It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is general consensus that supermassive black holes exist in the centers of most galaxies.
A black hole is an object — typically a collapsed star — whose gravity is so strong that its escape velocity exceeds the speed of light. Since nothing is known to exceed the speed of light, nothing can escape from a black hole.
5. Is a black hole a giant cosmic vacuum cleaner? The answer to this question is "not really."Mathematically, the gravity of any spherical object behaves as if all the mass were concentrated at one central point. Since most ordinary objects have surfaces, you will feel the strongest gravity of an object when you are on its surface. This is as close to its total mass as you can get. If you penetrated a spherical object with a constant mass density, getting closer to its core, you would feel the force of gravity get weaker, not stronger.
3. Since light has no mass how can it be trapped by the gravitational pull of a black hole? Newton thought that only objects with mass could produce a gravitational force on each other. Applying Newton's theory of gravity, one would conclude that since light has no mass, the force of gravity couldn't affect it. Einstein discovered that the situation is a bit more complicated than that. First he discovered that gravity is produced by a curved space-time. Then Einstein theorized that the mass and radius of an object (its compactness) actually curves space-time. Mass is linked to space in a way that physicists today still do not completely understand. However, we know that the stronger the gravitational field of an object, the more the space around the object is curved. In other words, straight lines are no longer straight if exposed to a strong gravitational field; instead, they are curved. Since light ordinarily travels on a straight-line path, light follows a curved path if it passes through a strong gravitational field. This is what is meant by "curved space," and this is why light becomes trapped in a black hole. In the 1920's Sir Arthur Eddington proved Einstein's theory when he observed starlight curve when it traveled close to the Sun. This was the first successful prediction of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. One way to picture this effect of gravity is to imagine a piece of rubber sheeting stretched out. Imagine that you put a heavy ball in the center of the sheet. The weight of the ball will bend the surface of the sheet close to it. This is a two-dimensional picture of what gravity does to space in three dimensions. Now take a little marble and send it rolling from one side of the rubber sheet to the other. Instead of the marble taking a straight path to the other side of the sheet, it will follow the contour of the sheet that is curved by the weight of the ball in the center. This is similar to how the gravitation field created by an object (the ball) affects light (the marble).
A black hole is an object — typically a collapsed star — whose gravity is so strong that its escape velocity exceeds the speed of light. Since nothing is known to exceed the speed of light, nothing can escape from a black hole.
Does that indicate that an object within the gravity would be pulled faster than the speed of light? If not why not?
And If so, then FTL is possible.
The information paradox first surfaced in the early 1970s when Hawking, building on earlier work by Jacob Bekenstein at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, suggested that black holes are not totally black. He showed that particle–antiparticle pairs generated at a black hole’s periphery, known as its event horizon, would be separated. One would fall into the black hole while the other would escape, making the black hole appear as a radiating body.
Quantum entanglement demands that the trapped particle would have negative energy and, because of Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence E = mc2, negative mass. With each successive negative-energy particle the black hole would therefore steadily lose mass or “evaporate”. Hawking argued that even after a black hole has totally evaporated it would leave behind its central, infinitely dense point known as the singularity, in which information would be lost forever.
The significance of the information paradox came to a head in 1997 when Hawking, together with colleague Kip Thorne at Caltech, US, put this argument forward as a bet with John Preskill, also at Caltech. Preskill believed that, in accordance with quantum mechanics, information loss is impossible because it prevents the equations governing the process from being reversible. But in 2004 Hawking conceded the bet, saying he now believed that information is returned, although in a disguised state.
physicsworld.com...
PhoenixOD
reply to post by VoidHawk
Does that indicate that an object within the gravity would be pulled faster than the speed of light? If not why not?
And If so, then FTL is possible.
I think that what that means is that the energy needed to break free of a bent bit of space time that leads to the center of a black hole would be more energy than it would take to accelerate something to the speed of light.
edit on 27-9-2013 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
There is something in this passage that struck me. Curved space around an object. All bodies in space are mostly spherical in nature. Some more than others, yes... but triangular planets or stars have not been discovered! So my question is this: Is space curving around the gravitational field of an object (like the Sun) due to its spherical nature, or is the interaction of space with the gravitational field causing the spherical shape? (That was so hard to word, to get my question across. What I'm asking is... is space bending around a sphere, or is the sphere shaped by the bending?)
Mass is linked to space in a way that physicists today still do not completely understand. However, we know that the stronger the gravitational field of an object, the more the space around the object is curved.
Large bodies in space are nearly spherical because a sphere is the shape which can contain the most volume with the least surface area. Gravity tends to cause an object to become as small as it can given the constraints of structural integrity. Gravity makes an object (if massive enough) collapse as much as it can. The result has to be a sphere.
There is something in this passage that struck me.
Thanks for the kind, informative response. (Kinda scared when I saw I'd been Phaged, lol)
Phage
reply to post by new_here
Large bodies in space are nearly spherical because a sphere is the shape which can contain the most volume with the least surface area. Gravity tends to cause an object to become as small as it can given the constraints of structural integrity. Gravity makes an object (if massive enough) collapse as much as it can. The result has to be a sphere.
There is something in this passage that struck me.
Sort of like of the reason soap bubbles tend to be spherical.
Please give your take on what causes gravity. It's not fully understood, or at least subject to some debate... am I right? I'd be interested to know what you adhere to.
VoidHawk
A black hole is an object — typically a collapsed star — whose gravity is so strong that its escape velocity exceeds the speed of light. Since nothing is known to exceed the speed of light, nothing can escape from a black hole.
Does that indicate that an object within the gravity would be pulled faster than the speed of light? If not why not?
And If so, then FTL is possible.
totallackey
reply to post by PhoenixOD
Thank you for your response.
I understand the analogies you presented. Link 3 in the OP actually provides a picture and explanation of the 3D explanation...
Now, if I was to set a marble in motion along a path, would the marble not speed up as it goes along toward its eventual destination at the bottom of the pit? Or would this be an optical illusion?
ETA: I understand the light issue. Light is really not drawn in to a black hole. But the force of gravity present is written in terms of escape velocity, in this case 186,000 miles per second. The Earth is maintaining sufficient velocity around the Sun to avoid being "sucked in," is it not? If this is the case, then is the "speed of attraction," (aka, "sucked in") for a black hole 186,000.00001 mps?edit on 27-9-2013 by totallackey because: further content