Chemtrails?

page: 15
3
<< 12  13  14   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 16 2013 @ 12:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 


Yeah, they would melt because of the sun, which is also not really there but is a giant lightbulb. Very credible site indeed




posted on Oct, 16 2013 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by UpEndedWorld
 


Still waiting for that proof that anything but jet exhaust is being sprayed. "Look up" doesn't count.


Well if it is, all we need do is look at a few ice cores. Simples


Oh, is there a reason the chemtrailers haven't done that?



posted on Oct, 16 2013 @ 03:10 PM
link   

AndyMayhew

Zaphod58
reply to post by UpEndedWorld
 


Still waiting for that proof that anything but jet exhaust is being sprayed. "Look up" doesn't count.


Well if it is, all we need do is look at a few ice cores. Simples


Oh, is there a reason the chemtrailers haven't done that?


Wouldn't that just indicate levels of pollution overall -- from all sources?



posted on Oct, 16 2013 @ 04:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 

It sure would. And sadly it would show the steady increase, then decrease after EPA regs started to become more stringent. What it would not show is the 1990 immediate increase in aluminum, barium, and strontium that the chemtrail nutters believe so deeply in. Then they would have to claim that "they" somehow go to the lab and fudged the results. Afterall, it's always "them".

Perhaps once or two would take the results and use common sense to bring about the truth. We have had a few small victories here lately. I am even up for Shill of the week! It comes with my own parking spot and a cool badge. I can't wait to show you guys in the lunch room. BTW, is tomorrow meatloaf?
edit on 16-10-2013 by network dude because: Handlers wanted me to fix the spelling.



posted on Oct, 20 2013 @ 06:41 PM
link   
ops wrong thread
edit on 20-10-2013 by exiteternity because: (no reason given)





new topics
 
3
<< 12  13  14   >>

log in

join