Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

"God" says 9.7 Earthquake Coming to West Coast USA on Oct 3, 2013

page: 2
28
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 08:45 AM
link   
reply to post by FlyersFan
 


INDEED.

And I don't know.

Lots of plausible options as you outlined well.

It DOES FEEL LIKE, APPEAR LIKE . . . that coming weeks and months will see a SIGNIFICANT escalation in END TIMES EVENTS of all types . . . including quakes and volcanoes. To what degree and frequency remains to be seen.

Just the traitorousness in D.C. has escalated quite more than any nightmare would care to entertain.




posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 08:51 AM
link   
reply to post by BO XIAN
 


That would be true if the relevant verse could be proved to have been written BEFORE the alleged event. That's kinda a prerequisite. It's pretty easy to write a story hundreds of years later and have all sorts of details.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 08:55 AM
link   
reply to post by jtma508
 


A sizeable number of verses qualify.

Isaiah 53 comes to mind.

Daniel 9 etc. comes to mind.

Josh McDowell's THE NEW EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT is good . . .

as well as his MORE THAN A CARPENTER

and Lee Strobel's THE CASE FOR THE REAL JESUS is excellent.

Solid prophetic examples abound in Scripture and in the modern era.

There IS a LOT of noise on the channel. One has to filter well.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 08:57 AM
link   
This deserves to be watched carefully...... Watch out for preliminary major events around 2 to 3 days before Thursday, October 3 2013.....which would be sometime around September 30 2013-October 1 2013..... If there is a preliminary major event a few days before the 3rd of October, then that should be more than enough warning for a possible earthquake of this size on the 3rd.....



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:04 AM
link   
Would'nt a 9.3 earthquake be a whole earth shaking event? Is a 9.3 even possible?



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:09 AM
link   

proob4
Would'nt a 9.3 earthquake be a whole earth shaking event? Is a 9.3 even possible?


The December 2004 Andaman Islands Earthquake was a 9.3 magnitude quake, while back in 1960s, there was a 9.5 quake at Chile.....Therefore, a 9.7 earthquake would be 2.2 times stronger than the 9.5 at Chile which happened in 1960......



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:09 AM
link   

proob4
Would'nt a 9.3 earthquake be a whole earth shaking event? Is a 9.3 even possible?

If a 9.3 hit California, I'm sure a LOT of the West would feel it. And considering the Tsunami effects that could happen .. depending on which direction a Tsunami went, it could finish off Fukishima in Japan ... and nail Hawaii ... etc etc

And I'd say that yes, a 9.3 is entirely possible. Any size is possible. The list of largest world earthquakes since 1900 show that there was a 9.5 in Chile and a 9.2 in Alaska. And that's just in the past 100 years or so. So yes it can, AND DOES, happen.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:14 AM
link   
The strongest earthquake recorded so far on the moment magnitude scale was the 9.5 Magnitude earthquake at Valdivia, Chile, which happened on 22 May 1960.... Info below:

en.wikipedia.org...

"The 1960 Valdivia earthquake or Great Chilean Earthquake (Spanish: Terremoto de Valdivia/Gran terremoto de Chile) of Sunday, 22 May 1960 was the most powerful earthquake ever recorded, rating 9.5 on the moment magnitude scale. It occurred in the afternoon (19:11 GMT, 15:11 local time) and its resulting tsunami affected southern Chile, Hawaii, Japan, the Philippines, eastern New Zealand, southeast Australia, and the Aleutian Islands in Alaska.
The epicenter was near Lumaco (see map), approximately 570 kilometres (350 mi) south of Santiago, with Temuco being the closest large city, while Valdivia was the most affected city. The tremor caused localised tsunamis that severely battered the Chilean coast, with waves up to 25 metres (82 ft). The main tsunami raced across the Pacific Ocean and devastated Hilo, Hawaii. Waves as high as 10.7 metres (35 ft) were recorded 10,000 kilometres (6,200 mi) from the epicenter, and as far away as Japan and the Philippines."

Me: So a 9.7 earthquake could cause tsunami even higher than the 9.5, possible above 30 metres!



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:15 AM
link   
thank you Flyersfan for the chuckle,.
Seems to me there has not been a single prediction that of which has come to be valid.
or anything from a prophetic vision.

also seems that most if not all of those from the religious group that make such prediction
like sir camping are simply delusional.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:19 AM
link   
Who would feel a 9.3 in California??

