reply to post by Phage
The artifact in the OPs pic does look more interesting than those on your pic.
Definitely could be the same thing, but theres no other similar marks on the first pic so its still pretty interesting.
Of course, I suppose it's reasonable that the astronaut would not have centered a UFO in the image, right?
reply to post by HooHaa
The dirt is on the film which was processed in 1966 and much more recently scanned.