It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
kdyam
NotAnAspie
Happy1
reply to post by NotAnAspie
You people refuse to get it - The US is overwith - we've been sold down the river - by both dems and repubs - the only difference is in your own tiny minds, or you're just stupid.
We are going third world america here - they are going to steal everything you think you're entitled to away from you.
It's all gone.
Ummm... Your reply kinda suggests that you did not comprehend any part of what I said because I know the US is crashing. That is exactly what my post was about. My point is that war is not going to fix it (despite what some think) but that is what the gop wants. Obama has been along for the ride on part of that which is very discouraging... however, I think there are some even among them that see it isn't going to work and are second guessing the war plot and thinking about better foreign relations instead. We've sold ourselves too short by too much meddling. War isn't going to fix it... We are better off concentrating on good relations and not the military kind. If we scale back meddling, this will drastically cut the budget. Is that too hard to understand? Then, this would give an opportunity to shore up our own defenses, take care of our own people and make better future foreign deals so that we can still operate as our own free country.
If the gop leads us into large global war that we don't win.... you can kiss that freedom goodbye.
The one's who are most afraid of losing the big US status and are afraid of influence from other leaderships are the same ones willing to gamble it ALL. Throw the whole country on the table and put us all at risk. Genius. Real patriots there.
I'm not sure what is complicated about that... but I'm FULLY aware the US is spread too thin.
You can't see that in my post? Do you have a comprehension problem?
I have no idea what part of that you misunderstood.
I couldn't see it through the fog of your speculation and pure opinion. Please, continue to spread your "ideas" like butter on the doom porn sandwich you seem so eager to make. Oh.. and dont forget to belittle those of us who dont agree with you... that would be careless.. almost as careless as the entitlements and rampant spending Obama has passed to get us where we are today.
beezzer
The US has the ability to pay the debt if the ceiling isn't raised.
What would happen, though, is that our petulant-pouting-petty-president would "make it hurt" and punish the American people for not obeying him.
NotAnAspie
beezzer
The US has the ability to pay the debt if the ceiling isn't raised.
What would happen, though, is that our petulant-pouting-petty-president would "make it hurt" and punish the American people for not obeying him.
and your ideas since the treasury has indeed put a deadline on it?
that's not rhetorical. Let's hear your preferred solution.
darkbake
reply to post by TucoTheRat
You are correct, Tuco. How many Americans are really ready to live in a third world country? All of this political talk and everything, how many know what they are getting themselves into?
Many Americans I have met don't know much about being happy, and are entirely dependent on money and materialism. Look at all of the Republicans mocking the poor - yet they have a high potential to become poor themselves in less than a month or two.edit on 10-10-2013 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
beezzer
NotAnAspie
beezzer
The US has the ability to pay the debt if the ceiling isn't raised.
What would happen, though, is that our petulant-pouting-petty-president would "make it hurt" and punish the American people for not obeying him.
and your ideas since the treasury has indeed put a deadline on it?
that's not rhetorical. Let's hear your preferred solution.
Solutions?
Prioritise spending.
Work within a budget.
No new entitlement spending.
Bring home everyone in Afghanistan.
No more multi-billion dollar foreign aid packets.
Disband the department of education, turn it over to state levels.
Stop implementation of Obamacare.
Stop funding to the "arts".
Cancel funding to PBS, NPR.
Create a heavy import tax on foreign goods and bring back manufacturing to the US.
Drill for oil in the US, stop buying foreign oil.
No amnesty for illegal immigrants.
. . . . just off the top of my head. . .
NotAnAspie
kdyam
NotAnAspie
Happy1
reply to post by NotAnAspie
You people refuse to get it - The US is overwith - we've been sold down the river - by both dems and repubs - the only difference is in your own tiny minds, or you're just stupid.
We are going third world america here - they are going to steal everything you think you're entitled to away from you.
O
It's all gone.
Ummm... Your reply kinda suggests that you did not comprehend any part of what I said because I know the US is crashing. That is exactly what my post was about. My point is that war is not going to fix it (despite what some think) but that is what the gop wants. Obama has been along for the ride on part of that which is very discouraging... however, I think there are some even among them that see it isn't going to work and are second guessing the war plot and thinking about better foreign relations instead. We've sold ourselves too short by too much meddling. War isn't going to fix it... We are better off concentrating on good relations and not the military kind. If we scale back meddling, this will drastically cut the budget. Is that too hard to understand? Then, this would give an opportunity to shore up our own defenses, take care of our own people and make better future foreign deals so that we can still operate as our own free country.
If the gop leads us into large global war that we don't win.... you can kiss that freedom goodbye.
The one's who are most afraid of losing the big US status and are afraid of influence from other leaderships are the same ones willing to gamble it ALL. Throw the whole country on the table and put us all at risk. Genius. Real patriots there.
I'm not sure what is complicated about that... but I'm FULLY aware the US is spread too thin.
You can't see that in my post? Do you have a comprehension problem?
I have no idea what part of that you misunderstood.