What Would Happen if a Japan Sized Earthquake (9.0) Hit California

Earthquake at South Pole can be Registered at North Pole 30 minutes later

How Far do Seismic Waves Travel in an Average Earthquake

The five pointer on the East Cost a few years back was felt all the way up into Canada and down to Georgia. It originated in Virginia. But the East Coast has different kinds of rock formation underground than the West Coast. So I don't know if you can judge by that. Our rock base shakes easier and carries the earthquake farther than the West Coast rock base.

Earthquake Info for California - based on a 10.5

There are two types of tectonic plate boundaries along the West Coast of the U.S. and Canada. The San Andreas fault forms a plate boundary where the plates scrape along each other (a transform boundary) from the Imperial Valley in the south to Cape Mendocino in the north. North of Cape Mendocino, the oceanic plate is subducted or pushed under the continental plate along a plate boundary running parallel to and off the Northern California coast all the way to Aleutian Islands of Alaska. Although big earthquakes can occur along each of these plate boundaries, even if both of these boundaries ruptured at once – so unlikely as to almost be impossible -- it wouldn't be enough to produce a magnitude 10.5 earthquake.

Based on information gathered from the world's largest earthquakes, it would take a rupture 6,000 miles long along a subduction boundary to produce a magnitude 10.5 earthquake. That would be a rupture from the North Pole to the Equator, and that type and size boundary doesn't exist.

Though very large earthquakes can still occur in California – a fact that should not be ignored -- an earthquake of the magnitude presented in the miniseries is impossible. The potential for a magnitude 10.5 earthquake should be categorized as pure science fiction.


If it would take a 6,000 mile rupture to make a 10.5 ... I'm thinking it would take a very large rupture for a 9.3 as well ... and it doesn't seem likely (unless we get hit by an asteroid or something) and if that happens, a 9.3 in California will be the least of the worlds problems.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:34 AM
link   
I agree with everything you said, except..



not anyone who claims visions from God really gets them.


Had to fix that.

It's funny to watch the different factions get themselves all into a tizzy over purported doom, be them the religious folk, the ufo crowd, the general conspiracy crowd, etc. The phenomenon of web-based mass hysteria is an interesting thing to watch..



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:47 AM
link   

FlyersFan
Who would feel a 9.3 in California??

What Would Happen if a Japan Sized Earthquake (9.0) Hit California

Earthquake at South Pole can be Registered at North Pole 30 minutes later

How Far do Seismic Waves Travel in an Average Earthquake

The five pointer on the East Cost a few years back was felt all the way up into Canada and down to Georgia. It originated in Virginia. But the East Coast has different kinds of rock formation underground than the West Coast. So I don't know if you can judge by that. Our rock base shakes easier and carries the earthquake farther than the West Coast rock base.

Earthquake Info for California - based on a 10.5

There are two types of tectonic plate boundaries along the West Coast of the U.S. and Canada. The San Andreas fault forms a plate boundary where the plates scrape along each other (a transform boundary) from the Imperial Valley in the south to Cape Mendocino in the north. North of Cape Mendocino, the oceanic plate is subducted or pushed under the continental plate along a plate boundary running parallel to and off the Northern California coast all the way to Aleutian Islands of Alaska. Although big earthquakes can occur along each of these plate boundaries, even if both of these boundaries ruptured at once – so unlikely as to almost be impossible -- it wouldn't be enough to produce a magnitude 10.5 earthquake.

Based on information gathered from the world's largest earthquakes, it would take a rupture 6,000 miles long along a subduction boundary to produce a magnitude 10.5 earthquake. That would be a rupture from the North Pole to the Equator, and that type and size boundary doesn't exist.

Though very large earthquakes can still occur in California – a fact that should not be ignored -- an earthquake of the magnitude presented in the miniseries is impossible. The potential for a magnitude 10.5 earthquake should be categorized as pure science fiction.


If it would take a 6,000 mile rupture to make a 10.5 ... I'm thinking it would take a very large rupture for a 9.3 as well ... and it doesn't seem likely (unless we get hit by an asteroid or something) and if that happens, a 9.3 in California will be the least of the worlds problems.




I think everyone is forgetting depth of the quake matters more than anything. If it a very deep quake it might not be that bad. I was in the 6.8 in Tacoma Washington in 2001. It was a very deep quake and very little damage was really done. If that had been closer to the surface it would have been devastating.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 09:52 AM
link   
Hey, just figured I'd add a little something. There is a little blog I follow from a man named Eric Leigh-Pink who makes predictions often. He also has mentioned a tsunami on the west coast, a bad hurricane that's supposed to hit sometime in Oct here in FL and I believe volcanic eruptions.

