10 weapons wont believe are legal to own

TrueBrit
reply to post by firefight

 

I cannot understand some of the reasoning behind including certain weapons on this list. The flame thrower... Yeah sure, I understand that being there, the mini gun, yup, I understand that just fine...

Speargun? Are you kidding me? Totally legitimate way to go fishing if you ask me. Crossbow? It's not as if you cannot hunt with one of these, so what's the problem? And how anyone in the USA can have a problem with a mans weapon like a katana is beyond me. Is there some obsession with getting your kill on from a distance in the USA? Is the NRA just an organisation for cissies who are afraid of getting a little blood on their shirts?

This slideshow was in parts sensible, and in others idiotic.

The funny part is most of those weapons have a level of Darwinism in them... in the user would most like kill/hurt themselves before they would do anything to another.

Xtrozero
It is funny how the hammer kills more people than all of those 10 weapons and ARs combine per year...

Didn't MC Hammer put a hit out on 3rd Bass back in 89?

Hammers do kill people.

Here's something else that kills people.




I gotta be honest.
That video is the first time I ever enjoyed listening to Obama.

My old boss owns a machine gun and a rocket launcher. My cousin owns a cannon and fully auto weapons. With the right license yeah you can own anything you want including a M2 browning if that floats your boat. Its called chain of custody.

The article neglected to mention my thunder-thighs of steel and my bulging biceps of doom. You can hire them where legal, for discrete mayhem.