I couldn't see it through the fog of your speculation and pure opinion. Please, continue to spread your "ideas" like butter on the doom porn sandwich you seem so eager to make. Oh.. and dont forget to belittle those of us who dont agree with you... that would be careless.. almost as careless as the entitlements and rampant spending Obama has passed to get us where we are today.
How are you even arguing with me if you can't even be clear on what it is you are arguing against?
SO... since I know how to read between the lines I assume that what you are saying is that you are totally comfortable with the part of the rampant spending that is unnecessary and is not even part of the debt.
Is someone coming after your cake? Is a big bad terrorist coming after your piggy bank?
I never once said that spending was not rampant, but that the defense budget is the part that will not be budged... no matter who it hurts. I guess you're cool with that... so go hold up somebody's granny and buy a gun if that makes you feel safe because I don't know what you are bitching about.
You accuse me of doom porn when you are promoting the idea that all is lost because of entitlement and reckless spending. And I'm saying that entitlement would not be as big of a problem if it were not for inflation and the predatory real estate market and general greed... as well as MUCH reckless defense spending.
Then you act like you are arguing with a post that you couldn't read? Brilliant. That's a good use of time.
Go waste somebody else's time unless you have the courage to spit out your real point... or can at least organize it in your own mind.
I think I get it... you got commie fears and think the solution is to starve people or something as if that even makes any sense seeing as how that will cause only more problems. If you want to argue, make a damn argument or something because you are just displaying "I'M MAD... WE SPENT TOO MUCH MONEY AND I'M MAD"
I also think they spent too much money. What is your point?
12m8keall2c
we're simply not going to spend or grow our way out of this. financial predicament.
kdyam
NotAnAspie
kdyam
NotAnAspie
Happy1
reply to post by NotAnAspie
You people refuse to get it - The US is overwith - we've been sold down the river - by both dems and repubs - the only difference is in your own tiny minds, or you're just stupid.
We are going third world america here - they are going to steal everything you think you're entitled to away from you.
O
It's all gone.
Ummm... Your reply kinda suggests that you did not comprehend any part of what I said because I know the US is crashing. That is exactly what my post was about. My point is that war is not going to fix it (despite what some think) but that is what the gop wants. Obama has been along for the ride on part of that which is very discouraging... however, I think there are some even among them that see it isn't going to work and are second guessing the war plot and thinking about better foreign relations instead. We've sold ourselves too short by too much meddling. War isn't going to fix it... We are better off concentrating on good relations and not the military kind. If we scale back meddling, this will drastically cut the budget. Is that too hard to understand? Then, this would give an opportunity to shore up our own defenses, take care of our own people and make better future foreign deals so that we can still operate as our own free country.
If the gop leads us into large global war that we don't win.... you can kiss that freedom goodbye.
The one's who are most afraid of losing the big US status and are afraid of influence from other leaderships are the same ones willing to gamble it ALL. Throw the whole country on the table and put us all at risk. Genius. Real patriots there.
I'm not sure what is complicated about that... but I'm FULLY aware the US is spread too thin.
You can't see that in my post? Do you have a comprehension problem?
I have no idea what part of that you misunderstood.
I couldn't see it through the fog of your speculation and pure opinion. Please, continue to spread your "ideas" like butter on the doom porn sandwich you seem so eager to make. Oh.. and dont forget to belittle those of us who dont agree with you... that would be careless.. almost as careless as the entitlements and rampant spending Obama has passed to get us where we are today.
How are you even arguing with me if you can't even be clear on what it is you are arguing against?
SO... since I know how to read between the lines I assume that what you are saying is that you are totally comfortable with the part of the rampant spending that is unnecessary and is not even part of the debt.
Is someone coming after your cake? Is a big bad terrorist coming after your piggy bank?
I never once said that spending was not rampant, but that the defense budget is the part that will not be budged... no matter who it hurts. I guess you're cool with that... so go hold up somebody's granny and buy a gun if that makes you feel safe because I don't know what you are bitching about.
You accuse me of doom porn when you are promoting the idea that all is lost because of entitlement and reckless spending. And I'm saying that entitlement would not be as big of a problem if it were not for inflation and the predatory real estate market and general greed... as well as MUCH reckless defense spending.
Then you act like you are arguing with a post that you couldn't read? Brilliant. That's a good use of time.
Go waste somebody else's time unless you have the courage to spit out your real point... or can at least organize it in your own mind.
I think I get it... you got commie fears and think the solution is to starve people or something as if that even makes any sense seeing as how that will cause only more problems. If you want to argue, make a damn argument or something because you are just displaying "I'M MAD... WE SPENT TOO MUCH MONEY AND I'M MAD"
I also think they spent too much money. What is your point?
Yep... i knew you were going to belittle me since i didn't agree with your opinion. I understood what you were saying maybe you couldnt understand my reply, and then you attack me like you are a person whi is going to have thier food stamps cut off.
