 by YodHeVauHe because: (no reason given)