Long UFO Seen

page: 1
3

log in

join

posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 02:20 PM
link   
Image :
tothemoon.ser.asu.edu...

Left Above corner do with Zoom.


Someone lost there gun there maybe or its a flying bird there..right?(NASA will say
)
Some people its a pixel error.
Decide yourself.




posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 02:25 PM
link   
Well considering there appear to be other anomalies, or blots in this image I think its safe to conclude that this is part of that, not something out of the ordinary.

Just a guess however.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by HiddenSecrets
 


Or just a piece of junk floating around?
It does look long though, I'll give you that



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 02:30 PM
link   
reply to post by HiddenSecrets
 


Probably space junk ...

Or ET



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 02:34 PM
link   
reply to post by HiddenSecrets
 


Looks like dirt on the scanned film to me. Here's another from the same series.
tothemoon.ser.asu.edu...



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


The artifact in the OPs pic does look more interesting than those on your pic.

Definitely could be the same thing, but theres no other similar marks on the first pic so its still pretty interesting.

nice find



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 03:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Biigs
 

Please don't use the "it doesn't look the same" argument. It's dirt. Different specks of dirt look different.
tothemoon.ser.asu.edu...
Of course, I suppose it's reasonable that the astronaut would not have centered a UFO in the image, right?



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Biigs
reply to post by Phage
 


The artifact in the OPs pic does look more interesting than those on your pic.

Definitely could be the same thing, but theres no other similar marks on the first pic so its still pretty interesting.

nice find


There are other similar marks in the first pic, but they are smaller. Look for them and you will find them. That one stands out in part because of the size but also in part because of what is behind it. This could easily be dirt, dust, or another artifact related to the photo itself.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 04:55 PM
link   
looks like some shot of the black knight satellite from another perspective



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 






Of course, I suppose it's reasonable that the astronaut would not have centered a UFO in the image, right?


Not if he wanted to get the picture, but still leave enough questions that some people will say it is "dirt".

My opinion is space junk...
edit on 9/29/2013 by VeniVidi because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 06:24 PM
link   
Looks like FOD (foreign object debris) on the scan to me.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 06:25 PM
link   
I haven't a clue as to what that may be.. What amazes me is how all this dirt finds its way into space faring camera lenses.. These are assembled in specially designed clean rooms are they not?

www.wral.com...

Some ones heads gonna roll for this multimillion dollar fudge up..



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


How can you say that it is a dirt?(Your link)



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 10:51 PM
link   
reply to post by HooHaa
 

The dirt is on the film which was processed in 1966 and much more recently scanned.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 10:53 PM
link   
reply to post by HiddenSecrets
 

Because it is. Like the dirt on this image.
tothemoon.ser.asu.edu...

Question: Have you ever used a scanner to scan photographic film?

edit on 9/29/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 11:47 PM
link   

gortex



There's my hole puncher!
edit on 29-9-2013 by AbleEndangered because: added pic



posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 03:39 AM
link   

Phage
reply to post by HooHaa
 

The dirt is on the film which was processed in 1966 and much more recently scanned.


^ This.

It's quite clearly a roll of film - you can see the next exposure in the film at the bottom.

The 'object' is nowhere to be seen in the next frame




posted on Sep, 30 2013 @ 03:40 AM
link   

onebigmonkey

It's quite clearly a roll of film - you can see the next exposure in the film at the bottom.


It's also from Gemini 12. That's the "G12" in the file name.
No digital cameras in 1966.
edit on 9/30/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)





top topics
 
3

log in

join