It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NowanKenubi
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Would you happen to have links to the work of those benevolent scholars who took upon themselves to correctly translate those Sumerian texts of which you spoke that were fraudulently translated by the inept Zaccaria Sitchin?
Also, were those corrected translation done while he was alive, or once he was dead?
And could you tell me how he managed to have access to texts that no one seemed to think important to translate, especially if he had not the capacity to do so? And why he was let free to act that way for so long without anyone to react?...
------
I think it is clear that our ancestors knew more than what is officially believed actually. The sole remnants of buildings we can't reproduce is eloquent of that.
Arnie123
NowanKenubi
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Would you happen to have links to the work of those benevolent scholars who took upon themselves to correctly translate those Sumerian texts of which you spoke that were fraudulently translated by the inept Zaccaria Sitchin?
Also, were those corrected translation done while he was alive, or once he was dead?
And could you tell me how he managed to have access to texts that no one seemed to think important to translate, especially if he had not the capacity to do so? And why he was let free to act that way for so long without anyone to react?...
------
I think it is clear that our ancestors knew more than what is officially believed actually. The sole remnants of buildings we can't reproduce is eloquent of that.
--
I totally agree. People are quick to dismiss Sitchin. What makes those scholars right? what determines that he was wrong? because they have degrees? Sorry, but my mind is made up, Sitchin had it right all along and with more information coming to light, but sites just as these in south Africa sheds even more light on sitchin.
the moment sitchen gain momentum, the Mainstream science community came in like a flood to denounce his work.
Pfff, mainstream science huh? these are the guys who scoff at just exactly how long man has been on this planet.
This video is truly amazing. I sat and watch the whole 2 hrs. You have to admit, you can't easily dismiss this.
phantomjack
Arnie123
NowanKenubi
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Would you happen to have links to the work of those benevolent scholars who took upon themselves to correctly translate those Sumerian texts of which you spoke that were fraudulently translated by the inept Zaccaria Sitchin?
Also, were those corrected translation done while he was alive, or once he was dead?
And could you tell me how he managed to have access to texts that no one seemed to think important to translate, especially if he had not the capacity to do so? And why he was let free to act that way for so long without anyone to react?...
------
I think it is clear that our ancestors knew more than what is officially believed actually. The sole remnants of buildings we can't reproduce is eloquent of that.
--
I totally agree. People are quick to dismiss Sitchin. What makes those scholars right? what determines that he was wrong? because they have degrees? Sorry, but my mind is made up, Sitchin had it right all along and with more information coming to light, but sites just as these in south Africa sheds even more light on sitchin.
the moment sitchen gain momentum, the Mainstream science community came in like a flood to denounce his work.
Pfff, mainstream science huh? these are the guys who scoff at just exactly how long man has been on this planet.
This video is truly amazing. I sat and watch the whole 2 hrs. You have to admit, you can't easily dismiss this.
I am a scholar and I say Sitchin was dead right. I hereby dismiss any claims made by any other scholar.
Me.
OmegaSynthesis
Is it going to become mainstream that our origin of creation was genetic tampering; enslaved to mine gold?
greyer
OmegaSynthesis
Is it going to become mainstream that our origin of creation was genetic tampering; enslaved to mine gold?
I don't know how easy it is for you to perceive a lie but anything that is totally out of the ordinary like they wanted gold for their atmosphere or government working with aliens, it doesn't mean there is nothing mysterious it just means they want to brainwash you and feed you disinformation, a very small amount of that coming from a truth, in spite of that, there is a truth which could very well be mysterious.
phantomjack
Arnie123
NowanKenubi
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Would you happen to have links to the work of those benevolent scholars who took upon themselves to correctly translate those Sumerian texts of which you spoke that were fraudulently translated by the inept Zaccaria Sitchin?
Also, were those corrected translation done while he was alive, or once he was dead?
And could you tell me how he managed to have access to texts that no one seemed to think important to translate, especially if he had not the capacity to do so? And why he was let free to act that way for so long without anyone to react?...
------
I think it is clear that our ancestors knew more than what is officially believed actually. The sole remnants of buildings we can't reproduce is eloquent of that.
--
I totally agree. People are quick to dismiss Sitchin. What makes those scholars right? what determines that he was wrong? because they have degrees? Sorry, but my mind is made up, Sitchin had it right all along and with more information coming to light, but sites just as these in south Africa sheds even more light on sitchin.
the moment sitchen gain momentum, the Mainstream science community came in like a flood to denounce his work.
Pfff, mainstream science huh? these are the guys who scoff at just exactly how long man has been on this planet.
This video is truly amazing. I sat and watch the whole 2 hrs. You have to admit, you can't easily dismiss this.
I am a scholar and I say Sitchin was dead right. I hereby dismiss any claims made by any other scholar.
Me.
