posted on Oct, 11 2013 @ 09:37 AM
reply to post by buster2010
Obama is the Chief Executive, right? This is an Executive Branch segment of the U.S. Government, is it not? Therefore, Barack Obama is singularly
heading this and all other agencies of the Executive Branch, yes?
It's certainly true the man, personally, cannot be taken to task for every individual statement and decision across the vast Government. Similarly, a
CEO of a major Corporation can't be held individually to blame (in real terms) if his underlings screw the pooch so bad it screams in English and
calls 911 with it's paws.
At the same time...Individually culpable and liable by chain to be blamed are radically different things, aren't they?
I mean, we are going to drop any and all blame, of any kind, on any THING Bush ever did as President which he didn't personally sign, personally say
or directly..as an individual man...order from his own lips ..if THIS is the standard. Same with Clinton, Reagan, Nixon..Johnson...
MOST of the programs we lay on President's feet aren't something they did, personally, through individual action....but that's why we call them the
Chief Executive. They run the ship, set the tone and determine the direction everyone below them follows.
..........like changing a whole medical diagnosis to make people feel good rather than have any basis whatsoever in science or fact. If the story is
accurate how it reads? It looks very typical for Executive Branch action since Jan. 2009. Indeed.