Not saying I believe all this will happen but it's interesting to follow at least! I'm definitely praying none of those things happen.

Here is his blog if anyone is interested in reading it:

worldpredictions.wordpress.com...



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 10:15 AM
link   
But all the "help" will be over on the East Coast



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 10:21 AM
link   
either a lot of senitive people are jumping on the bandwagon or else there's a bunch of guesswork at play


one of the reported visionaries had this big quake & tsunami on west coast even before the Japan precurser event of 2011.... now he's saying that we are close to his visionary prediction date here in 3 Oct 2013...
did the reporters dig him up or did this guy come forward to toot his horn on being the First to call for the quake-tsunami

in the article bottom... theres a list of links for those interested, as follows:

Related Posts:

Cindy Page: California Earthquake Coming in October 2013
Chuck Pierce: The Shakings Begin in San Francisco This Year
Bob Jones: Earthquake to Hit California
Major Earthquake Coming to the Heartland of America
Prophetic Warning: Major West Coast Earthquake is Coming…
Wendy Alec: Judgment of God Coming to San Francisco and…
Earthquake and Tsunami are Coming to Maine
Destruction Coming to New York City
Bob Jones: Warning to America, Do Not Put Pressure on Israel
Meteorites Are Falling All Across the United States and…



What has taken the back page is last weeks re-newed warning of a East Coast Tsunami that results from 1/4 of a volcanic Island sliding into the Atlantic,
SEE Canary Mega-Tsunami to hit east coast USA:

www.youtube.com...



i guess this episode fits into the '15 minutes of fame" paradigm and is deftly tossed aside as a new gloom-&-porn-doom event draws neigh
edit on 29-9-2013 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 10:51 AM
link   
the san andreas' largest earth quakes are in the very low 8's. an earth quake close to that size would occur on the cascadia subduction fault. it is the same type of fault that caused indonesia's giant quake in 2004. the last time this fault let loos was in 1701, so it is due.

then there is the new madrid fault in the middle of the united states. this is the most potentially dangerous fault in our country due to the fact that most of the buildings in the heart land were built with no thought of earth quakes in mind. this fault let loose in dec. of 1810, jan. 1811 and feb. 1811 with three quakes estimated at 8.1 or so.

interesting side note on the new madrid. the first steam ship to navigate the mississippi river, s.s. new orleans, was on the river on its maiden cruise, being attacked by indians in a canoe when the first quake hit.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 10:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Menedes567
 


Thanks for that info.

There's a lot of 'noise' about the Canary Islands tsunami potential. There's loud, strident pontifications on both sides of the issue.

It's a bit hard for a layman to know where the truth lies . . . as though the geologists and seismologists DO! LOL.

We ALL see through the glass darkly.

It appears to me, from your posted info from Wiki . . . that the 'alarmists' re the Canary islands potential are likely to be MORE correct than the naysayers.

I say that for a couple or so reasons . . .

1. I believe that generally . . . the MOST ALARMIST folks in this era . . . when the dust settles . . . will turn out to have been frightfully conservative and minimalist. I say that because The Book declares that this era will be worse than the world has EVER known and worse than ever will be again in the history future of the planet. I believe that is EMPHATICALLY true.

2. Humans are soooooooo . . . well, particularly bishops and priests of the religion of scientism . . . are sooooo ARROGANT as to think that they have it 'ALL FIGURED OUT' or MOSTLY ALL FIGURED OUT. They have been proven wrong time and time again. It appears that God almost DELIGHTS in proving them ignorant & wrong.

3. The Sumatra quake . . . IIRC, the undersea pics taken afterwards discovered a SUDDENLY NEW UNDERSEA CLIFF that was created virtually instantly, 100-300 or so feet tall!!!, IIRC. The scientists were shocked. They declared that they'd believed such an even to be TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Right. Unh hunh! Heard THAT before! I believe that's just a hint of the SHOCKS coming for the experts and the rest of us.

That's one reason I believe that the prognostications about the impossibility of a 10.X+ quake to be so much farting out both ends of the experts.

If I understand their blather correctly, they are saying that the whole of the San Andreas fault would have to rupture horribly for that magnitude to be reached. Trouble is, That's ASSUMING that THEY KNOW what they are talking about. I don't think they do. Their GUESStimates are maybe slightly more informed and "expert" than those of the rest of us. That's about all.