Arnie123
phantomjack
Arnie123
NowanKenubi
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Would you happen to have links to the work of those benevolent scholars who took upon themselves to correctly translate those Sumerian texts of which you spoke that were fraudulently translated by the inept Zaccaria Sitchin?
Also, were those corrected translation done while he was alive, or once he was dead?
And could you tell me how he managed to have access to texts that no one seemed to think important to translate, especially if he had not the capacity to do so? And why he was let free to act that way for so long without anyone to react?...
------
I think it is clear that our ancestors knew more than what is officially believed actually. The sole remnants of buildings we can't reproduce is eloquent of that.
--
I totally agree. People are quick to dismiss Sitchin. What makes those scholars right? what determines that he was wrong? because they have degrees? Sorry, but my mind is made up, Sitchin had it right all along and with more information coming to light, but sites just as these in south Africa sheds even more light on sitchin.
the moment sitchen gain momentum, the Mainstream science community came in like a flood to denounce his work.
Pfff, mainstream science huh? these are the guys who scoff at just exactly how long man has been on this planet.
This video is truly amazing. I sat and watch the whole 2 hrs. You have to admit, you can't easily dismiss this.
I am a scholar and I say Sitchin was dead right. I hereby dismiss any claims made by any other scholar.
Me.
--
You sirs, I applaud you!! Starred!!!
Tardacus
They were capable of interplanetary travel, could build free energy generators from stones but they couldn`t figure out how to build a gold mining machine? That doesn`t make sense to me.
bobs_uruncle
Tardacus
They were capable of interplanetary travel, could build free energy generators from stones but they couldn`t figure out how to build a gold mining machine? That doesn`t make sense to me.
Maybe they were having a government shutdown and budget cuts, you know, like the war of attrition between the bankers with their career zombies in politics and all of us peons? Maybe it is easier to genetically alter a species so that it can do work than make some other form of mechanical or organic machine? You have to admit that human organic robotics are pretty efficient as biological machines, we fuel ourselves, replicate ourselves and are slaves to whatever allows us to fuel ourselves and replicate ourselves.
Cheers - Daveedit on 10/5.2013 by bobs_uruncle because: added al
Hanslune
Arnie123
phantomjack
Arnie123
NowanKenubi
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Would you happen to have links to the work of those benevolent scholars who took upon themselves to correctly translate those Sumerian texts of which you spoke that were fraudulently translated by the inept Zaccaria Sitchin?
Also, were those corrected translation done while he was alive, or once he was dead?
And could you tell me how he managed to have access to texts that no one seemed to think important to translate, especially if he had not the capacity to do so? And why he was let free to act that way for so long without anyone to react?...
------
I think it is clear that our ancestors knew more than what is officially believed actually. The sole remnants of buildings we can't reproduce is eloquent of that.
--
I totally agree. People are quick to dismiss Sitchin. What makes those scholars right? what determines that he was wrong? because they have degrees? Sorry, but my mind is made up, Sitchin had it right all along and with more information coming to light, but sites just as these in south Africa sheds even more light on sitchin.
the moment sitchen gain momentum, the Mainstream science community came in like a flood to denounce his work.
Pfff, mainstream science huh? these are the guys who scoff at just exactly how long man has been on this planet.
This video is truly amazing. I sat and watch the whole 2 hrs. You have to admit, you can't easily dismiss this.
I am a scholar and I say Sitchin was dead right. I hereby dismiss any claims made by any other scholar.
Me.
--
You sirs, I applaud you!! Starred!!!
I dismiss your claim, lol
Why don't you guys go look at the actual documents the Sumerian left. They are all on line - go read them.
Sitchin could not read Sumerian and he didn't even seem to know the difference between the languages of Akkadian and Sumerian. Translations of the material were made well before Sitchin died and in some cases were made before he was born. Sitchin always refused to debate people who could actually read and write the language.
Sitchin simply made up stuff, lots of stuff he was a fiction writer.
Here is a challenge to you who believe in Sitchin: post three things that you have personally researched and verified as true and have evidence of such, which Sitchin stated as true and which is not accepted by the mainstream.
Good luck
When Sitchin made up that aspect of his story he failed to figure out a way to explain why all the greatest gold finds in the world were left untouched by the 'Annie'
randyvs
reply to post by OmegaSynthesis
Oh but God doesn't exist. Therefore your presentation will be scoffed at
because people just can't take the truth.
I am thrilled by your post.
SnFedit on 5-10-2013 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
MysterX
reply to post by Hanslune
When Sitchin made up that aspect of his story he failed to figure out a way to explain why all the greatest gold finds in the world were left untouched by the 'Annie'
You could be right for all i know, but for the point you made above, the easiest explaination of why the best modern era gold finds were all seemingly left alone, is that at one time they were the worst finds of gold to be had, with the previously best deposits having already been mined out by 'you know who'.