It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
enament
Please everyone participating in this thread be CIVIL and well manured and please refrain from making sexist remarks.
Logical discussion is impossible when tempers are heated, so go for a walk or count to ten if you are angry and really think about what you intend to say.
It is a heated debate I know but respect others for their different opinions on the subject and be diplomatic. Being different and unique is what makes us who we are, if we were all the same what a boring world it would be.
LewsTherinThelamon
reply to post by ParasuvO
There are acceptable forms of self-mutilation and "non-acceptable" forms.
Go into any mall and count the number of girls getting their ears pierced at a very young ages because "women are supposed to have pierced ears."
But, God forbid, that same girl get a tattoo.
I should take my two-year-old daughter in to get a tattoo, the same way parents do with ear piercings.
enament
Darkphoenix77
I still haven't said anything like what you are saying I did give a direct quote. I have said nothing even close to"women who had tattoos are more for a "one nighter" or words to that effect... ie promiscuous." What you said there. And not even in anything I edited, you are full of it! Quit making stuff up unless you can quote me directly. Your comments are defamatory seriously.
From page 1
Ahh yes the "tramp stamp" I forgot to mention that term.I won't touch upon that though,I don't want to offend any one here.
This statement says you "forgot to mention the term" i.e. you meant to make reference to it.
"won't touch upon it though, I don't want to offend anyone on here." i.e. agreement on usage of the derogatory nature of the term, however does not want to deal with the fallout from the people inevitably upset at your belief concerning the term.
I will give you credit for being more civil than some in agreement with your thread, but you don't exactly call the ones out that are being more blatant in their views on women with tattoos which implies (rightfully or wrongfully) that you agree with them.
edit on 3-10-2013 by Darkphoenix77 because: clarification
So you make me guilty based on something I could have said. And also making me guilty because I didn't want to get involved with or be associated with someone having said something derogatory. Since I have noticed that people around here make stuff up when they have nothing on you.
All I was going to do was define the term "Tramp stamp" but did not want to offend one who has such a tattoo. The lower back tattoo as I refer to it out of respect.About 70% of the time I do find it attractive. but it is one of very few I do like. That tattoo is also being very much over done these days.
I expect from you a formal apology based on the fact you made up what you originally said and then back peddled when I exposed you for defaming me, and then looked for anything you could get me on,and then made assumptions on what you THINK I was going to say. You cannot imagine what you think someone is going to say and then make them guilty based on that. Man I sure am glad you aren't a judge because people are not found guilty based on things you think they are going to do or say.
amraks
This is like tagging over the artist banksy masterpieces.
Your body is the master piece girls, tattoo's are ruining it's natural beauty ..
I have recently became single,and I am noticing it is getting very difficult to find a woman that isn't covered with the damn things. I don't mind one or two feminine looking small well placed ones, but now it seems most women have them
sapien82
amraks
This is like tagging over the artist banksy masterpieces.
Your body is the master piece girls, tattoo's are ruining it's natural beauty ..
banksy is #e though !
all of his stuff deserves to be painted over , the guy is a hypocrite