What if there are several other dynamics unknown to them which could result in that? Even if there's only one or two additional dynamics . . . and synergistic effects of different dynamics contributing additively together toward a greater magnitude??? They aren't even thinking in such directions, evidently, because they've disallowed other possibilities by definition. Some "scientific" folks used to disallow a spherical earth, by definition, too.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 11:04 AM
link   
So, if this doesn't happen the either "God" is a fraudster or "God" is a Scamster or "God" is simply ignorant, stupid and not quite as good as his many millions of followers say.

QED

We will see.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 11:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Lil Drummerboy
 


Camping was off the wall and I told him essentially that to his face more than 40 years ago.

HOWEVER, Some prophetic sources have been accurate.

Pastor David Wilkerson was quite accurate over a few decades. Some of his predictions are still to be fulfilled. Some were already.

I think the Christian prophetic field is a mess. However, I'm convinced God will be cleaning it up and that there will be some prophetic sources in coming months, years who will speak very specifically in terms of literal events and degrees of trauma and specific dates and even hours--all fulfilled to the letter. Then there's the Biblical TWO WITNESSES who will certainly be 100% accurate.

In addition, occultic prophetic sources will be shown to be grossly flawed, at best.

Those who wish to be chronic naysayers will eventually have to shut up or be laughed to scorn as they now laugh others to scorn.

I don't know when that state of affairs will arrive but I have 0.00000% doubt it will.



.



posted on Sep, 29 2013 @ 11:38 AM
link   

redtic


not anyone who claims visions from God really gets them.


Had to fix that.


OH REALLY?

Evidently you haven't read a number of documented prophetic assertions and their fulfillments. I'll list some below. There are some others from modern sources I'll try and post in a later post.

I love the HEAVEN IS FOR REAL case because the 4 year old little boy COULD NOT HAVE KNOWN some of the things God showed him in Heaven.

I realize that many folks have staked their rebellions, idolatries, willfulness etc. on THERE BEING NO POSSIBILITY in their construction on reality . . . to God . . . to prophecy . . . to God being concerned about their details of life etc.

That's a sad state.

I do not know if the 3 Christians with dreams predicting the same thing on the same date will prove true, or not.

I do know that I've never read such a case in my 45 years of studying prophecy, particularly Christian, Biblical prophecy.

1. They could be 100% right.

2. They could be mistaken in their hearing.

3. They could be victims of some government black-ops technology insertions into their minds. We DO DEFINITELY have the capacity to do that currently and have had for a long time.

4. They could be deluded by occult demonic forces.

5. They could have set themselves up by dwelling on such topics overmuch the day before.

To me, the OCKHAM'S RAZOR indicator would rest on #1.

Other prophetic discussions as background to the assertions from the 3 dreams:

ANCIENT PROPHECIES REVEALED: 500 PROPHECIES LISTED IN ORDER OF WHEN THEY WERE FULFILLED:

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_10?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1380471442&sr=1-10&keywords=CHRISTIAN +PROPHECY



This book shows over 500 biblical prophecies in the order of when they were fulfilled. These include pre-flood times though the first Coming of Jesus and into the Middle Ages. The heart of this book is the 53 prophecies fulfilled between 1948 and 2008. The last 11 prophecies between 2008 and the Tribulation are also given


THE PROPHECY ANSWER BOOK DR DAVID JEREMIAH:

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_15?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1380471740&sr=1-15&keywords=CHRISTIAN+PROPHECY

END TIMS: UNDERSTANDING TODAY’S WORLD EVENTS IN BIBLICAL PROPHECY


www.amazon.com...=sr_1_16?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1380471740&sr=1-16&keywords=CHRISTIAN+PR OPHECY



Looking around at all the chaos and confusion of modern life, people today are wondering if we have not already entered the end times God predicted. In response, Dr. Walvood offers practical and logical answers for today from God's Word, drawing upon prophetic passages and outlining for us the major events of end times teachings. His writing style is clear, straightforward, and easily understood.




MARY BAXTER BOOKS:

A DIVINE REVELATION OF HELL:

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380471069&sr=8-1&keywords=mary++Baxter

A DIVINE REVELATION OF HEAVEN:

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1380471069&sr=8-2&keywords=mary++Baxter

A DIVINE REVELATION OF ANGELS

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1380471069&sr=8-9&keywords=mary++Baxter


HEAVEN IS FOR REAL: A LITTLE BOY’S ASTOUNDING STORY OF HIS TRIP TO HEAVEN AND BACK:

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380471321&sr=8-1&keywords=TODD+BURPO

THE HARBINGER: THE ANCIENT MYSTERY THAT HOLDS THE SECRET OF AMERICA’S FUTURE

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_9?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1380471442&sr=1-9&keywords=CHRISTIAN+PROP HECY






top topics



 
28
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join