It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tusks
There are many things that must be done Collectively for a State to exist--border protection, maintenance of highways and water supplies, police and fire protection, sanitation/sewer services---and money supply/formation.
These do not equate to Collectivism. Collectivism is "State ownership" of the means of production of food & energy, manufacturing, job choice & pay, choice of police officers based on anything the "owners"(read banksters) see fit---and a Police State totalitarianism.
Many uninformed don't understand the differences. This is intentional on the part of the education system.
What you see there is state capitalism. Not socialism.
cap·i·tal·ism noun \ˈka-pə-tə-ˌliz-əm, ˈkap-tə-, British also kə-ˈpi-tə-\
: a way of organizing an economy so that the things that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil, factories, ships, etc.) are owned by individual people and companies rather than by the government
ull Definition of CAPITALISM
: an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.
www.merriam-webster.com...
What you see there is state capitalism. Not socialism.
State ownership of the means of production is by far the most efficient and is inevitably what the future has in store for us, if we survive that long as a species.
" . . . the young men . . . did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense. The strong . . . had not more in division . . . than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors and victuals, clothes, etc . . . thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And the men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it....
For this community of property (so far as it went) was found to breed much confusion and discontentment and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort . . . all being to have alike, and all to do alike . . . if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take off the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them....
"All their victuals were spent . . . no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery. At length . . . the Governor (with the advice of the chiefest among them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves. . . . And so assigned to every family a parcel of land . . . "
This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn, which before would allege weakness and inability, whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.
Christopher Wren, a New York Times correspondent in the Soviet Union and China in the 1970s and 1980s, traveled widely in both countries and observed, at the level of the ordinary citizen, the basic inefficiencies of the system and its inability to satisfy elementary needs, let alone a real measure of freedom. The narrative, skipping back and forth between the U.S.S.R. and China and noting the similarities and contrasts, is anecdotal rather than scholarly, but its vivid and honest reporting provides strong evidence of how the system works and doesn't work.
You seem to be asserting that there is something nefarious that occurs whenever three people make an agreement on a street corner to arrange themselves into a group with shared interests...
It sounds as though you're combatting the idea of confederations and communes and nations and unions, along with all reasonable agreements amidst groups of men. You're refuting the notion of pacts....
This normally works itself out. It's not some nasty unrevisable contract. This is the chosen arrangement of people into political parties and unions and all the rest.
It's not some nasty unrevisable contract. This is the chosen arrangement of people into political parties...
128,168,000 VICTIMS: THE DEKA-MEGAMURDERERS
61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State
35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill
19,178,000 VICTIMS: THE LESSER MEGA-MURDERERS
2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State
1,670,000 Murdered: The Vietnamese War State
1,585,000 Murdered: Poland's Ethnic Cleansing
1,072,000 Murdered: Tito's Slaughterhouse
4,145,000 VICTIMS: SUSPECTED MEGAMURDERERS
1,663,000 Murdered? Orwellian North Korea
Ignoring Elites, Historians Are Missing a Major Factor in Politics and History: Steve Fraser, Gary Gerstel (2005)
... Over the last quarter-century, historians have by and large ceased writing about the role of ruling elites in the country's evolution. Or if they have taken up the subject, they have done so to argue against its salience for grasping the essentials of American political history. Yet there is something peculiar about this recent intellectual aversion, even if we accept as true the beliefs that democracy, social mobility, and economic dynamism have long inhibited the congealing of a ruling stratum. This aversion has coincided, after all, with one of the largest and fastest-growing disparities in the division of income and wealth in American history....Neglecting the powerful had not been characteristic of historical work before World War II....
Tusks
reply to post by crimvelvet
I agree with most of your post except:
"The new system, based on the inherent humans traits- GREED and LAZINESS, worked much better. "
Not Greed and Laziness (sins), but Basic Self Interest(Prudence and Justice-- virtues).
....The body also proves they underwent horrible deaths, if the times turned bad under their reign.
The latest Iron Age bog body dating back to at least 2,000 BC was discovered near Portlaoise in the Irish midlands by an alert bog worker and it bears the same hallmarks of ritual torture that two other famous bodies have.
Ned Kelly, keeper of antiquities at the National Museum of Ireland told the Irish Examiner that a clear pattern has emerged in each case...
crimvelvet
reply to post by Pejeu
What you see there is state capitalism. Not socialism.
I forgot to ask if you know the correct name for " state capitalism"? It is a system where there is ONE corporations entirely OWNED by the government. It is normally called COMMUNISM.
crimvelvetThe world has not seen actual laissez faire capitalism for over one hundred years.
Tusks
reply to post by Pejeu
The most efficient and cost effective ways have nearly always been found by individual initiative--not by collectivist control. Bureaucracies are crippling to free enterprise.
You think Socialism will work with your brains in control--which is exactly what previous failed Socialist State controllers have believed. Unfortunately, the West is headed toward Totalitarianism rapidly--through corporate bankster control of everything of material value.
OpenMindedRealist
reply to post by crimvelvet
Great topic, Greencmp. Orwell once said "We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men” . I don't believe things have gotten any better since.
Thanks to both you and Crim for going through the trouble of correcting/addressing Pejeu. Collectivism by force -- be it known as socialism, communism, progressivism, or happy sharingism -- always preys on the ignorant and weak-minded for support. The best we can hope for is to reach the former by sharing history and truth. The latter, sadly, are the lost causes; they cannot contribute to policy-making any better than a child can.
It had been said before in more eloquent ways by far more respected individuals: Without educated voters, the great experiment in individualism is doomed to fail.
Pejeu
Dude, I'm slaughtering you.
Only people who will read this topic and take away what you want them to take away?
Well, they're way beyond redemption anyway.edit on 2013/10/14 by Pejeu because: (no reason given)
....You have an unfathomably favourable but completely erroneous mental image of what that system was like, for most people....
The speech of Sen. Daniel Webster, during the debate over the reauthorization of the Second National Bank of the U.S. in 1832, summed up much of the American view toward money in general....
“A disordered currency is one of the greatest of evils. It wars against industry, frugality, and economy. And it fosters the evil spirits of extravagance and speculation. Of all the contrivances for cheating the laboring classes of mankind, none has been more effectual than that which deludes them with paper money. This is one of the most effectual of inventions to fertilize the rich man’s field by the sweat of the poor man’s brow. Ordinary tyranny, oppression, excessive taxation: These bear lightly the happiness of the mass of the community, compared with fraudulent currencies and robberies committed with depreciated paper.”
dailyreckoning.com...
I thought about breaking that down into smaller sentences....