Nice! Very nice... you proved my point thank you
NotAnAspie
kdyam
NotAnAspie
kdyam
NotAnAspie
Happy1
reply to post by NotAnAspie
You people refuse to get it - The US is overwith - we've been sold down the river - by both dems and repubs - the only difference is in your own tiny minds, or you're just stupid.
We are going third world america here - they are going to steal everything you think you're entitled to away from you.
O
It's all gone.
Ummm... Your reply kinda suggests that you did not comprehend any part of what I said because I know the US is crashing. That is exactly what my post was about. My point is that war is not going to fix it (despite what some think) but that is what the gop wants. Obama has been along for the ride on part of that which is very discouraging... however, I think there are some even among them that see it isn't going to work and are second guessing the war plot and thinking about better foreign relations instead. We've sold ourselves too short by too much meddling. War isn't going to fix it... We are better off concentrating on good relations and not the military kind. If we scale back meddling, this will drastically cut the budget. Is that too hard to understand? Then, this would give an opportunity to shore up our own defenses, take care of our own people and make better future foreign deals so that we can still operate as our own free country.
If the gop leads us into large global war that we don't win.... you can kiss that freedom goodbye.
The one's who are most afraid of losing the big US status and are afraid of influence from other leaderships are the same ones willing to gamble it ALL. Throw the whole country on the table and put us all at risk. Genius. Real patriots there.
I'm not sure what is complicated about that... but I'm FULLY aware the US is spread too thin.
You can't see that in my post? Do you have a comprehension problem?
I have no idea what part of that you misunderstood.
I couldn't see it through the fog of your speculation and pure opinion. Please, continue to spread your "ideas" like butter on the doom porn sandwich you seem so eager to make. Oh.. and dont forget to belittle those of us who dont agree with you... that would be careless.. almost as careless as the entitlements and rampant spending Obama has passed to get us where we are today.
How are you even arguing with me if you can't even be clear on what it is you are arguing against?
SO... since I know how to read between the lines I assume that what you are saying is that you are totally comfortable with the part of the rampant spending that is unnecessary and is not even part of the debt.
Is someone coming after your cake? Is a big bad terrorist coming after your piggy bank?
I never once said that spending was not rampant, but that the defense budget is the part that will not be budged... no matter who it hurts. I guess you're cool with that... so go hold up somebody's granny and buy a gun if that makes you feel safe because I don't know what you are bitching about.
You accuse me of doom porn when you are promoting the idea that all is lost because of entitlement and reckless spending. And I'm saying that entitlement would not be as big of a problem if it were not for inflation and the predatory real estate market and general greed... as well as MUCH reckless defense spending.
Then you act like you are arguing with a post that you couldn't read? Brilliant. That's a good use of time.
Go waste somebody else's time unless you have the courage to spit out your real point... or can at least organize it in your own mind.
I think I get it... you got commie fears and think the solution is to starve people or something as if that even makes any sense seeing as how that will cause only more problems. If you want to argue, make a damn argument or something because you are just displaying "I'M MAD... WE SPENT TOO MUCH MONEY AND I'M MAD"
I also think they spent too much money. What is your point?
Yep... i knew you were going to belittle me since i didn't agree with your opinion. I understood what you were saying maybe you couldnt understand my reply, and then you attack me like you are a person whi is going to have thier food stamps cut off.
Nice! Very nice... you proved my point thank you
The problem is that you are not saying anything substantial to even back up your own bickerings...and that is all that it is. It started with YOUR insults and that is all it has amounted to. All I hear you saying is over and over again is how bad government benefits are like we can just shove the needy and elderly into a big oven somewhere and prove over and over again that you are not equipped to even understand the economy in the first place and don't even know what you are talking about if that is all you got on the subject. That's why all you can do is repeat yourself like a parrot and spout childish insults when you didn't agree with MY opinion when I wasn't even talking to you. Well, I can dish it right back at ya sweetheart.
Knock yourself out, child. Keep telling me how angry you are at name on a screen like I upstaged your prom dress or something. You're not saying anything that even makes sense. Are you lost? You just wanted to strike up a conversation with me and have too many negative feelings about yourself to know how to reply to somebody. What the hell do you want, lol. If you don't want me to pick back...well, you shouldn't have started it. Get back to the topic of the economy because I'm not going to help you with your stunted emotional issues.
Of course I will belittle you after the crap you said to me out the blue... Do you need a road map to connect those two dots? You attacked me, darlin.... What does food stamps have to do with it? maybe it was medicaid or something else, maybe I want healthcare. Wouldn't that make more sense if all you think I'm concerned with are personally centered issues..why foodstamps when foodstamps weren't supposed to be effected by any of this significantly according to the news. See, you don't even make sense. You aren't capable of having mature debate about the economy without spouting names as the first thing you say to someone? What are you, 12?
Now buzz off, you are clearly out of your mind and have emotional issues since it is quite clear you just wanted to start arguing with me. It's funny you hate me though.
Aazadan
The government needs more than it's current revenues in order to operate. If we hit the debt ceiling spending isn't going to stop, and the nation isn't going to default. They're simply going to confiscate the money from peoples bank accounts.