It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
awake1234
reply to post by OneManArmy
OneManArmy,
nice work defending your beliefs, but honestly and quite literally it will take more than a one man army on this site to debate the collective who don arrogance and sarcasm like new clothes...and this is not directed at anyone in particular, just a certain spirit of the times if you will.
this is really an argument of belief, which is predicated upon evidence (usually), which is subject to question - regardless of whether the line of reasoning promoting the questioning is rational in the first place.
so coming to a thread of this kind and presenting evidence in its support, is basically like pointing to yourself and telling the tiger where to bite!
so it must be treated as such - a statement - not an answer...because in all likelihood, if this is a true event, its astronomically improbable that anyone on this site, qualified or un, has the resources or experience to access anything remotely passible for evidence.
as it cant be proved, ironically making space for a vague potentiality, it cant be disproved, and so the posts continue...
we all have beliefs to defend, and in a sense, are each a one man army, but beliefs here have changed over the years and in that potentiality many beliefs have gotten lost between mysticism and skepticism, forgetting that truth is found in neither...yet few retained their innocent curiosity.
Thanks
LOVE
qualified or un, has the resources or experience to access anything remotely passible for evidence.
I thought a conspiracy theory was just that.. "a theory" until its proven to be a conspiracy or its proven to be unfounded.
I thought a conspiracy theory was just that.. "a theory" until its proven to be a conspiracy or its proven to be unfounded.
Sometimes its a good idea to look at the world with the eyes of a child, complete ignorance and innocent wonder, thats where some of the most profound questions can come from.
How do you propose the "chemtrail" theory be proven to be unfounded?
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by OneManArmy
I thought a conspiracy theory was just that.. "a theory" until its proven to be a conspiracy or its proven to be unfounded.
And how long is it supposed to take once a conspiracy theory has been proven unfounded, which btw has happened many many years ago when it comes to chemtrails?
Zaphod58
reply to post by OneManArmy
Because as we have said repeatedly, the possibility is real, even if the evidence falls on its face every time.
Besides that is for deliberate hoaxes (banning).
network dude
Zaphod58
reply to post by OneManArmy
Because as we have said repeatedly, the possibility is real, even if the evidence falls on its face every time.
Besides that is for deliberate hoaxes (banning).
Exactly! We all admit it could happen, probably not where it could be seen. If I wanted to poison the populace, I would do it below 28000 feet. But since the chemtrail crowd refuses to comprehend that contrails make the most scientific sense in what everyone sees, they completely disregard the facts in favor of the fantasy angle. Like pining for Bigfoot. It would be amazing if real, but all the evidence points to no. And I think Bigfoot has 100% chance of being real when compared to chemtrails.
If the chemtrail crowd acknowledged the science, then any anomalies might have a chance of being noticed. After all, who better to spot a possible issue than one who is actively looking AND understands what he is looking at.
OneManArmy
As for today, it was all in the news they have the DNA of bigfoot. Timely announcement.
network dude
OneManArmy
As for today, it was all in the news they have the DNA of bigfoot. Timely announcement.
And I remember when some guys from Georgia had a body. Until I see the hairy guy himself, I think I will stay with the "maybe" camp.
I wish everyone in the chemtrail threads would think with some common sense in stead of acting as if we were stealing their religious beliefs when disagreeing. Thanks for the post.
OneManArmy
network dude
Zaphod58
reply to post by OneManArmy
Because as we have said repeatedly, the possibility is real, even if the evidence falls on its face every time.
Besides that is for deliberate hoaxes (banning).
Exactly! We all admit it could happen, probably not where it could be seen. If I wanted to poison the populace, I would do it below 28000 feet. But since the chemtrail crowd refuses to comprehend that contrails make the most scientific sense in what everyone sees, they completely disregard the facts in favor of the fantasy angle. Like pining for Bigfoot. It would be amazing if real, but all the evidence points to no. And I think Bigfoot has 100% chance of being real when compared to chemtrails.
If the chemtrail crowd acknowledged the science, then any anomalies might have a chance of being noticed. After all, who better to spot a possible issue than one who is actively looking AND understands what he is looking at.
Then technically we are in agreement.
I have never claimed to have proof of chemtrails. Just motive and a previous examples of testing stuff on people and in the atmosphere. You only have to look at the quality of food these days to see they really dont care about our health and welfare.
They dont "need" to dump anything in the upper reaches of the atmosphere to kill us, they do it with the food and "medicines" we administer to ourselves. And then charge us again to "make us better" when the food and drugs take their toll, so we can poison ourselves some more.
As for today, it was all in the news they have the DNA of bigfoot. Timely announcement.
I haven't seen any trails since the shut down