Conservatives Appropriating Eachother's Stupidity: People Boycotting Barilla After CEO's Anti-Gay Statements
Please note there are about 125 Billion Flying F's I could not give about your opinion on the actual topic of the article, this thread is to
discuss group behaviour and people encouraging collective un-education and social appropriation of bad behaviour in other topics if possible.
Okay so for anyone who hasn't heard, The CEO of Barilla said:
I would never do (a commercial) with a homosexual family, not for lack of respect but because we don't agree with them.
...
(If gay people) like our pasta and our advertising, they'll eat our pasta, if they don't like it then they will not eat it and they will eat another
brand.
It doesn't generally offend me at all, but I do reserve the opinion that this man is part of a faction of idiots who will die off along with the rest
of the Baby Boomers, making the world that much closer to being a place where people who have opinions that don't matter at all just won't be spoken
at all. After this was said, a bunch of people (most of whom are not gay, I might add) are boycotting Barilla. This isn't really what I want to
discuss, though.
The problem I have, actually, is with the idiots. The idiots who get mad about people boycotting and say wonderously, awe-inspiringly idiotic things
like this, and get the support of hundreds of people and not nearly enough criticism:
If you dont like Barilla's opinion, go eat another type of pasta. Geesh! You gays think the world owes you something!
^ This person got 328 likes and 18 dislikes for saying that people should stop boycotting and just.... boycott instead... because the world owes you
nothing?
I mean seriously? It's one thing for one person to say it but then to get the support of all of these others? So why is it that people appropriate
other peoples' stupidity just because they appear to be in the same faction? I don't see this kind behaviour happening as much on the Left as I do on
the Right, I might add, although I wouldn't officially claim to subscribe to either end of the spectrum.
Source
This is the source and it's not hard to tell on arrival that it's dominated by conservatives. People will sit on this site for hours upon hours just
repeating the same rhetoric that they hear on the television or from their Elmer Granty broadcast stations. Does noboy think for themselves anymore?
Or do we really just read from a script and pat eachother on the back when we get the lines right?
It embarasses me to be a human being when I read some of these comments and replies on the Yahoo site, and how much support they get from eachother
for saying such stupi things. I really wish people weren't so apt to be so Black & White.
Here's someone's reply to the afformentioned comment:
I'm straight and I won't be buying Barilla's pasta...thanks for the suggestion!
This reply got 6 likes and 24 dislikes. It seems like everyone just loves to hate on anyone who accepts gay people on conservative-dominated sites and
anyone who goes against the gays get volleys of up-votes. This example shows someone who supports gays doing exactly what the person who doesn't
support gays asks him to do, and he gets downvote hard for it jsut because he says he's on the side of the gays while doing it.
The hypocrisy is obvious.
I'm posting this because I find this actually happens quite a bit on this site as well, and I hope people can realize how childish and absolutely
retarded it can make people on certain sides of the argument look.
I'd like someone to show me some examples of the Liberal side oing similar things to get that perspective as well -- an example where people get a
huge amount of stars or up-votes on a different site for something that is "Dictionary stupid", plain as day.
Please note there are about 125 Billion Flying F's I could not give about your opinion on the actual topic of the article, this thread is to
discuss group behaviour and people encouraging collective un-education and social appropriation of bad behaviour in other topics if
possible.edit on 1-10-2013 by LightOrange because: (no reason given)